bonsoboy Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 chick deck: monsters:wingweaver x2gyakutenno megamiwitch of the black forestmagician's valkyriamystacal elfavalanching aussaprotector of the thronespirit of the harpnanobreakerthe ulfriendly amazon x2shadow tamerhita the fire chamereria the water charmerwynn the wind charmermagician of faithtraps:ultimate offeringlidht of interventionwaboku x2sakuretsu armorshodow spellgift of the mystical elfjar of greedspellbinding circlereinforcements x2shiftmask of weaknessspells:swords of revealing light x2yamiheart of clear waterdian keto the cure master x2different demension capsulepremature burialmonster rebornde-spellremove trap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 Ive seen way better than this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bonsoboy Posted June 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 i have better decks, just this is my main, and i usually win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 What types of decks do you face? I just think that a deck like this could be better though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 "Billy" decks, or decks themed on things that shouldnt be considered themes, usually are very, very bad, and this is...try something else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 Yeah what was I thinking, this deck looks slow and bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 Also, illegal deck is illegal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 wheres the deck all i see is an unreadable list of cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 Swords of Revealing Light is limited to 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zexaeon Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 Decks based upon this kind of theme are typically bad and cannot win. However, I at least managed to put together a somewhat decent frame for a "Chick Deck" as you put it. The reason mine is at least passable is because I include cards that can at least work toward a win condition, as well as splashables. Please refer to it if you want a better example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 Swords of Revealing Light is limited to 1.Also, WotBF is banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 Swords of Revealing Light is limited to 1.Also' date=' WotBF is banned.[/quote']As is Magician of Faith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bonsoboy Posted June 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 yeah, but the thing about that is i didn't build this deck for tournements. i built it for duels with friends Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doroshow Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 This is my crystal beast deck: Monsters:Crystal Beast Sapphire Pegasusx3Crystal Beast Ruby Carbunclex3Crystal Beast Emerald Tortoisex2Crystal Beast Topaz Tigerx3Crystal Beast Amethyst Catx3Crystal Beast Amber Mammothx3Crystal Beast Colbalt Eaglex2Rainbow Dragonx1Hamon, Lord of Striking Thunderx1 Spells Ancient City-Rainbow Ruinsx3Crystal Abundancex2Crystal Blessingx2Crystal Beaconx2Crystal Promisex3Double Summonx1Lightning Vortexx1Smashing Groundx1 Traps Torrental Tribute Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 This is my crystal beast deck: Monsters:Crystal Beast Sapphire Pegasusx3Crystal Beast Ruby Carbunclex3Crystal Beast Emerald Tortoisex2Crystal Beast Topaz Tigerx3Crystal Beast Amethyst Catx3Crystal Beast Amber Mammothx3Crystal Beast Colbalt Eaglex2Rainbow Dragonx1Hamon' date=' Lord of Striking Thunderx1 Spells Ancient City-Rainbow Ruinsx3Crystal Abundancex2Crystal Blessingx2Crystal Beaconx2Crystal Promisex3Double Summonx1Lightning Vortexx1Smashing Groundx1 Traps Torrental Tribute[/quote'] Make your own thread next time, you're new so you probably wouldn't know...why don't people have common sense anymore? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zexaeon Posted June 21, 2008 Report Share Posted June 21, 2008 yeah' date=' but the thing about that is i didn't build this deck for tournements. i built it for duels with friends[/quote'] Then you probably should have posted it in traditional. And Swords is still limited even in that format. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doroshow Posted June 22, 2008 Report Share Posted June 22, 2008 Oh, sorry... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted June 22, 2008 Report Share Posted June 22, 2008 this deck is actually TERRIBLE AND SO IS THE CRYSTAL BEAST DECK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doroshow Posted June 22, 2008 Report Share Posted June 22, 2008 Butthead,Tonisanoob!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doroshow Posted June 22, 2008 Report Share Posted June 22, 2008 SORRY,Tonisanoob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crystal Frost Dragon Posted June 22, 2008 Report Share Posted June 22, 2008 This deck is an insult to all Female based decks. Also doroshow. Dont double post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.