Guest Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 Click here for image and effect This card cannot be destroyed by battle. This card cannot be switched to Defense Position, except with a card effect. When this card is successfully Normal Summoned, Flip Summoned or Special Summoned, toss a coin once and depending on the result, the following effect is gained:● Heads: Negate the effects of your Spell, Trap or Effect Monsters that target this card and destroy them.● Tail: Negate the effects of your opponent's Spell, Trap or Effect Monsters that target this card and destroy them. Discuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bury the year Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 The "cannot be destroyed by battle" part is a big boost, and you can Set it, right? With the Heads/Tails effects, this card is nigh-invincible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 Thats the point, got it for free yesterday along with a bunch of other arcanas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 Needs to be limited card is not limited Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Supreme Gamesmaster Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 Spirit Reaper plus immunity. If it isn't banned already, it will be any second. In the meantime, let's just enjoy the pure control deck power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 prove this card is damaging to the game and probably i believe you... probably... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 supreme grandmaster got it, spirit reaper and marsh are limited why shouldnt this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 Wow, if you get tails it's cheap as hell. They'll be 3 in every deck, it needs to be banned, NAU! This (Tails) + anything to change it to defense, and you pretty much win unless they have a trample monster, which is rare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilson91 Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 This is Spirit Reaper on acid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 Wow' date=' if you get tails it's cheap as hell. They'll be 3 in every deck, it needs to be banned, NAU![/quote'] Decks that rely on speed don't need a single copy of this.Did Dark Return use Spirit Reaper or Marshmallon? This (Tails) + anything to change it to defense' date=' and you pretty much win unless they have a trample monster, which is rare.[/quote'] Or a non-targeting destruction card, like almost all the destruction played these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 Yeah guess you have a point, but this thing is still broken and needs at least limitedness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 Seeing how Spirit Reaper and Marshmallon are limited, this should also be limited. Also, seeing how most destruction cards that are used don't target, it is not as bad as some may think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 Its a good card and I got all 3 of mine for three, it will probably be limited Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuldur Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 i think it should be limited it's too powerful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 again, prove that this card: * is damaging to the meta * is bad at 3 but good at 1 but all i see is "i think, i guesss, it must, it would" and nothing concrete... arguments or GTFO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bozotehpwns Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 Meh if they are going to limit marshmallon why not limit this too? its just another wall that can get some decent protection i say limit but then again i really dont care about walls thats why i have lightning vortex... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 i dont have mine traded it off. but seeing it in action makes yes its deadly but u will never pull off the 2nd effect right. its not a spirit reaper on crake or a marsh on speed its just a little hard to kill monster. reason this card will probly never get banned: u have to SUMMON it. that means in ATTACK MODE. if u want to get its flip. then u would have to deck earthquack or something to swich it into deffence. that is a waiste of space my friends. the only time i saw this card being deadly is when my friend summoned it into attack mode and creature swapped it to the other person leaving him a gateway.[/thread] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 It's another Spirit Reaper, it's another Marshmallon. They deserve to be Limited, it deserves to be Limited. Simple as that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 Who cares about the second effect? It's no big deal, it can help every once in a while, but isn't really important. It's just a Reaper 3.0, 2.0 being Marshmallon. It almost makes me wonder, why didn't UDE just unlimit Reaper rather than making 3 versions of the same card with slightly different effects? I guess Reaper's second effect is actually worthwhile, but whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 the fact that it can't be destroyed in battle or by effects (from whose effects comes from coin toss) is good,but the fact it can't go to defense is a bummer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 the fact that it can't be destroyed in battle or by effects (from whose effects comes from coin toss) is good' date='but the fact it can't go to defense is a bummer[/quote'] That's not what the coin toss effect does. Read better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 I know,the coin toss decides whose card effects the Fool is immune to,like cards effects that would destroy it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 I know' date='the coin toss decides whose card effects the Fool is immune to,like cards effects that would destroy it.[/quote'] No. Read The Fool better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 okay,so it doesn't negate effects that don't target him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 okay' date='so it doesn't negate effects that don't target him[/quote'] Such as Smashing Ground, Fissure, Lightning Vortex, Darklord Zerato, Torrential Tribute, Judgment Dragoon, and basically all of the other monster removal that is used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.