Jump to content

Grand Mole Offically Dead.... again


Recommended Posts

Guest Star

This card deserves to be limited.

 

Mole doesn't.

 

Mole returns itself to its owner's hand.

 

This doesn't.

 

This > Mole

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Chaos Pudding

This card deserves to be limited.

 

Mole doesn't.

 

Mole returns itself to its owner's hand.

 

This doesn't.

 

This > Mole

 

Actually, neither deserve to be Limited, to be quite honest. And this card is not automatically better than Mole. Mole hits things in both positions, while Monk only hits Defense. Mole takes no damage, while Monk does. Plenty of differences to make neither better than the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This and Mole are on completely different levels.

Mole, while limited, does not have to attack to use his effect. He will last a lot longer than this if he just sits on the field.

Altho this is not limited it's Secret Rare, meaning for the people that have money as an obstacle, they cannot get 3. It's effect can be used better in some cases, like vs a cyDra, but it still has it's downsides.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Chaos Pudding

Wait. Isn't Grand Mole limited? If so' date=' Ehren should be too in the next one.

[/quote']

 

No, neither should be limited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This card deserves to be limited.

 

Mole doesn't.

 

Mole returns itself to its owner's hand.

 

This doesn't.

 

This > Mole

 

Actually' date=' neither deserve to be Limited, to be quite honest. And this card is not automatically better than Mole. Mole hits things in both positions, while Monk only hits Defense. [b']Mole takes no damage, while Monk does.[/b] Plenty of differences to make neither better than the other.

 

It's effect is activated before the damage calculation.

 

So no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...