Exosister Rosalina (Written)

[Yᵤₘₐ ₖₐᵢbₐ]

Exosister Rosalina (LIGHT)

[Warrior/Link/Effect]

ATK/1800  Link Rating 2 [  ↙↘  ]

2 "Exosister" monster with different names

(Quick Effect): When Xyz Monster Summoned to your zone(s) this card point to: You can target 1 card in your opponent GY; banish that target face-down (this is treated as opponent moves a card(s) out of GY). You can only activate this effect once per turn.

 

 

[Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan]

@Yuma Kaiba No Hand Rip makes it too broken and none of its effects are an true HOPT you need to massivly nerf this card also attaching an Opponets monster on top of bring back a Monster on a Link 1 regardless if it has to be an XYZ with 2 materials Charlies Link is harder to summon also bonce this crap down from 2800 ATK to 2500 ATK and make the attch from opponets GY and not field.

Final Rating 3/10. Overpowered and its not a high Link Rating or too hard to summon Exosisters can esaily put a Rank 4 on the field easily.

No monsters have more then 3 effect they mostly have just 3 effects also card ripping/hand lopping the opponent is not allowed you can thank Toplogic Gumblar Dragon.

@Sleepy Is the hand rip OP cause both Duo and Gumblar are banned for doing this and it banishes of all things why!!! also its a Quick Effect on an non Hard Once per turn unlike Gumblar Dragon where it can only use 1 effect a turn and only once that turn what!!!! where you thinking that effect is too OP the omni negate is all right but I damnd you get rid of that damn hand rip effect cause hand rips are not banned think about Smoke Grande that card is banned and it is a suckie equip.

[Yᵤₘₐ ₖₐᵢbₐ]

27 minutes ago, Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan said:

@Yuma Kaiba No Hand Rip makes it too broken and none of its effects are an true HOPT you need to massivly nerf this card also attaching an Opponets monster on top of bring back a Monster on a Link 1 regardless if it has to be an XYZ with 2 materials Charlies Link is harder to summon also bonce this crap down from 2800 ATK to 2500 ATK and make the attch from opponets GY and not field.

Final Rating 3/10. Overpowered and its not a high Link Rating or too hard to summon Exosisters can esaily put a Rank 4 on the field easily.

No monsters have more then 3 effect they mostly have just 3 effects also card ripping/hand lopping the opponent is not allowed you can thank Toplogic Gumblar Dragon.

@Sleepy Is the hand rip OP cause both Duo and Gumblar are banned for doing this and it banishes of all things why!!! also its a Quick Effect on an non Hard Once per turn unlike Gumblar Dragon where it can only use 1 effect a turn and only once that turn what!!!! where you thinking that effect is too OP the omni negate is all right but I damnd you get rid of that damn hand rip effect cause hand rips are not banned think about Smoke Grande that card is banned and it is a suckie equip.

Cause of this card, "Exosister" archetype will be a Tier 0 deck. Hehehe

[Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan]

2 minutes ago, Yuma Kaiba said:

Cause of this card, "Exosister" archetype will be a Tier 0 deck. Hehehe

No they don't need to be Teir 0 this is part of an Archtype this card needs to be nerfed you know get this card would never be printed but it would get banned before it got the chance to see play so just nerf it. I call bull$h!t I don't want Exosisters to be Teir 0 I don't even want them to be META. They should stay semi-META but never Teir 1 or 0.

@Sleepy Is this Overpowered

[Yᵤₘₐ ₖₐᵢbₐ]

13 minutes ago, Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan said:

No they don't need to be Teir 0 this is part of an Archtype this card needs to be nerfed you know get this card would never be printed but it would get banned before it got the chance to see play so just nerf it. I call bull$h!t I don't want Exosisters to be Teir 0 I don't even want them to be META. They should stay semi-META but never Teir 1 or 0.

@Sleepy Is this Overpowered

Zeehahahahahahaha

Like i said, is hard to make Balance card, is easy to make OP card.

[Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan]

@Yuma Kaiba wait you just broke one of the sites rules @The Nyx Avatar will get very upset cause you posted in Realistic I had to report you for that cause unbalaced cards belong in the Cusal Seletction Realstic is only for balanced cards so I just reported you for that enjoy! I don't even do that!

[Yᵤₘₐ ₖₐᵢbₐ]

4 minutes ago, Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan said:

@Yuma Kaiba wait you just broke one of the sites rules @The Nyx Avatar will get very upset cause you posted in Realistic I had to report you for that cause unbalaced cards belong in the Cusal Seletction Realstic is only for balanced cards so I just reported you for that enjoy! I don't even do that!

Unbalanced ? Really ?

Normal Monster like Blue-Eyes monster can easily destroy this card.

[Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan]

1 minute ago, Yuma Kaiba said:

Unbalanced ? Really ?

Normal Monster like Blue-Eyes monster can easily destroy this card.

WHAT THE FUCK NO! YOU BROKE THE RULES ALSO YOUR CARDS SHOULD ME MERGED WITH NYX OP CARDS JOKE THREAD Read the Rules also Nyx is going to be very upset I just reported you!

 

[Yᵤₘₐ ₖₐᵢbₐ]

9 minutes ago, Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan said:

WHAT THE FUCK NO! YOU BROKE THE RULES ALSO YOUR CARDS SHOULD ME MERGED WITH NYX OP CARDS JOKE THREAD Read the Rules also Nyx is going to be very upset I just reported you!

No problem if you dont like my custom card, its Legal.

[Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan]

3 hours ago, Yuma Kaiba said:

No problem if you dont like my custom card, its Legal.

Yeah your a hipercrite about the Dragon!!! How is that fair also their are rules Nyx told me.

[Raikoh130]

Dang, this card is way too overpowered for a Link-1 monster. The cost to Link Summon it is small compared to what effects it does.

Its quite easy to get up to 2 of her out right on your first turn, which the Level 4 monsters are Special Summoning each other from the hand or Deck (depends on the monster). Just use her effects and Link Summon her again with the other Xyz Monster(s). Really powerful to rip your opponent's field apart if you go second.

You get the Xyz monster, that you used to Summon this card, back right away, then you rip a monster from your opponents field onto that monster as Material (and it doesn't target it to boot), then you can get a free negate with that material. That's crazy broken effect alone. You just -2 your opponent with little effort. Plus, if you attack with that Xyz monster, you can Xyz Summon Zeus afterwards and have another broken effect ready to make it harder for your opponent to comeback.

Also, you added a deck fattening effect by them losing a card in their Graveyard, while banishing a card from their hand. Another -2 for your opponent. Not to mention the fact that this is a Quick-Effect, so you can do this during your opponent's Draw Phase, which is insanely powerful since you can banish the Material you used to negate one of their effects.

This card hits your opponent with an up to a -4 disadvantage, while you only take a really tiny -1 cost (for a Material on an Xyz Monster for crying out loud), Add to boot that there is no "You can only use each effect of "Exosister Rosalina" once per turn and only once that turn" clause on it so you can do this up to 3 times in a single turn, meaning up to a -12 disadvantage for your opponent for a total of -3 Materials you had to lose.

How in the world is a 'up to a +9 advantage' turn fair?! There's a reason why Maxx "C" is still banned in the TCG because of this.

Plus, add in the fact that this is a 2800 ATK Link-1 Monster, which is way too high of an ATK. Even Link-3 monsters don't have an ATK so high. It should be around 1000-2000 ATK at most. It could be higher but with these powerful effects, the low ATK justifiable. Give your opponent a chance to just wipe it out by battle. If you have a hard OPT on it, then raise it to a higher ATK, but not above 2500.

Sure, a BEWD can destroy it by battle, but you have already disadvantaged them to death so they have little options to fight back. Plus, it doesn't have a hard OPT effect, so you can just do it again that turn. So, how are they fighting back when you've already stopped them from bringing it out in the first place?!

This would be an Exosister Tier 0 Mirror Match format, and many people would take breaks from playing until that card is banned.

And, no, this isn't about liking a card or not. Realistically, this card wouldn't even make it long before it got banned on the Forbidden List. Sure, it'll sell boxes at first but it wouldn't last too long if they aren't getting many sales afterwards. I get that you like Exosister but come on, make a more balanced support(s) for it. All the other Exosisters have the OPT clause on it, what makes this card so special that it shouldn't have it? The summoning requirement? It isn't hard getting those Xyz monsters on the field, honestly.

[The Nyx Avatar]

Alright. I'm here to chime in. My big concern is that last effect of banishing an opponent's card from their hand. Now, I adore banishing. But I also know how crippling hitting your opponent's hand can be. For that last effect, minimum, needs a strict "once per turn" clause. 

16 hours ago, Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan said:

WHAT THE FUCK NO! YOU BROKE THE RULES ALSO YOUR CARDS SHOULD ME MERGED WITH NYX OP CARDS JOKE THREAD Read the Rules also Nyx is going to be very upset I just reported you!

 

Also, please Zama. Don't minimod. You weren't exactly the paragon of balanced cards

[Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan]

Just now, The Nyx Avatar said:

Alright. I'm here to chime in. My big concern is that last effect of banishing an opponent's card from their hand. Now, I adore banishing. But I also know how crippling hitting your opponent's hand can be. For that last effect, minimum, needs a strict "once per turn" clause. 

Also, please Zama. Don't minimod. You weren't exactly the paragon of balanced cards

Yeah but atlaest I don't post in the Realistic Selection I put them in the Causal Selection not in the Realistic Selection where cards are suppose to be made balanced for the TCG/OCG. shouldn't this thread be atlaest in the Causal Selection?

[Sleepy]

I heard the call and to be honest, felt a bit lazy about coming here xD
Too many posts to catch up to, and I'm not as knowledgeable about Exosisters.

Hmm on one hand, it sounds like a bad starter because Exosisters would prefer to be 1-Material Xyzs
On the other hand, everything else is super busted.
The omni negate is not once per turn and doesn't care which Xyzs you are detaching from so it could negate 15 times in a turn on a good day.
The card reviving the Xyz undoes the cost of it being Summoned and gets an opponent's monster out of the way while at it, essentially being better than free.
It quick cripples both GY and hand from your opponent but in a way that doesn't even contribute to improving the archetype's shortcomings
The ATK stat looks more like something that'd belong to a LINK 3 monster, not a 1. 

I'm gonna re-make the card to make my suggestions clearer and then I'll explain xD

Exosister Rosalina
LIGHT LINK 1 [ Warrior / Link / Effect ] 1800 ATK  [Arrow: Down]
1 monster
The turn this card is Link Summoned, if an "Exosister" monster(s) would be destroyed, banished, or Tributed by an opponent's card, you can Tribute this card instead. Can also be Link Summoned by using 1card attached to "Exosister" Xyz Monsters you control as material (you can only Link Summon "Exosister Rosalina" once per turn this way). If Summoned this way, target 1 face-up card your opponent controls, and its effect becomes the following.
*Attach this card to an "Exosister" Xyz Monster your opponent controls, and if you do, both players Special Summon 1 monster from their GY, but negate your monster's effect.
 

^So
-Brought the ATK down 1k,
-Material is generic but effect requires the usage of the archetype so it's the same thing
-Doesn't omni-negate a million times per turn but it'll protect your combo and let it happen
-it'll in a way "negate" 1 card by forcing its effect to change and attaching it to your other cards, and reviving 1 monster on each side. This helps you extend your field while it also triggers the Exosister's requirements for the 1- card Xyz Summons.

Obviously, it's nowhere near as powerful as your card but I do think your card does too much xD
PD: 3 or 4 posts happened while I was writing this. 
I need to note my post here is not meant to be taken as me telling you that you should do my suggestions exactly (I maybe even overbalanced the card) but well... I do think your card goes a bit overboard. It sounds like a detail here and a detail there kept piling up and your full card looks a lot more OP than maybe intended.

3 minutes ago, Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan said:

Yeah but atlaest I don't post in the Realistic Selection I put them in the Causal Selection not in the Realistic Selection where cards are suppose to be made balanced for the TCG/OCG. shouldn't this thread be atlaest in the Causal Selection?

Please don't look for fights. Try to keep the chat civil. Don't jump to "I report you". The card is unbalanced but one can tell it wasn't made as a joke card, it was made intending to catapult the archetype to top tier status, and that's not all that easy to measure.

[Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan]

3 minutes ago, Sleepy said:

I heard the call and to be honest, felt a bit lazy about coming here xD
Too many posts to catch up to, and I'm not as knowledgeable about Exosisters.

Hmm on one hand, it sounds like a bad starter because Exosisters would prefer to be 1-Material Xyzs
On the other hand, everything else is super busted.
The omni negate is not once per turn and doesn't care which Xyzs you are detaching from so it could negate 15 times in a turn on a good day.
The card reviving the Xyz undoes the cost of it being Summoned and gets an opponent's monster out of the way while at it, essentially being better than free.
It quick cripples both GY and hand from your opponent but in a way that doesn't even contribute to improving the archetype's shortcomings
The ATK stat looks more like something that'd belong to a LINK 3 monster, not a 1. 

I'm gonna re-make the card to make my suggestions clearer and then I'll explain xD

Exosister Rosalina
LIGHT LINK 1 [ Warrior / Link / Effect ] 1800 ATK  [Arrow: Down]
1 monster
The turn this card is Link Summoned, if an "Exosister" monster(s) would be destroyed, banished, or Tributed by an opponent's card, you can Tribute this card instead. Can also be Link Summoned by using 1card attached to "Exosister" Xyz Monsters you control as material (you can only Link Summon "Exosister Rosalina" once per turn this way). If Summoned this way, target 1 face-up card your opponent controls, and its effect becomes the following.
*Attach this card to an "Exosister" Xyz Monster your opponent controls, and if you do, both players Special Summon 1 monster from their GY, but negate your monster's effect.
 

^So
-Brought the ATK down 1k,
-Material is generic but effect requires the usage of the archetype so it's the same thing
-Doesn't omni-negate a million times per turn but it'll protect your combo and let it happen
-it'll in a way "negate" 1 card by forcing its effect to change and attaching it to your other cards, and reviving 1 monster on each side. This helps you extend your field while it also triggers the Exosister's requirements for the 1- card Xyz Summons.

Obviously, it's nowhere near as powerful as your card but I do think your card does too much xD
PD: 3 or 4 posts happened while I was writing this. 
I need to note my post here is not meant to be taken as me telling you that you should do my suggestions exactly (I maybe even overbalanced the card) but well... I do think your card goes a bit overboard. It sounds like a detail here and a detail there kept piling up and your full card looks a lot more OP than maybe intended.

Please don't look for fights. Try to keep the chat civil. Don't jump to "I report you". The card is unbalanced but one can tell it wasn't made as a joke card, it was made intending to catapult the archetype to top tier status, and that's not all that easy to measure.

Nyx has an Thread called OP and Joke Cards Thread cause OP Cards.

[Sleepy]

20 minutes ago, Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan said:

Nyx has an Thread called OP and Joke Cards Thread cause OP Cards.

That thread is for cards INTENTIONALLY made to be jokes or broken.
This card was not made with that intention. The aim was to boost an archetype to top tier status but still be something that could exist in the game.
You identified that it is overpowered, but didn't offer any suggestions or solutions, you just jumped to "it should be a joke thread card".  I disagree.
Jumping the gun like that before any other alternatives are explored (and reporting the thread from there) is kind of an insult to the card maker trying to make an actually believable card. 

You can make a single post where you say "I think it's broken" but if you push it just to keep pushing without offering how to fix it and just go to report it, that's NOT what you should be aiming for. 

You will know when a card really is an OP/Joke card, you'll see those 9999 ATK DIVINE monsters that win the game twice in a single effect. You can't miss those. This card is not that.
 

[The Nyx Avatar]

15 minutes ago, Sleepy said:

That thread is for cards INTENTIONALLY made to be jokes or broken.

You will know when a card really is an OP/Joke card, you'll see those 9999 ATK DIVINE monsters that win the game twice in a single effect. You can't miss those. This card is not that.
 

This. So much this.

Most of the cards in that thread are for low effort or zero effort. Cards with unrealistic stats, non-existent stats, not taking feedback, users who had no intention to further engage with the forum.

 

This card...doesn't fall into that subcategory

18 minutes ago, Sleepy said:

This card was not made with that intention. The aim was to boost an archetype to top tier status but still be something that could exist in the game.
You identified that it is overpowered, but didn't offer any suggestions or solutions, you just jumped to "it should be a joke thread card".  I disagree.
Jumping the gun like that before any other alternatives are explored (and reporting the thread from there) is kind of an insult to the card maker trying to make an actually believable card. 

You can make a single post where you say "I think it's broken" but if you push it just to keep pushing without offering how to fix it and just go to report it, that's NOT what you should be aiming for. 

Precisely! This kind of behavior should generally be deterred.

Constructive criticism is how you should first approach a card

[Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan]

8 minutes ago, The Nyx Avatar said:

This. So much this.

Most of the cards in that thread are for low effort or zero effort. Cards with unrealistic stats, non-existent stats, not taking feedback, users who had no intention to further engage with the forum.

 

This card...doesn't fall into that subcategory

Precisely! This kind of behavior should generally be deterred.

Constructive criticism is how you should first approach a card

Yeah but shouldn't this card be in Causal Section and not in the Realistic cause he showed no signs of wanting to nerf it or balancing it out. How come this card can stay in the Realistic Section Thomas★Zero makes balanced cards by defualt and I get why he can put them in Realistic but why can't you move this to Causal.

[Sleepy]

20 minutes ago, Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan said:

Yeah but shouldn't this card be in Causal Section and not in the Realistic cause he showed no signs of wanting to nerf it or balancing it out. How come this card can stay in the Realistic Section Thomas★Zero makes balanced cards by defualt and I get why he can put them in Realistic but why can't you move this to Causal.

You told him it's broken.
So what was your suggestion?
You don't NEED to give a constructive suggestion if you are just casually throwing your thoughts on it, but if you don't, don't expect or demand anything.
So you kept pushing for some sort of change..... since you did, now you NEED a suggestion. Otherwise you are just saying "this sucks" and nothing more.

What is the card's owner supposed to do? Go all: "oh no I didn't know it was broken I'll make it not broken now thanks it was so much help :v "?
Give him something to work with if you are gonna keep insisting.

Even then you shouldn't be demanding things around here. You be polite. You be respectful.
Once you do all these things (which you did not), if the other person still feels adamant on not listening to anything (which he has not been yet, you haven't given anything to work with to begin with) and going all "broken's the way I like it babe", then you just disengage. You stop giving people like that attention. I know I stopped reviewing your cards back in the day when you got all "NO I WON'T CHANGE ANYTHING BECAUSE IT'D BE AN ERRATA IF I DID SO I WON'T NO". 

Don't jump the gun, just chill. 
Thomas tends to be very good at card making. He's been doing it since I was a new member. You don't have to be on his level to want to make a card realistic. If you have the intention of making something realistic but you lack the skills for it, that's what feedback is for. That's why I throw these page-long essays on cards even though I haven't been in a tournament for a decade and just follow casually. Thomas's cards have nothing to do with this thread. You can just tell what this card's intention was. Take it from Nyx, and take it from me. It sounds like it's not well balanced but it can be. Have you seen what ExPurrely Noir can do? That thing sounds more like a joke card than this...... yet here we are.

 

[Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan]

4 minutes ago, Sleepy said:

You told him it's broken.
So what was your suggestion?
You don't NEED to give a constructive suggestion if you are just casually throwing your thoughts on it, but if you don't, don't expect or demand anything.
So you kept pushing for some sort of change..... since you did, now you NEED a suggestion. Otherwise you are just saying "this sucks" and nothing more.

What is the card's owner supposed to do? Go all: "oh no I didn't know it was broken I'll make it not broken now thanks it was so much help :v "?
Give him something to work with if you are gonna keep insisting.

Even then you shouldn't be demanding things around here. You be polite. You be respectful.
Once you do all these things (which you did not), if the other person still feels adamant on not listening to anything (which he has not been yet, you haven't given anything to work with to begin with) and going all "broken's the way I like it babe", then you just disengage. You stop giving people like that attention. I know I stopped reviewing your cards back in the day when you got all "NO I WON'T CHANGE ANYTHING BECAUSE IT'D BE AN ERRATA IF I DID SO I WON'T NO". 

Don't jump the gun, just chill. 
Thomas tends to be very good at card making. He's been doing it since I was a new member. You don't have to be on his level to want to make a card realistic. If you have the intention of making something realistic but you lack the skills for it, that's what feedback is for. That's why I throw these page-long essays on cards even though I haven't been in a tournament for a decade and just follow casually. Thomas's cards have nothing to do with this thread. You can just tell what this card's intention was. Take it from Nyx, and take it from me. It sounds like it's not well balanced but it can be. Have you seen what ExPurrely Noir can do? That thing sounds more like a joke card than this...... yet here we are.

 

Fine I'm sorry I will Chill.

[Raikoh130]

4 hours ago, Sleepy said:

I heard the call and to be honest, felt a bit lazy about coming here xD
Too many posts to catch up to, and I'm not as knowledgeable about Exosisters.

Hmm on one hand, it sounds like a bad starter because Exosisters would prefer to be 1-Material Xyzs
On the other hand, everything else is super busted.
The omni negate is not once per turn and doesn't care which Xyzs you are detaching from so it could negate 15 times in a turn on a good day.
The card reviving the Xyz undoes the cost of it being Summoned and gets an opponent's monster out of the way while at it, essentially being better than free.
It quick cripples both GY and hand from your opponent but in a way that doesn't even contribute to improving the archetype's shortcomings
The ATK stat looks more like something that'd belong to a LINK 3 monster, not a 1. 

I'm gonna re-make the card to make my suggestions clearer and then I'll explain xD

Exosister Rosalina
LIGHT LINK 1 [ Warrior / Link / Effect ] 1800 ATK  [Arrow: Down]
1 monster
The turn this card is Link Summoned, if an "Exosister" monster(s) would be destroyed, banished, or Tributed by an opponent's card, you can Tribute this card instead. Can also be Link Summoned by using 1card attached to "Exosister" Xyz Monsters you control as material (you can only Link Summon "Exosister Rosalina" once per turn this way). If Summoned this way, target 1 face-up card your opponent controls, and its effect becomes the following.
*Attach this card to an "Exosister" Xyz Monster your opponent controls, and if you do, both players Special Summon 1 monster from their GY, but negate your monster's effect.
 

^So
-Brought the ATK down 1k,
-Material is generic but effect requires the usage of the archetype so it's the same thing
-Doesn't omni-negate a million times per turn but it'll protect your combo and let it happen
-it'll in a way "negate" 1 card by forcing its effect to change and attaching it to your other cards, and reviving 1 monster on each side. This helps you extend your field while it also triggers the Exosister's requirements for the 1- card Xyz Summons.

That's a good edit. The poster's version was a -4 for your opponent right off the bat for a loss of 1 Material. Getting that advantage was worth the loss of an Exosister's Xyz monster, plus you can still use it anyway and forget about the negate. This is way more fair. I also hope I didn't get too aggressive with my OG comment.

[Yᵤₘₐ ₖₐᵢbₐ]

5 hours ago, Sleepy said:

I heard the call and to be honest, felt a bit lazy about coming here xD
Too many posts to catch up to, and I'm not as knowledgeable about Exosisters.

Hmm on one hand, it sounds like a bad starter because Exosisters would prefer to be 1-Material Xyzs
On the other hand, everything else is super busted.
The omni negate is not once per turn and doesn't care which Xyzs you are detaching from so it could negate 15 times in a turn on a good day.
The card reviving the Xyz undoes the cost of it being Summoned and gets an opponent's monster out of the way while at it, essentially being better than free.
It quick cripples both GY and hand from your opponent but in a way that doesn't even contribute to improving the archetype's shortcomings
The ATK stat looks more like something that'd belong to a LINK 3 monster, not a 1. 

I'm gonna re-make the card to make my suggestions clearer and then I'll explain xD

Exosister Rosalina
LIGHT LINK 1 [ Warrior / Link / Effect ] 1800 ATK  [Arrow: Down]
1 monster
The turn this card is Link Summoned, if an "Exosister" monster(s) would be destroyed, banished, or Tributed by an opponent's card, you can Tribute this card instead. Can also be Link Summoned by using 1card attached to "Exosister" Xyz Monsters you control as material (you can only Link Summon "Exosister Rosalina" once per turn this way). If Summoned this way, target 1 face-up card your opponent controls, and its effect becomes the following.
*Attach this card to an "Exosister" Xyz Monster your opponent controls, and if you do, both players Special Summon 1 monster from their GY, but negate your monster's effect.
 

^So
-Brought the ATK down 1k,
-Material is generic but effect requires the usage of the archetype so it's the same thing
-Doesn't omni-negate a million times per turn but it'll protect your combo and let it happen
-it'll in a way "negate" 1 card by forcing its effect to change and attaching it to your other cards, and reviving 1 monster on each side. This helps you extend your field while it also triggers the Exosister's requirements for the 1- card Xyz Summons.

Obviously, it's nowhere near as powerful as your card but I do think your card does too much xD
PD: 3 or 4 posts happened while I was writing this. 
I need to note my post here is not meant to be taken as me telling you that you should do my suggestions exactly (I maybe even overbalanced the card) but well... I do think your card goes a bit overboard. It sounds like a detail here and a detail there kept piling up and your full card looks a lot more OP than maybe intended.

Please don't look for fights. Try to keep the chat civil. Don't jump to "I report you". The card is unbalanced but one can tell it wasn't made as a joke card, it was made intending to catapult the archetype to top tier status, and that's not all that easy to measure.

Im appreciate that.

[Yᵤₘₐ ₖₐᵢbₐ]

6 hours ago, Raikoh130 said:

Dang, this card is way too overpowered for a Link-1 monster. The cost to Link Summon it is small compared to what effects it does.

Its quite easy to get up to 2 of her out right on your first turn, which the Level 4 monsters are Special Summoning each other from the hand or Deck (depends on the monster). Just use her effects and Link Summon her again with the other Xyz Monster(s). Really powerful to rip your opponent's field apart if you go second.

You get the Xyz monster, that you used to Summon this card, back right away, then you rip a monster from your opponents field onto that monster as Material (and it doesn't target it to boot), then you can get a free negate with that material. That's crazy broken effect alone. You just -2 your opponent with little effort. Plus, if you attack with that Xyz monster, you can Xyz Summon Zeus afterwards and have another broken effect ready to make it harder for your opponent to comeback.

Also, you added a deck fattening effect by them losing a card in their Graveyard, while banishing a card from their hand. Another -2 for your opponent. Not to mention the fact that this is a Quick-Effect, so you can do this during your opponent's Draw Phase, which is insanely powerful since you can banish the Material you used to negate one of their effects.

This card hits your opponent with an up to a -4 disadvantage, while you only take a really tiny -1 cost (for a Material on an Xyz Monster for crying out loud), Add to boot that there is no "You can only use each effect of "Exosister Rosalina" once per turn and only once that turn" clause on it so you can do this up to 3 times in a single turn, meaning up to a -12 disadvantage for your opponent for a total of -3 Materials you had to lose.

How in the world is a 'up to a +9 advantage' turn fair?! There's a reason why Maxx "C" is still banned in the TCG because of this.

Plus, add in the fact that this is a 2800 ATK Link-1 Monster, which is way too high of an ATK. Even Link-3 monsters don't have an ATK so high. It should be around 1000-2000 ATK at most. It could be higher but with these powerful effects, the low ATK justifiable. Give your opponent a chance to just wipe it out by battle. If you have a hard OPT on it, then raise it to a higher ATK, but not above 2500.

Sure, a BEWD can destroy it by battle, but you have already disadvantaged them to death so they have little options to fight back. Plus, it doesn't have a hard OPT effect, so you can just do it again that turn. So, how are they fighting back when you've already stopped them from bringing it out in the first place?!

This would be an Exosister Tier 0 Mirror Match format, and many people would take breaks from playing until that card is banned.

And, no, this isn't about liking a card or not. Realistically, this card wouldn't even make it long before it got banned on the Forbidden List. Sure, it'll sell boxes at first but it wouldn't last too long if they aren't getting many sales afterwards. I get that you like Exosister but come on, make a more balanced support(s) for it. All the other Exosisters have the OPT clause on it, what makes this card so special that it shouldn't have it? The summoning requirement? It isn't hard getting those Xyz monsters on the field, honestly.

Im appreciate that.

[Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan]

So why is the card still not edit it still has a hand rip effect.

[Yᵤₘₐ ₖₐᵢbₐ]

On 8/12/2023 at 4:01 AM, Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan said:

So why is the card still not edit it still has a hand rip effect.

I make with picture, if i want to edit, i must edit with picture too. Its take to much time. "This card considering as Banlist custom card".

Zehahaahaha