Shaco Posted July 7, 2007 Report Share Posted July 7, 2007 Hmmmmm, do "you" think this deck is regional material? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaoserver Posted July 7, 2007 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2007 Seeing as I have no side deck, no. A Demise deck or good magical explosion deck would put and end to this very swiftly without siding.Once I put my side deck together(decrees, my body as a shield, prohibition, macro cosmos) then yes I believe it could compete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted July 7, 2007 Report Share Posted July 7, 2007 Every time I make a side deck, it always seems to have 3 Dustshoots a Mind Crush and a confiscation in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaoserver Posted July 7, 2007 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2007 All good cards(it pains me not to have dust and mind in here, but it was an inevitable choice). Only problem with siding those is then your in serious trouble when your up against a darkworld or D.D deck, though the latter is rare at regs now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkguy00000 Posted July 7, 2007 Report Share Posted July 7, 2007 Which is why you start with it sided. If you were playing DW or D.D you'd never side it in. Anyway, Dark World's been nailed by Macro Cosmos... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaoserver Posted July 7, 2007 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2007 Pretty much yeah. "I activate card destruction!" "I chain cosmos" "gg" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaaraofthesand617 Posted July 11, 2007 Report Share Posted July 11, 2007 8/10 you could add Yata-Garasu This card cannot be Special Summoned. This card returns to the owner's hand during the End Phase of the turn that it is Normal Summoned, Flip Summoned or flipped face-up. When this card inflicts Battle Damage to opponent's Life Points, your opponent skips his/her next Draw Phase. with that and no cards in your opponents hand they cant do anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaoserver Posted July 11, 2007 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2007 Yatas banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the Snakey Wolf Lord Posted July 16, 2007 Report Share Posted July 16, 2007 Um... I really have a hard time understanding you`r deck... hm... I geuss I understand everything now. But what if you don`t draw the right cards? do you have a backup plan? i`ll give it a 6 or 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaoserver Posted July 16, 2007 Author Report Share Posted July 16, 2007 Theres no such thing as not drawing the right cards with this deck.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warrior_of_Phoenix Posted July 19, 2007 Report Share Posted July 19, 2007 Much like my toolbox(a 17 card difference)' date=' however this is even more aggressive, and seeks to pin my opponent down by destroying their hand. Tributes:Thestalos x3Raiza x2cyber dragon x3 Non tributes:Dekochi x3sanganexiled force x2Mystic Tomatox2Don Zaloogx2Spirit reaper Magic:Soul exchange x2Brain control x2snatch stealenemy controller shrinkx2book of moonpot of avariceconfiscationheavy stormMSTPremature burial Trap:RODDrop offx2Trap Dust Shootx3Mind Crush Drop off is the universal equivelant of [img']http://www.hellblazer.com/media/pwned.jpg[/img] You wanted aggro, and I think I gave you control. Do you duel with a side deck? Maybe you can use ruthless denials I'm surprised people aren't using this, I can see this card being played when the next ban list goes out Hope I was remotely beneficial Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted July 20, 2007 Report Share Posted July 20, 2007 Don Zaloogx2 My binder still needs one. Are you still getting one in a trade that I may be able to obtain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.