Tinkerer Posted August 20, 2019 Report Share Posted August 20, 2019 (Forced?) ConcatenationNormal TrapYour opponent must Link Summon 1 Link Monster using all monsters they control. If they cannot, look at your opponent's Extra Deck, then you take 3000 damage. You can only activate 1 "Node Catalyst" per turn. Another simplistic removal option for the modern age. I like the name, but I'm not sure if I should just call it "Concatenation" or add the "Forced" part for emphasis. Any opinion one way or another would be appreciated. ...other than that, I think the card's power and usage pretty much speaks for itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokutah Posted August 21, 2019 Report Share Posted August 21, 2019 When this card is activated, Note all face-up monster your opponent control: immediately, after this effect resolved; Your opponent must Link Summon a Link Monster and it must including any monster noted by this card. Otherwise, he/she take 3000 Damage. Repeat this effect until [x]. You can only activate (card name) once per turn [X] can be either:1) "all noted monster is used as Link Material"2) "all monster he/she control is only 1 Link Monster" Kinda hard to word this card but i get the general idea. While your opponent probably end up with humongous Link Monster, its expected they also will not have additional board to back-up for it, still tricky but easing the player to counter attack their board Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinkerer Posted August 21, 2019 Author Report Share Posted August 21, 2019 Thanks, but that's actually changing how I want the card to work. It's supposed to be a calculated risk-reward removal card. You (the player that activated the card) are the one taking the burn damage if you miss-predict what the opponent has (they have 4 monsters when you activate this, but they don't have a Link-4 in the Extra Deck). Further, I'm not aiming for an incremental removal (i.e. "repeat until..."), but an immediate usage of all their monsters; otherwise, it removes the whole prediction aspect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.