Yᵤₘₐ ₖₐᵢbₐ Posted August 16, 2023 Report Share Posted August 16, 2023 Red-Eyes Dimensional Dragon [DARK] [Dragon/Link/Effect] ATK/2800 Link Rating 3 [↙↖↗] 2+ Dragon-type monsters with different Level, including 1 "Red-Eyes" monster (except "Red-Eyes B. Chick") Monsters cannot be Summoned in a zone(s) this card point to. When this card destroy(s) a monster, you can add 1 Link Arrow point wherever you choose. This card gains 500 ATK for each Monster zone that point to. Cannot be targeted by your opponent card effect, also, once per turn this card cannot be destroyed by card effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darj Posted August 16, 2023 Report Share Posted August 16, 2023 Not quite sure about why a player would wanrt to block its own Zones. What am I missing? Other than that... I'm no Red-Eyes expert but I would think it can be taxing for the archetype to spend 3 different Red-Eyes monsters for something such as this, a beater that, while it comes with protection effects, does not reach the 3000-ATK threshold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yᵤₘₐ ₖₐᵢbₐ Posted August 16, 2023 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2023 1 hour ago, Darj said: Not quite sure about why a player would wanrt to block its own Zones. What am I missing? Other than that... I'm no Red-Eyes expert but I would think it can be taxing for the archetype to spend 3 different Red-Eyes monsters for something such as this, a beater that, while it comes with protection effects, does not reach the 3000-ATK threshold. "Monster cannot be summoned in this point arrow". If you realize, this card arrow pointer to your opponent field (if place in extra monster zone). So, it will limit the opponent monster zone, look like "Ground Collapse" or "Ojama King" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darj Posted August 16, 2023 Report Share Posted August 16, 2023 2 hours ago, Yuma Kaiba said: "Monster cannot be summoned in this point arrow". If you realize, this card arrow pointer to your opponent field (if place in extra monster zone). So, it will limit the opponent monster zone, look like "Ground Collapse" or "Ojama King" Then it appears there is a mistake in the text: Monsters cannot be Summoned in your zone(s) this card point to. That is what got me confused. In that case, that would allow Red-Eyes to play the Kashtira Zone lock game. But I'm still unsure about dedicating a Deck to summoning 3+ different Red-Eyes to follow it up with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yᵤₘₐ ₖₐᵢbₐ Posted August 17, 2023 Author Report Share Posted August 17, 2023 14 hours ago, Darj said: Then it appears there is a mistake in the text: Monsters cannot be Summoned in your zone(s) this card point to. Ouw, sorry sorry. monster cannot be summoned in a zone(s) this card point to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raikoh130 Posted August 19, 2023 Report Share Posted August 19, 2023 Love the effect idea, lol, but honestly, the Summoning requirements should be easier since Red-Eyes struggles enough already, while nerfing its protection effect. Here are my suggestions: For the Summoning Requirement:3 monsters including 2 Red-Eyes monsters with different levels, except "Red-Eyes B. Chick" Ojamas can get Ojama Knight/King with just a simple fusion, why should this be any different? This helps make it more used, since Red-Eyes has a ton of Level 7 monsters, while continuing to make your opponent to get rid of "Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon", should they choose to splash that engine into their deck. For the protection effect:This card cannot be targeted by your opponent's card effects.ORThis card cannot be destroyed by your opponent's card effects. This allows it to remain a strong effect without it being too much for your opponent to get rid of it, since it is now easier to Link Summon the card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yᵤₘₐ ₖₐᵢbₐ Posted August 20, 2023 Author Report Share Posted August 20, 2023 10 hours ago, Raikoh130 said: Love the effect idea, lol, but honestly, the Summoning requirements should be easier since Red-Eyes struggles enough already, while nerfing its protection effect. Here are my suggestions: For the Summoning Requirement:3 monsters including 2 Red-Eyes monsters with different levels, except "Red-Eyes B. Chick" Ojamas can get Ojama Knight/King with just a simple fusion, why should this be any different? This helps make it more used, since Red-Eyes has a ton of Level 7 monsters, while continuing to make your opponent to get rid of "Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon", should they choose to splash that engine into their deck. For the protection effect:This card cannot be targeted by your opponent's card effects.ORThis card cannot be destroyed by your opponent's card effects. This allows it to remain a strong effect without it being too much for your opponent to get rid of it, since it is now easier to Link Summon the card. I like the suggest for summoning requirement. But i still with my card protection. Thank's for your suggest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan Posted August 20, 2023 Report Share Posted August 20, 2023 Alright this card is okay the Exosister Link still pisses me off though like you ever listen to me at least I slap a hard OPT but you make them all Soft Once Per Turns where they can be looped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raikoh130 Posted August 20, 2023 Report Share Posted August 20, 2023 1 hour ago, Yuma Kaiba said: I like the suggest for summoning requirement. But i still with my card protection. Thank's for your suggest. No problemo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yᵤₘₐ ₖₐᵢbₐ Posted August 20, 2023 Author Report Share Posted August 20, 2023 1 hour ago, Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan said: Alright this card is okay the Exosister Link still pisses me off though like you ever listen to me at least I slap a hard OPT but you make them all Soft Once Per Turns where they can be looped. I think you had a problem with "Exosister Archetype". Hehe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.