.:pyramid:. Posted June 5, 2008 Report Share Posted June 5, 2008 think about yu-gi-oh friendship n unity as it can make your opponent lose lp because of how rapidly you will be losing lp. but i dont know how to fit that in so probably not the best idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted June 6, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 6, 2008 Hmm, as I said, I'm not sure whether or not including an cards that manipulate life points is a good idea here. I just don't have the room. Still, it's a possibility. Also, The people from Xerocreative are suggesting that I dump Trap Dustshoot for either a 2nd Shield Crush or an Ehren/Drillroid. What do you guys think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted June 6, 2008 Report Share Posted June 6, 2008 people are xerocreative are morons, crush is no good, only thing that gets set is ryko or sangan or SR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted June 6, 2008 Report Share Posted June 6, 2008 is this an irl deck also maybe, side in yamata dragon? i would also add in creture swaps ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted June 6, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 6, 2008 people are xerocreative are morons' date=' crush is no good, only thing that gets set is ryko or sangan or SR[/quote'] While some of them most definitely are, the same could be said for YCM. There is certainly a population of members at Zerocreative that know what they're doing, just as there is an intelligent population of members here at YCM. I already discussed the usefulness of Shield Crush in this deck in my opening post. The question is, do you think that this deck's vulnerability to cards like Ryko or Marshmallon is large enough to justify the use of an additional defensive removal card? Also, if so, do you think that Shield Crush's speed offsets it's inability to be reused. Or does Ehren's monster status (In a deck with an underwhelming number of no-tribute monsters, thus creating instability.) and reusability justify her inability to remove a a threat in the same turn as I drop down HKT. Or does it make the most sense to keep Trap Dustshoot in, allowing me to shufle the threat back into the deck prior to it's even hitting the field?(Though it is only at it's maximum potential in the opening hand.) @ Tonis: Why Swaps? I only have a few monsters I'd want to swap. (Malicious, Disk Commander, Fear Monger.) But Yamata is an excellent Suggestion. It can help to speed through the deck until I reach Hino-Kagu-Tsuchi. If only it was 8 stars. Do you think it justifies a spot in the main deck? Or should I just side a pair? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted June 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 7, 2008 -BUMP- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted June 8, 2008 Report Share Posted June 8, 2008 i say side in, if you need it or not as its not lv 8 but at least i made a good suggestion ^_^ also swaps have great, synergy with spirit you take their monster swap it then you get your monster back thus if you need it some tribute fodder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted June 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2008 Wait, what? How do you get your monster back? Creature Swap is permanent, and I don't particularly want to give my opponent one of the monsters that I am specifically teching against. Spirit Reaper's invincibility is extremely irritating for this deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted June 8, 2008 Report Share Posted June 8, 2008 nonononon right you summon a spirit monster, attack say but they ahve liek 2 monsters, then creature swap their monster for your spirit then at the end of your turn the spirit monstergoes back to YOUR hand, thus why i think swap is a good idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted June 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2008 Oh, I see. Hmm, that could be interesting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tickle Me Emo Posted June 8, 2008 Report Share Posted June 8, 2008 I didnt take the time to read all teh suggestions so someone may have said this but spell economics or 2? You will be draining life very fast and judging from you low level monsters, a strong fairy meteor crush monster like Goryu can cause trouble if you cant pull the mossoleum in time. If that happens you may need to use spell ec or you wont have the lifepoints to pay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RacecaR Posted June 8, 2008 Report Share Posted June 8, 2008 8.2/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted June 10, 2008 Report Share Posted June 10, 2008 Alright, it looks nice.I wonder how it plays. Hm, I think there are better alternatives against things like Marshmallon. Ehren or Creature Swap, for example. Those things could also be moved to the side deck, because not many decks run Marshmallon anymore. Nice deck, though. FORCED REQUISITION + SNIPE HUNTER...? It would fit his strategy, but it does not work.Snipe's effect is a cost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted June 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2008 I dumped Trap Dustshoot for Exiled Force. Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted June 13, 2008 Report Share Posted June 13, 2008 hmmm im not sure on that, force wastes ur normal summon id prefer to have dustshoot but dustshoot is not good past the first hand, maybe crush would be a good idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted June 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2008 Crush meaning CCV, Mind Crush, or Shield Crush? CCV's already in here. I prefer Dustshot over Mind Crush. Shield Crush? Already got 1 in, but I'm not sure about a second. Still, I know what you mean about Exiled wasting the summon. That's a pretty big deal here. I mainly did it because he's a searchable method to blow away a Marshmallon or Heraklinos (If my opponent is able to drop it before I can do anything about it.). You don't think he's worth it? EDIT: Also, pyramid PM'ed me suggesting that I mix this with Gadgets so I can have a consistent flow of monsters should Mausoleum fail me. I have no idea how to make room for such a suggestion, and don't even think that it would mesh particularly well with this deck, but I thought the suggestion had some merit. Does anyone think such a build would be worth looking into? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted June 14, 2008 Report Share Posted June 14, 2008 i meant shield crush , no with the gadgets, it would involve removing 6 cards with would completely disrupt the synergy of this deck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.