Dark Magician Girl Knight (Timeaus Eyes, Clear Effects, Can't Lose)

[Black D'Sceptyr]

So yeah, the picture in the center of this card once had a whole-a$$ owl on the side and her hair was not like that. I say that to say, again, I'm here to stay.

 

Likely. 

 

 

[spoiler=Dark Magician Girl Knight: Info]

DARK/Warrior-Type Effect Monster/Level 6/2000 ATK/1600 DEF

 

Lore: (This card name is also always treated as "Dark Magician Knight".) 

Cannot be Normal Summoned/Set. Must be Special Summoned with a Spell/Trap effect while the only monsters you control are Spellcaster monsters (min. 1). If this card is Special Summoned: You can Set 1 "The Eye of Timeaus" or 1 "Chaos Form" from your hand or Deck. This card's name becomes "Dark Magician Girl" while on the field.

 

 

 

So yeah, Magician Navigation, Knight's Title. Short list, but this actually rewards you for running the former, since it'll be a nice midplay to bring out Dark Magician and this, Set your Timeaus, and bring out a Dragon Knight Fusion to pwn face. 

 

No OPT Summon but its Nomi otherwise so yeah. Simple and clean, and it helps forward what Dark Magicians do best. Ironically enough, what they do best is turtle behind Fusions even though they have in-Archetype Xyzes, sorta the reverse of Blue-Eyes that turtled behind Xyzs/Synchros when they had Fusions. 

 

Lemme know what you think, folks. Reviews, revelry, you know the drill.

 

BD'S, signing off.

 

UPDATE I: Now Summons on ANY Spell/Trap effect, but you better have a Spellcaster on board when you do. Second effect stays; even if its a rule, Dragulas, its an illustrated one, and one Altergeists (among other Decks) would be more broken with if it worked as you implied.

[Dragulas]

You are setting Normal Spells (and ritual but for context are the same), the can be activated the turn they are set is by ruling.

 

Not much to say about this but its pretty restricted on how can be summoned regardless of the obvious navigation. Title will need this to be in the hand. I dont think being able to be summoned by any effect (or at least spell/trap) will break this.

[Black D'Sceptyr]

UPDATED WITH EASIER SUMMONING CONDITIONS, ALSO: 

 

 

 

[Tkk]

I like the card and I agree with @@Dragulas that "That Set card can be activated this turn." probably isn't needed.
 

Also just fyi the card picture doesn't currently match the real effect, which might make people confused when they see it
 

[Black D'Sceptyr]

I like the card and I agree with @@Dragulas that "That Set card can be activated this turn." probably isn't needed.

 

Also just fyi the card picture doesn't currently match the real effect, which might make people confused when they see it

 

 

Alright, its fixed. Guess I caved.

[Tkk]

I like the card and I agree with @@Dragulas that "That Set card can be activated this turn." probably isn't needed.

 

Also just fyi the card picture doesn't currently match the real effect, which might make people confused when they see it

 

 

Haha but when you made the quote text change to match the card, the original quote text was actually the right one!

 

there is no card text that uses the pharse ", when all monsters you control..."

 

but Backup Warrior, At One With the Sword, and Supercharge say " while the only monsters you control..."

in this example, there's no comma separating the summoning procedure from the restriction

[Black D'Sceptyr]

Haha but when you made the quote text change to match the card, the original quote text was actually the right one!

 

there is no card text that uses the pharse ", when all monsters you control..."

 

but Backup Warrior, At One With the Sword, and Supercharge say " while the only monsters you control..."

in this example, there's no comma separating the summoning procedure from the restriction

 

Okay, certain I got it right this time.

[Tkk]

Possible rewording/buff I just now thought about:

How would you feel if instead of the last 2 effects, it had 1 name condition and 1 continuous effect on the field? That way you could summon it from the Deck with Knight's Title

ex.

 

(This card's name is always treated as "Dark Magician Knight")

Cannot be Normal Summoned/Set. Must be Special Summoned with a Spell/Trap effect while the only monsters you control are Spellcaster monsters (min. 1). This card's name becomes "Dark Magician Girl" while on the field. If this card is Special Summoned: You can Set 1 "The Eye of Timeaus" or 1 "Chaos Form" from your hand or Deck.

[Black D'Sceptyr]

Possible rewording/buff I just now thought about:

 

How would you feel if instead of the last 2 effects, it had 1 name condition and 1 continuous effect on the field? That way you could summon it from the Deck with Knight's Title

 

ex.

 

Then it might end up conflicting, since both effects are overlapping on the field. Normally I wouldn't care, but Eye of Timeaus tho.

[Tkk]

I don't think it would. It becomes Dark Magician Girl on the field, so it's still a valid target for The Eye of Timaeus.

[BatMed]

I don't think it would. It becomes Dark Magician Girl on the field, so it's still a valid target for The Eye of Timaeus.

It would. [(This card's name is always treated as "Dark Magician Knight")] overwrites "This card's name becomes "Dark Magician Girl" while on the field"

 

EDIT: However you can try the following wordings:

• This card's name becomes "Dark Magician Girl" while on the field. This card's name becomes "Dark Magician Knight" while in your hand, Deck, or GY.

OR

• This card's name becomes "Dark Magician Girl" while on the field. If you would Special Summon "Dark Magician Knight" with a card effect: You can negate that Special Summon, and if you do, Special Summon this card from that same location.

[Tkk]

The Eye of Timaeus says "(This card is also always treated as "Legendary Dragon Timaeus".)"

 

You could just use that phrasing and say

"(This card is also always treated as "Dark Magician Knight".)"

[Black D'Sceptyr]

 

It would. [(This card's name is always treated as "Dark Magician Knight")] overwrites "This card's name becomes "Dark Magician Girl" while on the field"

 

EDIT: However you can try the following wordings:

• This card's name becomes "Dark Magician Girl" while on the field. This card's name becomes "Dark Magician Knight" while in your hand, Deck, or GY.

OR

• This card's name becomes "Dark Magician Girl" while on the field. If you would Special Summon "Dark Magician Knight" with a card effect: You can negate that Special Summon, and if you do, Special Summon this card from that same location.

 

 

The Eye of Timaeus says "(This card is also always treated as "Legendary Dragon Timaeus".)"

 

You could just use that phrasing and say

 

"(This card is also always treated as "Dark Magician Knight".)"

 

And I have made the final changes to the card with your help. Thank you both.