Kale Posted June 15, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 Yayz im still in the lead!!! ^^ims a happy camper~ i bet. ^_^ and @ element8923: okay, i await your post.. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsplayer627 Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 i tried to redue them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsplayer627 Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 i tried to redue them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsplayer627 Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 i tried to redue them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N00B Hunter Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 rofl... I'm sorry, I have to make this card.You want a fast duel, here's the card you want! It'll end the duel in one move! (Let's see if it beats ivandanny...) Picture Credit: "QuickStopMe" of Deviantart created this picture... I know the spotlight's a bit too bright but it messes up other features when it's toned down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N00B Hunter Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 rofl... I'm sorry, I have to make this card.You want a fast duel, here's the card you want! It'll end the duel in one move! (Let's see if it beats ivandanny...) Picture Credit: "QuickStopMe" of Deviantart created this picture... I know the spotlight's a bit too bright but it messes up other features when it's toned down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kale Posted June 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 sportsplayer627: card 1:Name: -- 4% out of 5% (could be a little better)Pic: -- 5% out of 5% (pretty good)OCG: -- 9% out of 10% (not perfect, but close)Balance: -- 15% out of 20% (overpowered, like a stronger gearfreed, and 2000 ATK?)Complexity of the card effect: -- 15% out of 20% (more complicated than before)Overall Fastness: -- 20% out of 40% (not what the contest was looking for...) total: -- 68% out of 100% card 2:Name: -- 4% out of 5% (kind of cool..)Pic: -- 5% out of 5% (nice)OCG: -- 8% out of 10% (not perfect.)Balance: -- 15% out of 20% (like a returning fairy meteor crush...and, it inflicts damage instantly now...)Complexity of the card effect: -- 20% out of 20% (complex. 'nuff said.)Overall Fastness: -- 25% out of 40% (not really "fast") total: -- 77% out of 100% card 3:Name: -- 5 out of 5% (works.)Pic: -- 5 out of 5% (fits for the name)OCG: -- 9 out of 10% (something seems off to me...)Balance: -- 17% out of 20% (you could make a continuous mill deck with this card and a spirit deck.... ^_^)Complexity of the card effect: -- 15% out of 20% (not really complex...)Overall Fastness: -- 20% out of 40% (you have to wait for the cards to return, thats kinda slow...) total: -- 71% out of 100% card 4:Name: -- 4 out of 5% (seems overused somehow..)Pic: -- 4 out of 5% (i can see a bit of text in the bottom right corner...)OCG: -- 10% out of 10% (seems good...)Balance: -- 20 out of 20% (pretty balanced)Complexity of the card effect: -- 17 out of 20% (kinda complicated.)Overall Fastness: -- 30% out of 40% (sort of fast, depending on the circumstances..) total: -- 85% out of 100% card 5:Name: -- 5 out of 5% (cool name!)Pic: -- 4 out of 5% (kinda weird...)OCG: -- 10 out of 10% (seems okay to me)Balance: -- 18 out of 20% (pretty balanced.)Complexity of the card effect: -- 18 out of 20% (pretty complex)Overall Fastness: -- 25 out of 40% (depends on the situation for speed...) total: -- 80 out of 100% card 6:Name: -- 5 out of 5% (good)Pic: -- 3 out of 5% (doesnt exactly fit...)OCG: -- 10 out of 10% (no problem)Balance: -- 10 out of 20% (you could add premature and SS a monster.... for free! like arms hole without the cost!)Complexity of the card effect: -- 10 out of 20% (short and too the point)Overall Fastness: -- 35 out of 40% (instant effect! but not what the contest was looking for...) total: -- 73 out of 100% average: 75.666666 rounded to 76%. that is 1% less than before, i will not count this new score against your original. ^_^_____ N00B Hunter: Name: -- 5 out of 5% (awesome name!)Pic: -- 4 out of 5% (fits with name, but not too great of a pic)OCG: -- 8 out of 10% (a bit weird throughout the middle...)Balance: -- 20 out of 20% (pretty balanced...)Complexity of the card effect: -- 20 out of 20% (dont even get me started on how comlpex this is...)Overall Fastness: -- 30 out of 40% (instant, and will declare a winner, but it was a fast card i was looking for, not a way to quicken the duel. ^_^) total: -- 87 out of 100%_____ i was looking for a card that went around the lines of: "when this card is Normal Summoned, Flip Summoned, or Special Summoned, remove it from play. When this card is removed from play by its own effect, return it to your deck Face-Up. When you draw this Face-Up card, You can Special Summon it." or something that was fast for the card itself. thats what i wanted. ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kale Posted June 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 sportsplayer627: card 1:Name: -- 4% out of 5% (could be a little better)Pic: -- 5% out of 5% (pretty good)OCG: -- 9% out of 10% (not perfect, but close)Balance: -- 15% out of 20% (overpowered, like a stronger gearfreed, and 2000 ATK?)Complexity of the card effect: -- 15% out of 20% (more complicated than before)Overall Fastness: -- 20% out of 40% (not what the contest was looking for...) total: -- 68% out of 100% card 2:Name: -- 4% out of 5% (kind of cool..)Pic: -- 5% out of 5% (nice)OCG: -- 8% out of 10% (not perfect.)Balance: -- 15% out of 20% (like a returning fairy meteor crush...and, it inflicts damage instantly now...)Complexity of the card effect: -- 20% out of 20% (complex. 'nuff said.)Overall Fastness: -- 25% out of 40% (not really "fast") total: -- 77% out of 100% card 3:Name: -- 5 out of 5% (works.)Pic: -- 5 out of 5% (fits for the name)OCG: -- 9 out of 10% (something seems off to me...)Balance: -- 17% out of 20% (you could make a continuous mill deck with this card and a spirit deck.... ^_^)Complexity of the card effect: -- 15% out of 20% (not really complex...)Overall Fastness: -- 20% out of 40% (you have to wait for the cards to return, thats kinda slow...) total: -- 71% out of 100% card 4:Name: -- 4 out of 5% (seems overused somehow..)Pic: -- 4 out of 5% (i can see a bit of text in the bottom right corner...)OCG: -- 10% out of 10% (seems good...)Balance: -- 20 out of 20% (pretty balanced)Complexity of the card effect: -- 17 out of 20% (kinda complicated.)Overall Fastness: -- 30% out of 40% (sort of fast, depending on the circumstances..) total: -- 85% out of 100% card 5:Name: -- 5 out of 5% (cool name!)Pic: -- 4 out of 5% (kinda weird...)OCG: -- 10 out of 10% (seems okay to me)Balance: -- 18 out of 20% (pretty balanced.)Complexity of the card effect: -- 18 out of 20% (pretty complex)Overall Fastness: -- 25 out of 40% (depends on the situation for speed...) total: -- 80 out of 100% card 6:Name: -- 5 out of 5% (good)Pic: -- 3 out of 5% (doesnt exactly fit...)OCG: -- 10 out of 10% (no problem)Balance: -- 10 out of 20% (you could add premature and SS a monster.... for free! like arms hole without the cost!)Complexity of the card effect: -- 10 out of 20% (short and too the point)Overall Fastness: -- 35 out of 40% (instant effect! but not what the contest was looking for...) total: -- 73 out of 100% average: 75.666666 rounded to 76%. that is 1% less than before, i will not count this new score against your original. ^_^_____ N00B Hunter: Name: -- 5 out of 5% (awesome name!)Pic: -- 4 out of 5% (fits with name, but not too great of a pic)OCG: -- 8 out of 10% (a bit weird throughout the middle...)Balance: -- 20 out of 20% (pretty balanced...)Complexity of the card effect: -- 20 out of 20% (dont even get me started on how comlpex this is...)Overall Fastness: -- 30 out of 40% (instant, and will declare a winner, but it was a fast card i was looking for, not a way to quicken the duel. ^_^) total: -- 87 out of 100%_____ i was looking for a card that went around the lines of: "when this card is Normal Summoned, Flip Summoned, or Special Summoned, remove it from play. When this card is removed from play by its own effect, return it to your deck Face-Up. When you draw this Face-Up card, You can Special Summon it." or something that was fast for the card itself. thats what i wanted. ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle2 Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 This is that cinderella card from the guy who had fairy tale cards i forgot his name Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle2 Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 This is that cinderella card from the guy who had fairy tale cards i forgot his name Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsplayer627 Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 actually kale you under calculated noob hunterits 87% he didnt get 77 i calculated on excel and how could i get a lower score i did exactly what you said to do i changed just about everything and i get a lower score, and i thought my highest score counted toward my % 85 that doesnt seem really fair in my case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsplayer627 Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 actually kale you under calculated noob hunterits 87% he didnt get 77 i calculated on excel and how could i get a lower score i did exactly what you said to do i changed just about everything and i get a lower score, and i thought my highest score counted toward my % 85 that doesnt seem really fair in my case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kale Posted June 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 actually kale you under calculated noob hunterits 87% he didnt get 77 i calculated on excel *looks over N00b Hunter's numbers...* ah' date=' so it is. i did miss count... hank you for noticing someone else's post, that is very admirable, and for that i am giving you a +rep. and how could i get a lower score i did exactly what you said to do i changed just about everything and i get a lower score, and i thought my highest score counted toward my % 85 that doesnt seem really fair in my case i really am sorry, but you made the proper changes on most of the card, yes. but you made a couple a bit overpowered, like Legendary Soldier and Weapons Manufacture. Have you ever heard of the card called 'Arms Hole'? it does the same thing as Weapon's Manufacture, but it has a cost. yours has no cost, so it makes it a tad overpowered. And with Legendary Soldier, you make it that when he has an equip Spell is equipped to him, the opponenet loses 500. even though the spell is destroyed makes it balanced, the point that he has ATK of 2000 makes him overpowered.... you did just as good as last time, and you fixed the text in the pictures and other stuff like that... but you did make some of the cards' effects a tad different, and as a result lowered your overall score by 1%. im very sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsplayer627 Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 oh well thanks for the rep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kale Posted June 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 oh well thanks for the rep youre very welcome. i thought that it was a very nice thing that you did to help N00b Hunter. that put him in his earned 3rd place. very admirable. ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsplayer627 Posted June 18, 2008 Report Share Posted June 18, 2008 no problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted June 18, 2008 Report Share Posted June 18, 2008 You know how I said "I'd leave it at that for now?" Well guess what...I have edited my entry post with one new card. check post number 7 for the new entry card. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kale Posted June 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 18, 2008 alright. ^_^ I will grade your new card and average your score, as well as grade Pickel2's card tomorrow. ^_^ The card contest ends TONIGHT!! Get your entries in! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
super-vegeta Posted June 18, 2008 Report Share Posted June 18, 2008 These are my cards: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kale Posted June 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 18, 2008 Pickle2: Name: 2 out of 5% (extremely not original....)Pic: 3 out of 5% (kinda squashed...)OCG: 2 out of 10%(you have the idea, but spelling and OCG as well as grammAr was off.)Balance: 15 out of 20% (balanced from what i can tell...)Complexity of the card effect: 15 out of 20% (very simple effect...)Overall Fastness: 15 out of 40% (not fast at all.... in fact, kinda slow...) total: 52 out of 100% (sorry...)_____ San-Meti 13: Already Graded: card 1:Name: 4 out of 5 (now that there is a black rose dragon card its not entirely original, but its still cool.)Pic: -- 5% out of 5% (nice! i messed up here before, sorry.)OCG: -- 10% out of 10% (i didnt see any problems.)Balance: -- 18% out of 20% (something seemed a bit off, but i cant put my finger on it.... but still very balanced.)Complexity of the card effect: -- 20% out of 20% (very complex. nuf said. Laughing )Overall Fastness: -- 20% out of 40% (didnt really fit the theme i was looking for for this contest....) total: -- 77% out of 100% card 2:Name: -- 5% out of 5% (awesome!)Pic: -- 4% out of 5% (isnt that sepheroth?)OCG: -- 10% out of 10% (no problems i see...)Balance: -- 20% out of 20% (seems balanced)Complexity of the card effect: -- 20% out of 20% (seems complex to me)Overall Fastness: -- 25% out of 40% (still isnt the quick type of card i requested) total: 89% out of 100% card 3:Name: -- 4% out of 5% (not the best, but still great)Pic: -- 5% out of 5% (pretty good)OCG: -- 9% out of 10% (something seems off, but pretty much there.)Balance: -- 19% out of 20% (not perfect, but not off the deep end.)Complexity of the card effect: -- 20% out of 20% (seems complicated)Overall Fastness: -- 27% out of 40% (again, not the quick type of card i wanted.) total: 84% out of 100% average: 81.66666 rounded to 82. ^_^[/graded before] New: card 4:Name: -- 4% out of 5% (only becuase its weird... O.o "i summon San-Icy Viero!")Pic: -- 5% out of 5% (nice!)OCG: -- 10% out of 10% (seems perfect to me. ^_^)Balance: -- 19% out of 20% (not perfect to me, but close to perfect)Complexity of the card effect: -- 20% out of 20% (complicated. 'nuff said.)Overall Fastness: -- 32% out of 40% (not the quickness i was looking for, but could be quick, if played right. ^_^) total: 90% out of 100% new average: 85 exactly ^_^ up by 3%. _____ super-vegeta : card 1:Name: 5 out of 5% (good name!)Pic: 5 out of 5% (neat pic!)OCG: 5 out of 10% (kinda off....)Balance: 15 out of 20% (special summon, not destroyed if played right, and power boost!!)Complexity of the card effect: 20 out of 20% (complex card though. ^_^)Overall Fastness: 20 out of 40% (not exactly what the contest was after...) total: -- 70% out of 100% card 2:Name: 5 out of 5% (good name!)Pic: 5 out of 5% (neat pic!)OCG: 10 out of 10% (Spot on to me...)Balance: 15 out of 20% (2200 ATK level 4, and inflict damage per destroyed monster!!)Complexity of the card effect: 15 out of 20% (not very complex...)Overall Fastness: 25 out of 40% (faster than previous card.) total: -- 75% out of 100% card 3:Name: 5 out of 5% (good name!)Pic: 5 out of 5% (neat pic!)OCG: 10 out of 10% (Spot on..)Balance: 10 out of 20% (direct damage, peircing, and SS 1 if its destroyed!!)Complexity of the card effect: 20 out of 20% (complex card though. ^_^)Overall Fastness: 28 out of 40% (not that fast... but close..) total: -- 78% out of 100% average: 74.33333 rounded to 74% CONTEST OVER!! awards are being sent to the winners. ^_^ EDIT: i will give out the second rep to tea leaf and the rep to N00b Hunter tomorrow. I seem to have maxed out on Rep giving... can we only give 4 at a time now? O.o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.