carlos animax Posted January 22 Report Share Posted January 22 (edited) This cards I think can be more interesting duel, what do you think? :D Would this card be Unlimited, Semi-Limited, Limited or Banned?Time Travel Description/Effect: During the second Standby Phase after activation of this card; pay 1000 LP, and if you do, flip a coin and apply the appropriate effect. ●Heads: Both players Special Summon 2 Monsters of Level 4 or lower from their deck. ●Tails: Both players send 2 Monsters from their Field (if possible) to the top of their Decks, then, neither player can shuffle their Deck. You can only activate a “Time Travel” once per turn. Time Travel 2 Description/Effect During the second Standby Phase after the activation of this card; pay 1000 LP, and if you do, flip a coin and apply the appropriate effect. ●Heads: both players draw two cards. ●Tails: both players take the last two cards sent to the GY and put them on top of their Deck in any order. You can only activate a “Time Travel 2” once per turn. Edited January 23 by carlos animax Size text on the begin, and error in grammar. :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazerSwordKirbo Posted January 22 Report Share Posted January 22 Not being able to shuffle the deck is an interesting idea, and i'd like to see how a judge would rule the use of a search effect with the shuffle lock in effect. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlos animax Posted January 22 Author Report Share Posted January 22 53 minutes ago, LazerSwordKirbo said: Not being able to shuffle the deck is an interesting idea, and i'd like to see how a judge would rule the use of a search effect with the shuffle lock in effect. Yes, been very interesting that, really thank you so much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
not naze Posted January 22 Report Share Posted January 22 Fun cards, although I dont think they would be played at all, only because of the first sentence. An effect that goes in action 2 whole turns after it was activated is waaaay too slow for modern yugioh. Btw, as a non-english too I know writting ygh cards is really hard. I advise you to use tools like wordreference.com (to translate specific words) and scribens.com (for spelling, grammar and conjugation errors). I say that because "cara y cruz" in english is said "heads and tails", not face and cross lol. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlos animax Posted January 22 Author Report Share Posted January 22 2 hours ago, not naze said: Fun cards, although I dont think they would be played at all, only because of the first sentence. An effect that goes in action 2 whole turns after it was activated is waaaay too slow for modern yugioh. Btw, as a non-english too I know writting ygh cards is really hard. I advise you to use tools like wordreference.com (to translate specific words) and scribens.com (for spelling, grammar and conjugation errors). I say that because "cara y cruz" in english is said "heads and tails", not face and cross lol. Yup, it's a slow card, if can be activate effect in same turn can be a broken or not? Yes, it's true, don't remember that, was be "Head" and "tails" I going to correction on the night, thank you so much Bro. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
not naze Posted January 23 Report Share Posted January 23 Yeah definitely broken. Like with the potential to get banned altogether. Although I'm not sure, because both Face effects are 100% banworthy but the tails effects aren't as good. So it's kinda balanced by the 50/50 chance of having the broken effect. Imo they would limit them to 1 card per deck to test it and see if they ban them completely or not. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlos animax Posted January 23 Author Report Share Posted January 23 39 minutes ago, not naze said: Yeah definitely broken. Like with the potential to get banned altogether. Although I'm not sure, because both Face effects are 100% banworthy but the tails effects aren't as good. So it's kinda balanced by the 50/50 chance of having the broken effect. Imo they would limit them to 1 card per deck to test it and see if they ban them completely or not. Oh, oks, yes, can be a really broken, so can be a little more broken but not broken can be rather than 2nd Standby Phase, can be 1st Standby Phase, what do you think? :D By the way, already Correction this cards. :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
not naze Posted January 23 Report Share Posted January 23 Quote can be rather than 2nd Standby Phase, can be 1st Standby Phase, what do you think? :D It would be better, but still not really good. But it could be used and playable in some rogue control deck. It could be fun in a Runnick deck for example ! I think it's a good middle ground. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlos animax Posted January 23 Author Report Share Posted January 23 3 hours ago, not naze said: It would be better, but still not really good. But it could be used and playable in some rogue control deck. It could be fun in a Runnick deck for example ! I think it's a good middle ground. Ok, perfect, in a deck Runnick can be a very good, maybe darklord or darklord-despia as well. :D 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.