Jump to content

TEH MUDKIPZ BANLIST


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

well actually no

 

 

 

Well actually yes.

 

 

 

right but right BUT actually no

 

all the card i banned have either very crippling to this (as in my banlist) format' date=' or skilless, unfair field resetting qualities

[/quote']

 

Yeah, like Destiny Hero - Malicious. It's extremely crippling to this format, and its ability to reset the entire field is clearly overpowered.

 

 

so skilless ss isnt bad in this format? either

 

and limiting the rfp card is a good thing it makes the deck less crippling to this format' date=' much less crippling

 

think macro monarch with all the rfp cards, it would be the equivellent of chaos deck

[/quote']

 

Yeah, totally. And we should totally ban every single RFP card ever. Totally. Because having any RFP cards is totally the same as having them all. Totally.

 

well yeha i think we shoudl plus i not banning then all plus ther eis liek 5 or somthing anywa

dd deserves banning

escape deserves banning

rfdd should have been banned long ago

 

and i changed the list so macro is unlimited okay lets end this part of the disscussion

 

but as the card are limited you need to use your skill at the game to either get the cards fast or kepp them on the field and even at the you only really have scout or survivor

 

Use your skill to get them out fast? And how do you propose we do that when one is unsearchable and the other is searchable only by Cat of Ill Omen? By topdecking and hoping we draw them? What skill.

 

magical merchant methinks ddc

 

 

also you said you want to get rid of luck so all cards liek cup of ace shoudl go' date=' and you cant really ban an ENTIRE archetype, wich is why arcana force cards can stay (eept the worl of very obvious reasons)

[/quote']

 

As usual, you fools confuse "Luck Is Not A Cost" with "All Elements Involving Chance Must Immediately Be Banned".

 

no luck shouldnt be allowed, plus al the luck as cost cardsare banned

 

there isnt anything involving chance in the game as it is

 

hmm okay so lets think why they should saty

 

You're doing it wrong. The default position of all cards is 3. What you need to do is justify why they should not stay.

 

skilless desrtoy 2

skillless negate all' date=' ebvn in this format hekalinos is broken and you kno this crab

 

also limiting the 6s stuff is good enough and fair

 

You do not understand the criteria for Limiting cards.

 

You probably don't even know why Semi-Limiting is nonsensical, but you've noticed that other people say that Semi-Limiting is bad, so you blindly follow.

 

no i do kno why actually, i neve though that seming things has a point, evn when i first started

 

and limiting the 6s stuff makes the deck balanced as oposed to nonsensical swarming

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well actually no

 

 

 

Well actually yes.

 

 

right but right BUT actually no

 

Let's start a pantomime. OH NO IT ISN'T' date=' OH YES IT IS.

 

all the card i banned have either very crippling to this (as in my banlist) format' date=' or skilless, unfair field resetting qualities

[/quote']

 

Yeah, like Destiny Hero - Malicious. It's extremely crippling to this format, and its ability to reset the entire field is clearly overpowered.

 

so skilless ss isnt bad in this format? either

 

Is Six Samurai the most skilled deck in existence? Of course not. Is there any justification for randomly Limiting its monsters? Not that I can see.

 

Also, I love how you dodge the issue of your idiotic choices for what to ban. Well done.

 

and limiting the rfp card is a good thing it makes the deck less crippling to this format' date=' much less crippling

 

think macro monarch with all the rfp cards, it would be the equivellent of chaos deck

[/quote']

 

Yeah, totally. And we should totally ban every single RFP card ever. Totally. Because having any RFP cards is totally the same as having them all. Totally.

 

well yeha i think we shoudl plus i not banning then all plus ther eis liek 5 or somthing anywa

dd deserves banning

escape deserves banning

rfdd should have been banned long ago

 

and i changed the list so macro is unlimited okay lets end this part of the disscussion

 

No, let's not, because your entire justification for DDR and Escape is "deserves banning".

 

but as the card are limited you need to use your skill at the game to either get the cards fast or kepp them on the field and even at the you only really have scout or survivor

 

Use your skill to get them out fast? And how do you propose we do that when one is unsearchable and the other is searchable only by Cat of Ill Omen? By topdecking and hoping we draw them? What skill.

 

magical merchant methinks ddc

 

Ooh' date=' Magical Merchant. More flip effects, more topdecking.

 

also you said you want to get rid of luck so all cards liek cup of ace shoudl go' date=' and you cant really ban an ENTIRE archetype, wich is why arcana force cards can stay (eept the worl of very obvious reasons)

[/quote']

 

As usual, you fools confuse "Luck Is Not A Cost" with "All Elements Involving Chance Must Immediately Be Banned".

 

no luck shouldnt be allowed, plus al the luck as cost cardsare banned

 

there isnt anything involving chance in the game as it is

 

Trying to remove all elements of luck from a card game is idiotic. The goal is to minimize the ability of luck to trump skilled play, not to purge luck entirely from the game.

 

hmm okay so lets think why they should saty

 

You're doing it wrong. The default position of all cards is 3. What you need to do is justify why they should not stay.

 

skilless desrtoy 2

skillless negate all' date=' ebvn in this format hekalinos is broken and you kno this crab

[/quote']

 

It's easy to throw the word "skillless" in front of a restatement of a card's effect and pretend that it constitutes a justification, doesn't it, toni?

 

Try again.

 

also limiting the 6s stuff is good enough and fair

 

You do not understand the criteria for Limiting cards.

 

You probably don't even know why Semi-Limiting is nonsensical' date=' but you've noticed that other people say that Semi-Limiting is bad, so you blindly follow.

[/quote']

 

no i do kno why actually, i neve though that seming things has a point, evn when i first started

 

and limiting the 6s stuff makes the deck balanced as oposed to nonsensical swarming

 

As I thought, you don't understand when Limiting is necessary. Limiting is delicate, far more delicate than outright banning, and your abuse of Limiting is disgraceful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol @ not alphabetized.

Lol @ terrible spelling and grammar

Lol @ not spelling out the whole name

Lol @ list

Lol @ TC

Lol @ limiting Macro Cosmos and Dimensional Fissure

 

Q4E and Fixed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...