Andronikos Posted May 28, 2020 Report Share Posted May 28, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andronikos Posted May 28, 2020 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2020 Wanted to make Goblin Slayer from the anime of the same name, what do you guys think, how would this card do if it was a real card? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pommelo Posted May 28, 2020 Report Share Posted May 28, 2020 Well, this lad definitely hates Beast and Beast-Warrior mobs xD. Anywho, let me try and help you with the card grammar for starters: Quote If your opponent controls a Beast or Beast-Warrior monster or has a monster in the GY with those types, you can Special Summon this card (from your hand). Gains 500 ATK for each Beast or Beast-Warrior monster your opponent controls and/or are in their GY. Cannot be targeted or destroyed by the effects of Beast or Beast-Warrior monsters. If this card battles a Beast or Beast-Warrior monster, card effects cannot be activated until the end of the Damage Step. If this card attacks a Beast or Beast-Warrior Defense Position monster, inflict piercing battle damage. Yeah, little by little, dat Konami is taking out redundant terms and stuff, such as using -type, or saying "on their side of the field" since "your opponent controls" already implies that, etc. Anyway, this card seems mostly like Side Deck material, with one exception. I based my re-write off the base idea of your card, but I wonder if you meant for this card's ATK to be increased by only the Beasts in your opponent's GY (as it is, both GYs count). That alone make this card extremely potent mid-late game due to the humongous ATK increase, were you to run it in your own Beast/Beast Warrior Deck. I believe it makes a bit more sense if only the opponent's field and GY counts, in which case the card becomes 100% dependent on the opponent's Deck and hence why I mentioned the Side Deck earlier. If you keep the ATK increase effect as it is, then I believe you need to decrease the boost quite a bit for the card to become more balanced. Also, will you be making cards with the Archer, Priestess and the other girls? 'Cause I wanna see that ^_^. p.d. You're new to the site, huh? Welcome and enjoy your stay EDIT: updated the card grammar according to your reply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andronikos Posted May 29, 2020 Author Report Share Posted May 29, 2020 5 hours ago, Rayfield Lumina said: Well, this lad definitely hates Beast and Beast-Warrior mobs xD. Anywho, let me try and help you with the card grammar for starters: Yeah, little by little, dat Konami is taking out redundant terms and stuff, such as using -type, or saying "on their side of the field" since "your opponent controls" already implies that, etc. Anyway, this card seems mostly like Side Deck material, with one exception. I based my re-write off the base idea of your card, but I wonder if you meant for this card's ATK to be increased by only the Beasts in your opponent's GY (as it is, both GYs count). That alone make this card extremely potent mid-late game due to the humongous ATK increase, were you to run it in your own Beast/Beast Warrior Deck. I believe it makes a bit more sense if only the opponent's field and GY counts, in which case the card becomes 100% dependent on the opponent's Deck and hence why I mentioned the Side Deck earlier. If you keep the ATK increase effect as it is, then I believe you need to decrease the boost quite a bit for the card to become more balanced. Also, will you be making cards with the Archer, Priestess and the other girls? 'Cause I wanna see that ^_^. p.d. You're new to the site, huh? Welcome and enjoy your stay Thank you! And yes I kinda messed up, it should have been only the opponents field and GY, oopsie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andronikos Posted May 29, 2020 Author Report Share Posted May 29, 2020 And pardon my outdated Konami grammer x) I'm kinda a returning player, leaving the game sometime in 2016 and came back earlier this year, and I'll see what effects I can come up with for those girls in GS's party hahah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pommelo Posted May 29, 2020 Report Share Posted May 29, 2020 10 hours ago, Andronikos said: Thank you! And yes I kinda messed up, it should have been only the opponents field and GY, oopsie It's ok, I'll update the card grammar up there according to this, then. I myself have still quite a bit to learn, and also card grammar is updated once in a while, so it's natural to miss certain stuff. 10 hours ago, Andronikos said: And pardon my outdated Konami grammer x) I'm kinda a returning player, leaving the game sometime in 2016 and came back earlier this year, and I'll see what effects I can come up with for those girls in GS's party hahah You'd better do! xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.