Jump to content

Legendary Flame Lord: Discussion

Sander

Recommended Posts

Sander Newbie

Sander

Posted
  • Author
Posted

no because you opponent has to activate the spell cards and lots of spell cards are destruction. Also Tonis your reasoning is bad gadgets are structure deck cards

 

Read effect better' date='

 

''This card can only be Ritual Summoned with the Ritual Spell Card, "Incandescent Ordeal". You must also Tribute monsters whose total Levels equals 7 or more from the field or your hand. Each time [b']you[/b] or your opponent activates 1 Spell Card, put 1 Spell Counter on this card. Remove 3 Spell Counters from this card to destroy all monsters on the field except this card.''

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MarbleZone Newbie

MarbleZone

Posted
Posted

I personally find it too slow, and I'm not even judging it based on the ridiculous speed of this particular meta. Also, the way I see it, Monarchs kill this guy completely, whether through their effects or simply by suiciding into it - and the opponent will waste a lot less time and resources to bring out a Monarch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
uzumakinaruto93 Newbie

uzumakinaruto93

Posted
Posted

Demise>this

 

And on that note' date=' DAD>this and Demise, what I don't see is how that helps the thread's author in any way.

[/quote']

 

well they have pretty much the same effect, only demise does the job better. he also asked if it was worth basing a deck around and i answered that too so it did kinda help

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MarbleZone Newbie

MarbleZone

Posted
Posted

Demise>this

 

And on that note' date=' DAD>this and Demise, what I don't see is how that helps the thread's author in any way.

[/quote']

 

well they have pretty much the same effect, only demise does the job better. he also asked if it was worth basing a deck around and i answered that too so it did kinda help

 

And DAD does the "job" better than both. I think it's more useful to explain why the card isn't worth running rahter than pointing out cards that are better and that he might not even own. For instance, I don't own Demise, so if I had made this thread, I would have found your post completely useless.

 

Sometimes it won't hurt to go into detail a bit more instead of just keeping it "short and sharp" like some people on this Section enjoy doing so much. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
uzumakinaruto93 Newbie

uzumakinaruto93

Posted
Posted

Demise>this

 

And on that note' date=' DAD>this and Demise, what I don't see is how that helps the thread's author in any way.

[/quote']

 

well they have pretty much the same effect, only demise does the job better. he also asked if it was worth basing a deck around and i answered that too so it did kinda help

 

And DAD does the "job" better than both. I think it's more useful to explain why the card isn't worth running rahter than pointing out cards that are better and that he might not even own. For instance, I don't own Demise, so if I had made this thread, I would have found your post completely useless.

 

Sometimes it won't hurt to go into detail a bit more instead of just keeping it "short and sharp" like some people on this Section enjoy doing so much. ;)

 

you said it yourself, it is way to slow. Nor is it likely that 3 spells will even be played before it destroyed. And even if you get to play 3 spells before your opponent destroys it, at least 1 of those are likely to summon a monster and due to its effect the spell will be waisted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cyber Altair Newbie

Cyber Altair

Posted
Posted

Demise>this

 

And on that note' date=' DAD>this and Demise, what I don't see is how that helps the thread's author in any way.

[/quote']

 

well they have pretty much the same effect, only demise does the job better. he also asked if it was worth basing a deck around and i answered that too so it did kinda help

 

And DAD does the "job" better than both. I think it's more useful to explain why the card isn't worth running rahter than pointing out cards that are better and that he might not even own. For instance, I don't own Demise, so if I had made this thread, I would have found your post completely useless.

 

Sometimes it won't hurt to go into detail a bit more instead of just keeping it "short and sharp" like some people on this Section enjoy doing so much. ;)

 

JD pwns both now that the May banlist came up. you want more details?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MarbleZone Newbie

MarbleZone

Posted
Posted

...What does that have to do with the topic at hand again? I thought we were discussing why Legendary Flame Lord is or isn't worth making a Deck around. Bringing up Demise or Judgement Dragon to the discussion is pointless and doesn't help the person that made this thread. It's really not that hard to undertand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MarbleZone Newbie

MarbleZone

Posted
Posted

No, that's not really my point. It's well known that Demise is the best Ritual out there... But I think it's more important to explain why Legendary Flame Lord isn't good instead of just posting "Demise>this". I just don't think it's a valuable contribution at all, it's more helpful to show why a Deck with this card wouldn't work. There are tons of better Decks out there, but he didn't ask about alternatives nor to discuss DDT, Oppression Gadgets, DADReturn or anything like that. I don't think that's the info he asked for, that's all. This is essentially another card review, and no one is commenting on the card on the grounds that there's a better Ritual.

But yeah, I'm probably talking too much myself. I'm shutting up now. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tekkaman01 Newbie

tekkaman01

Posted
Posted

^what i dont understand is why you dont let people give alternatives to a card that is horrible so a person can better their deck

Giving alternatives to cards is fine' date=' unless the card your trying to replace is the main card in the deck. I understand your trying to help him better his deck, but (s)he stated that a deck might be built around it. If that happens then you should be helping make the best Legendary Flame Lord deck possible. Sure it won't be the greatest deck, but It could be better than some of the other "fun" decks people like to play with when they don't feel like bringing out the DAD/OHM/Gadgets/ect...

No, that's not really my point. It's well known that Demise is the best Ritual out there... But I think it's more important to explain why Legendary Flame Lord isn't good instead of just posting "Demise>this". I just don't think it's a valuable contribution at all, it's more helpful to show why a Deck with this card wouldn't work. There are tons of better Decks out there, but he didn't ask about alternatives nor to discuss DDT, Oppression Gadgets, DADReturn or anything like that. I don't think that's not the info he asked for, that's all. This is essentially another card review, and no one is commenting on the card on the grounds that there's a better Ritual.

But yeah, I'm probably talking too much myself. I'm shutting up now. ;)

You shouldn't shut yourself up, you are trying to make some valid points

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...