Horu Posted April 10, 2021 Report Share Posted April 10, 2021 Is it moral for one to vote for a candidate whom they don't support? Or to vote for a candidate that they are skeptical of? Or would it be better to withold one's vote? And at what point does voting become a moral obligation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cr47t Posted April 10, 2021 Report Share Posted April 10, 2021 i'd say the moral option isn't related to who the voter supports so much as it is about conscience - who the voter thinks is more likely or more able to improve or at least not decline the country, or state, or province or whatever (depending on what office is being run for). on that same note if no major candidates are worth it in such a sense (i would argue that was the case in 2016) i would withhold my vote, or vote for a third alternative, as i would not see redeeming factors in the bigger candidates; a vote for the 'lesser of two evils' is still, in the proverbial sense, a vote for evil EDIT: conscience also means that if one person is more likely or more able to improve the country, but would be a poor role model, i would say the vote should not go to that person, because the most overlooked (and one of the most important) duties of a leader is to be an example to those who look up to him/her Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.