hotfoilcard Posted June 25, 2008 Report Share Posted June 25, 2008 Except that the title was related to the topic in a roundabout way. Your idea of posting a "YVD help" thread and then linking to that thread doesn't even make sense in a roundabout way. Sangan is banworthy because it's generic searching. Having 1500 or less ATK really isn't that big of a drawback. Now' date=' if it searched for Fiend-Type monsters with 1500 or less ATK or something like that, it would be more balanced. Also, I believe someone once said that it being banned would encourage people to run more monsters with 1501 or more ATK, but I personally think that that reasoning is jank. In any case, if you want to debate Sangan, make a different thread.[/quote'] you guys should make a "making fun of other sites" sub forum...your obsessed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos Pudding Posted June 25, 2008 Report Share Posted June 25, 2008 Except that the title was related to the topic in a roundabout way. Your idea of posting a "YVD help" thread and then linking to that thread doesn't even make sense in a roundabout way. Sangan is banworthy because it's generic searching. Having 1500 or less ATK really isn't that big of a drawback. Now' date=' if it searched for Fiend-Type monsters with 1500 or less ATK or something like that, it would be more balanced. Also, I believe someone once said that it being banned would encourage people to run more monsters with 1501 or more ATK, but I personally think that that reasoning is jank. In any case, if you want to debate Sangan, make a different thread.[/quote'] you guys should make a "making fun of other sites" sub forum...your obsessed. You are missing the point. Treeborn Frog was the reason that Raiza was allowed to be summoned so many times. If Treeborn is banned, then Raiza can come back at 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotfoilcard Posted June 25, 2008 Report Share Posted June 25, 2008 Except that the title was related to the topic in a roundabout way. Your idea of posting a "YVD help" thread and then linking to that thread doesn't even make sense in a roundabout way. Sangan is banworthy because it's generic searching. Having 1500 or less ATK really isn't that big of a drawback. Now' date=' if it searched for Fiend-Type monsters with 1500 or less ATK or something like that, it would be more balanced. Also, I believe someone once said that it being banned would encourage people to run more monsters with 1501 or more ATK, but I personally think that that reasoning is jank. In any case, if you want to debate Sangan, make a different thread.[/quote'] you guys should make a "making fun of other sites" sub forum...your obsessed. You are missing the point. Treeborn Frog was the reason that Raiza was allowed to be summoned so many times. If Treeborn is banned, then Raiza can come back at 3. reading comprehesion 1/10 when did i mention either one of those... plus treeborn isnt the only fodder for raiza foolreapermallonmalitwin headgellenduobrainsoulspy um need i go on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos Pudding Posted June 25, 2008 Report Share Posted June 25, 2008 Except that the title was related to the topic in a roundabout way. Your idea of posting a "YVD help" thread and then linking to that thread doesn't even make sense in a roundabout way. Sangan is banworthy because it's generic searching. Having 1500 or less ATK really isn't that big of a drawback. Now' date=' if it searched for Fiend-Type monsters with 1500 or less ATK or something like that, it would be more balanced. Also, I believe someone once said that it being banned would encourage people to run more monsters with 1501 or more ATK, but I personally think that that reasoning is jank. In any case, if you want to debate Sangan, make a different thread.[/quote'] you guys should make a "making fun of other sites" sub forum...your obsessed. You are missing the point. Treeborn Frog was the reason that Raiza was allowed to be summoned so many times. If Treeborn is banned, then Raiza can come back at 3. reading comprehesion 1/10 when did i mention either one of those... plus treeborn isnt the only fodder for raiza foolreapermallonmalitwin headgellenduobrainsoulspy um need i go on? But, you see, even without Arms Hole, Premature Burial is banworthy. Generic mindless recursion is not good for the game as a whole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purple Dinosaur Posted June 25, 2008 Report Share Posted June 25, 2008 Or he lack reading comprehension skills' date=' which probably also means he fails at this game. Reading is a lost art nowadays...[/quote'] Don't you dare say I fail. At least I don't spend half a day reading a Card Effect to know what it means. I DO know how to read however Card Effects aren't something I would spend time on reading. Plus, it really sounds like you're sucking up to Crab Helmet. I'm not saying you are, it's just the tone you are using makes it sound like you're his servant or something. I'm not trying to insult or flame you though, please understand that. I just really don't want people to say I fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Prophet Posted June 27, 2008 Report Share Posted June 27, 2008 Question: Is TCG Player a forum full of noobs who think they're all some kind of banlist making genius? If so' date=' than obviously they need to learn what a Tribute Summon is. Also, The guy who posted it was a Moderator, Moderators should be better at deciding how a good banlist should go, More like Yourself Crab.[/quote'] These comments are not fair. You cannot judge an entire forum on ONE fictional ban list made by ONE member. Moderators are not chosen on their ability to make good fictional ban lists either. That should be obvious. But he is allowed to post his version of the ban list, and shouldn't have to be insulted by people like you. If you don't like the list, say so in a non-abusive way and move on. I think we can all agree that the current ban list is not exactly perfect. It's far from it. But at least he's making an attempt to balance it a bit. And as I clarified in another thread, Pharaoh Horus was voted best player in 2007 because of his standout performance in a dueling war with another yugioh forum (yugioh era). That is all. It has nothing to do with his fan list making skills. I'd also like to point out that none of your fan lists are perfect either..... especially your's CrabHelmet (no offense). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotfoilcard Posted June 27, 2008 Report Share Posted June 27, 2008 Except that the title was related to the topic in a roundabout way. Your idea of posting a "YVD help" thread and then linking to that thread doesn't even make sense in a roundabout way. Sangan is banworthy because it's generic searching. Having 1500 or less ATK really isn't that big of a drawback. Now' date=' if it searched for Fiend-Type monsters with 1500 or less ATK or something like that, it would be more balanced. Also, I believe someone once said that it being banned would encourage people to run more monsters with 1501 or more ATK, but I personally think that that reasoning is jank. In any case, if you want to debate Sangan, make a different thread.[/quote'] you guys should make a "making fun of other sites" sub forum...your obsessed. You are missing the point. Treeborn Frog was the reason that Raiza was allowed to be summoned so many times. If Treeborn is banned, then Raiza can come back at 3. reading comprehesion 1/10 when did i mention either one of those... plus treeborn isnt the only fodder for raiza foolreapermallonmalitwin headgellenduobrainsoulspy um need i go on? But, you see, even without Arms Hole, Premature Burial is banworthy. Generic mindless recursion is not good for the game as a whole. g3n3ric.... i was talking about tributes not recursion obv i swear that's the same post my yugioh magic 8 ball would have made Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted June 27, 2008 Report Share Posted June 27, 2008 Question: Is TCG Player a forum full of noobs who think they're all some kind of banlist making genius? If so' date=' than obviously they need to learn what a Tribute Summon is. Also, The guy who posted it was a Moderator, Moderators should be better at deciding how a good banlist should go, More like Yourself Crab.[/quote'] These comments are not fair. You cannot judge an entire forum on ONE fictional ban list made by ONE member.From what can tell, they are judging them based on the commentsModerators are not chosen on their ability to make good fictional ban lists either. That should be obvious. But he is allowed to post his version of the ban list, and shouldn't have to be insulted by people like you. If you don't like the list, say so in a non-abusive way and move on.This I agree with, but I couldn't see any posts that were abusiveI think we can all agree that the current ban list is not exactly perfect. It's far from it. But at least he's making an attempt to balance it a bit.Again true, but their are mistakes and when people try to say why with good reasoning they are ignoredAnd as I clarified in another thread, Pharaoh Horus was voted best player in 2007 because of his standout performance in a dueling war with another yugioh forum (yugioh era). That is all. It has nothing to do with his fan list making skills.OkI'd also like to point out that none of your fan lists are perfect either..... especially your's CrabHelmet (no offense).No list can ever be "perfect", but only work to perfection.I only read the first 4 pages but I think that is good enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.