.:pyramid:. Posted June 24, 2008 Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 in my opinion limiting DAD would make dad balanced in terms of how quickly it can be brought into play, resulting in dad decks having to run cards to control their graveyard which may make it less metta breaking to play. ..................discuss: go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted June 24, 2008 Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 The sky is blue. Thanks for stating the obvious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted June 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 ]The sky is blue. Thanks for stating the obvious. NP, just one question though, why are most players then saying this card should be banned. anyway this is less about the card than people may think (clue) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharaoh_Atem Posted June 24, 2008 Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 TC: Stop being wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted June 24, 2008 Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 How is DAD good for the game at 1 but bad for the game at 3? I've seen your banlist. You abuse the Limit function ridiculously, which indicates that you don't understand why Semi-Limiting is pointless (at least with our current card pool). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted June 24, 2008 Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 DAD + BANNED = GOOD DAD + Limited = Pointless. Ban the darn dragon. I sold mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted June 24, 2008 Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 wow times being normally wrong by 2 then times that by how wrong everyone else is in the world every day then times that by infinity squared and THATS how wrong you are Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted June 24, 2008 Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 How is DAD good for the game at 1 but bad for the game at 3? Q4E. BAN THE DRAGON Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted June 24, 2008 Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 wow times being normally wrong by 2 then times that by how wrong everyone else is in the world every day then times that by infinity squared and THATS how wrong you are Here we see tonis talking about something he doesn't actually know about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted June 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 How is DAD good for the game at 1 but bad for the game at 3? i didnt say it would be good for the game, i just don't think it would have a big impact at 1. people would need to put more set up into dad at one like heavy storm for example because your opponent could much easier play with your graveyard to hurt the chances of gaining synergy with dad. p.s crab plz explain how dad is bad for the game at one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted June 24, 2008 Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 wow times being normally wrong by 2 then times that by how wrong everyone else is in the world every day then times that by infinity squared and THATS how wrong you are Here we see tonis talking about something he doesn't actually know about. see anyone with half a brain coud see i was referring to pyramid but there umbra goes again trying to put people down because hes an idiot ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted June 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 wow times being normally wrong by 2 then times that by how wrong everyone else is in the world every day then times that by infinity squared and THATS how wrong you are Here we see tonis talking about something he doesn't actually know about. see anyone with half a brain coud see i was referring to pyramid but there umbra goes again trying to put people down because hes an idiot ^_^ well at least your not doing that...... , anyways seeing as you have half a brain or more plz enlighten me why dad is bad for the game at one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted June 24, 2008 Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 becuase no matter what way you look at it its rediculously easy summoning conditions mean its always a neg 3 on your opponent no card shouldd be unlimited hell limited even with a card soo powerful and i hope i didnt offent you pyramid just emphisising how i felt :) (plus i thot it was kinda funny ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted June 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 becuase no matter what way you look at it its rediculously easy summoning conditions mean its always a neg 3 on your opponent no card shouldd be unlimited hell limited even with a card soo powerful and i hope i didnt offent you pyramid just emphisising how i felt :) (plus i thot it was kinda funny ) dw tons we are all sorta friends on heres lol. tons ur describing a dad at three in a deck. try keeping your grave count to that and once it is gone you can't retrieve it efficiently ( monster reincarnation ). it may just work in a nomi deck. i can't see it working to well outside of it. to try and prove my point could you make a competitive deck with dad at one?( meaning dad is the heart of the deck plan ). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted June 24, 2008 Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 How is DAD good for the game at 1 but bad for the game at 3? i didnt say it would be good for the game' date='[/quote'] You said you wanted him at 1. After it ha sbeen established that 3 is unacceptable, choosing 1 over 0 indicates that he helps the game in some way through his existence. i just don't think it would have a big impact at 1. people would need to put more set up into dad at one like heavy storm for example because your opponent could much easier play with your graveyard to hurt the chances of gaining synergy with dad. You are using Konami logic. Stop. Remember that it only takes 1 DAD to win' date=' just as it only takes 1 Chaos Emperor Dragon to win. p.s crab plz explain how dad is bad for the game at one? Exactly the same way that it is bad for the game at 3. Except that having it at 1 also means that luck is more heavily emphasized in drawing cards, thus shifting victory even more from skill-dependent to luck-dependent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted June 24, 2008 Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 dad decks have plenty of draw power so chances are they will draw into dad plu sdad decks dont need dad to win so once dad hits the field unless you have a counter trap facedown THEY WILL MOST LIKLEY WIN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted June 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 How is DAD good for the game at 1 but bad for the game at 3? i didnt say it would be good for the game' date='[/quote'] You said you wanted him at 1. After it ha sbeen established that 3 is unacceptable, choosing 1 over 0 indicates that he helps the game in some way through his existence. i just don't think it would have a big impact at 1. people would need to put more set up into dad at one like heavy storm for example because your opponent could much easier play with your graveyard to hurt the chances of gaining synergy with dad. You are using Konami logic. Stop. Remember that it only takes 1 DAD to win' date=' just as it only takes 1 Chaos Emperor Dragon to win. p.s crab plz explain how dad is bad for the game at one? Exactly the same way that it is bad for the game at 3. Except that having it at 1 also means that luck is more heavily emphasized in drawing cards, thus shifting victory even more from skill-dependent to luck-dependent. lol i was about to write that being the only argument i was going to accept. but you would need to play a deck which could control the graveyard over a long period where dads grave control is short term, which i think is next to impossible with atm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted June 24, 2008 Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 wow times being normally wrong by 2 then times that by how wrong everyone else is in the world every day then times that by infinity squared and THATS how wrong you are Here we see tonis talking about something he doesn't actually know about. see anyone with half a brain coud see i was referring to pyramid but there umbra goes again trying to put people down because hes an idiot ^_^ You speak math language that don't make sense; therefore, I assumed you had no idea what you were talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted June 24, 2008 Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 well, with only 1 DAD the DAD decks will main strike ninja, skull lair or bazoo to control the number of dark monsters on the grave when they need to... oh wait... DAD deck has already main strike ninja!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted June 24, 2008 Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 Greetings, mere mortals. My name is Prometheus. I am King of the Shadows. I'm here to destroy your pathetic arguments about a topic that is itself pathetic and not worthy of discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted June 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 ok fair do's. i completly forgot about that card. so dad probably is just as dangerous at 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyfi Posted June 24, 2008 Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 You Might As Well Ban Dark Monster Cuz They Let You Play Dad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted June 25, 2008 Report Share Posted June 25, 2008 Greetings' date=' mere mortals. My name is Prometheus. I am King of the Shadows. I'm here to destroy your pathetic arguments about a topic that is itself pathetic and not worthy of discussion.[/quote']Hi, Prometheus! You rock for giving us FIER. :3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted June 25, 2008 Report Share Posted June 25, 2008 It should be limited to one. Dark Armed Dragon is broken by itself. Dark Armed Dragon's support makes it more broken and Top Tier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted June 25, 2008 Report Share Posted June 25, 2008 You Might As Well Ban Dark Monster Cuz They Let You Play Dad Dark Monsters In General Aren't The Problem As There Are Plenty Of Decent' date=' Not Broken Dark Monsters. Following This Terrible Logic We Should Ban Every Single Monster Instead Of Banning Monster Reborn. Also, capitalizing every word in your sentence makes you look like a tool. It should be limited to one. Dark Armed Dragon is broken by itself. Dark Armed Dragon's support makes it more broken and Top Tier. Explain how 3 Dark Armed Dragons are bad, but one is alright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.