Blue Eyes support

[Ray.]

If you have any suggestions opinions write it here

[Loleo]

God- balanced, I would give it a GY effect also like "If an "Obelisk the Tormenter" you control is destroyed by battle or card effect you can banish this card from the GY; special summon an "Eyes of Blue" monster from your deck.  

Destruction- seems like an alternate alternate. Here is how I would word it, "Once per a turn: you can target one monster on the field; destroy it. If this card..." the key parts being adding the period separating the effects, the : and ;

Blue eyes rainbow should always be treated as an ultimate crystal beast and blue eyes monster, the ATK boost is way too low for a boss monster how about 100-200 for every blue eyes and crystal beast you control (except this card?), and maybe make the tag out effect a quick effect.

 

[Ray.]

About the rainbow dragon effect I thought if I made the ATK boost high it will be op and those monsters have good ATK points anyway

15 minutes ago, ITSUKOSOADO said:

God- balanced, I would give it a GY effect also like "If an "Obelisk the Tormenter" you control is destroyed by battle or card effect you can banish this card from the GY; special summon an "Eyes of Blue" monster from your deck.  

Destruction- seems like an alternate alternate. Here is how I would word it, "Once per a turn: you can target one monster on the field; destroy it. If this card..." the key parts being adding the period separating the effects, the : and ;

Blue eyes rainbow should always be treated as an ultimate crystal beast and blue eyes monster, the ATK boost is way too low for a boss monster how about 100-200 for every blue eyes and crystal beast you control (except this card?), and maybe make the tag out effect a quick effect.

 

 

[Loleo]

4 minutes ago, IBRAHIM THE LEGEND said:

About the rainbow dragon effect I thought if I made the ATK boost high it will be op and those monsters have good ATK points anyway

 

It wouldn't ATK point gain cards are useless if they don't pack a punch, if you did it at 100 for each you control it would be 1100ATK each and that is if your spell trap zone is full of them. If you want you can say "with different names" or "excluding this card" the regular crystal beasts have 1200ATK on average and with this system you would still rarely have a board full of crystal beast/blue eyes not to mention they don't have great synergy. At the end of the day it is your choice, play out a few scenarios, have fun!

[Ray.]

7 minutes ago, ITSUKOSOADO said:

It wouldn't ATK point gain cards are useless if they don't pack a punch, if you did it at 100 for each you control it would be 1100ATK each and that is if your spell trap zone is full of them. If you want you can say "with different names" or "excluding this card" the regular crystal beasts have 1200ATK on average and with this system you would still rarely have a board full of crystal beast/blue eyes not to mention they don't have great synergy. At the end of the day it is your choice, play out a few scenarios, have fun!

Thanks for your opinion

[Baron-777]

A God with Eyes of Blue: Feels kinda ironic when Obelisk was the one tributed in the anime for blue-eyes. I feel like for balance, it should be from the hand, not the deck. Given Blue-Eyes are REALLY easy to swarm with. Maybe add a graveyard effect where you can banish it; Divine Beast monsters do not have to activate their effects during the End Phase that would send them to the GY.

Blue-Eyes Destruction Dragon: Personal opinion, I like the sound of "Blue-Eyes Destruction Burst Dragon" or just "Blue-Eyes Burst Dragon" given its signature attack is "Burst Stream of Destruction" (White Lightning in English Dub). Tangent aside, this is literally just an upgrade of Blue-Eyes Alternative White Dragon. Minus the Special Summon condition. My only balance would be to have the destruction be by an opponent's card.

Blue-Eyes Rainbow Dragon: Well first you don't need a Cannot be Normal Summoned/Set clause on Extra Deck monsters; as that is by their design. That summoning condition is HARSH without fusion substitutes, getting a Rainbow Dragon on the field is hard, especially if you're trying to mash Crystal Beasts and Blue-Eyes properly. I feel like the passive ATK gain for other monsters seems not thematic for Blue-Eyes or Rainbow Dragon. If you wanna continue this route I'd bump the ATK gain to at least 500 per crystal beast. Honestly if you wanna go full ham, I'd do it like this: "Gains 500 ATK for each Crystal Beast on the field or in the Spell/Trap Zone. This card can attack a number of times equal to the number of "Blue-Eyes" monsters you control. Other monsters you control cannot attack the turn you attack with this monster." The tag out is fine as well, but as a quick effect.

 

[Ray.]

On 5/29/2021 at 7:40 AM, Baron-777 said:

A God with Eyes of Blue: Feels kinda ironic when Obelisk was the one tributed in the anime for blue-eyes. I feel like for balance, it should be from the hand, not the deck. Given Blue-Eyes are REALLY easy to swarm with. Maybe add a graveyard effect where you can banish it; Divine Beast monsters do not have to activate their effects during the End Phase that would send them to the GY.

Blue-Eyes Destruction Dragon: Personal opinion, I like the sound of "Blue-Eyes Destruction Burst Dragon" or just "Blue-Eyes Burst Dragon" given its signature attack is "Burst Stream of Destruction" (White Lightning in English Dub). Tangent aside, this is literally just an upgrade of Blue-Eyes Alternative White Dragon. Minus the Special Summon condition. My only balance would be to have the destruction be by an opponent's card.

Blue-Eyes Rainbow Dragon: Well first you don't need a Cannot be Normal Summoned/Set clause on Extra Deck monsters; as that is by their design. That summoning condition is HARSH without fusion substitutes, getting a Rainbow Dragon on the field is hard, especially if you're trying to mash Crystal Beasts and Blue-Eyes properly. I feel like the passive ATK gain for other monsters seems not thematic for Blue-Eyes or Rainbow Dragon. If you wanna continue this route I'd bump the ATK gain to at least 500 per crystal beast. Honestly if you wanna go full ham, I'd do it like this: "Gains 500 ATK for each Crystal Beast on the field or in the Spell/Trap Zone. This card can attack a number of times equal to the number of "Blue-Eyes" monsters you control. Other monsters you control cannot attack the turn you attack with this monster." The tag out is fine as well, but as a quick effect.

 

Thanks for your opinion and about rainbow dragon I wanted to write can't be special summoned by other ways but I mistakenly put that

[Loleo]

On 5/28/2021 at 11:40 PM, Baron-777 said:

A God with Eyes of Blue: Feels kinda ironic when Obelisk was the one tributed in the anime for blue-eyes. I feel like for balance, it should be from the hand, not the deck. Given Blue-Eyes are REALLY easy to swarm with. Maybe add a graveyard effect where you can banish it; Divine Beast monsters do not have to activate their effects during the End Phase that would send them to the GY.

Blue-Eyes Destruction Dragon: Personal opinion, I like the sound of "Blue-Eyes Destruction Burst Dragon" or just "Blue-Eyes Burst Dragon" given its signature attack is "Burst Stream of Destruction" (White Lightning in English Dub). Tangent aside, this is literally just an upgrade of Blue-Eyes Alternative White Dragon. Minus the Special Summon condition. My only balance would be to have the destruction be by an opponent's card.

 

Blue-Eyes Rainbow Dragon: Well first you don't need a Cannot be Normal Summoned/Set clause on Extra Deck monsters; as that is by their design. That summoning condition is HARSH without fusion substitutes, getting a Rainbow Dragon on the field is hard, especially if you're trying to mash Crystal Beasts and Blue-Eyes properly. I feel like the passive ATK gain for other monsters seems not thematic for Blue-Eyes or Rainbow Dragon. If you wanna continue this route I'd bump the ATK gain to at least 500 per crystal beast. Honestly if you wanna go full ham, I'd do it like this: "Gains 500 ATK for each Crystal Beast on the field or in the Spell/Trap Zone. This card can attack a number of times equal to the number of "Blue-Eyes" monsters you control. Other monsters you control cannot attack the turn you attack with this monster." The tag out is fine as well, but as a quick effect.

 

Feels kinda ironic when Obelisk was the one tributed in the anime for blue-eyes.- Yes.

 

Blue-Eyes Destruction Dragon-

this still has destruction from burst stream of destruction instead of burst. Also the balance isn't necessary but definitely something to consider.

 

Blue-Eyes Rainbow Dragon: Well first you don't need a Cannot be Normal Summoned/Set clause on Extra Deck monsters; as that is by their design.- Seconded

 

That summoning condition is HARSH without fusion substitutes-

I agree especially with the lack of protection this card has on the field.

 

If you wanna continue this route I'd bump the ATK gain to at least 500 per crystal beast. Honestly if you wanna go full ham, I'd do it like this: "Gains 500 ATK for each Crystal Beast on the field or in the Spell/Trap Zone.-

this suggestion can put all crystal beast to their original ATK plus 4500 not to mention amethyst cat would have 5700 ATK and could do half that directly. I would say 300 ATK per crystal beast/ blue eyes max. (you went from 200 flat to 500 per crystal beast!)

 

I stand by my previous suggestion.

[Baron-777]

@ITSUKOSOADO Ah sorry I misread the card the first time. What I meant was more in the spirit of Rainbow Dragon. That Blue-Eyes Rainbow Dragon (and only it) gains 500 ATK for each Crystal Beast and attacks for every Blue-Eyes on the field.