Bradley Shewell Posted June 23, 2021 Report Share Posted June 23, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokutah Posted June 24, 2021 Report Share Posted June 24, 2021 there a bit of wording problem but for most part is still understanable. however, there some weird design choice here if these should work in the same way as Kaiju then it should use the exact same wording: You can Special Summon this card (from your hand) to your opponent's field in Attack Position, by Tributing 1 monster they control. If your opponent controls a "Kaiju" monster, you can Special Summon this card (from your hand) in Attack Position. You can only control 1 "Kaiju" monster. the effects in bold above is important for 2 reason: 1) its important that the infamous "kaiju summon" distinctly says "tributing 1 monster you control" since normaly you supposed to unable to do that 2) sure these "Unknown Kaiju" is a sub-archetype of pre-existing Kaiju but since it share the same "Kaiju" naming convention you dont need to mention "Unknown Kaiju". it already count as Kaiju now to individual cards: Deep Sea: sac it self for search pretty decent Underground: it kinda like gamaciel if you dont get one, not the worst Smoke vs Volcano: these 2 are dilemma, Smokes is clearly inferior version of Volcano so you dont really want to run it. but Volcano is a bit too good . rule of thumb in yugioh game, never let effect that summon from your deck nearly free Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.