~British Soul~ Posted December 13, 2018 Report Share Posted December 13, 2018 https://ygorganization.com/jf19-new-charmer-support-card/ Possessed AwakeningSpell/ContinuousYou can only use the (3) effect of this card’s name once per turn.(1) Monsters you control gain 300 ATK for each different Attribute of monster you control.(2) “Charmer” and “Possessed” monsters you control cannot be destroyed by card effects.(3) If a Spellcaster monster with 1850 Original ATK is Normal or Special Summoned to your field: Draw 1 card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingdom Xathers Posted December 13, 2018 Report Share Posted December 13, 2018 The fact that the first effect is generic is quite hilarious, not to mention potent even if you run this in a non-"Charmer"/"Possessed" Deck that runs 2 or more Attributes, like in "Fur Hire", for instance". Second effect is... okay. Protection from Effect Destruction is nice and all, but it'd probably be better for the Charmers/Possessed if it added Battle Destruction, too. Or protection from other removal effects. And lastly, the last effect is nice if you happen to run the Fairy Tails in addition to/instead of the Possessed Charmers (Snow, especially). Oh, and it triggers off of Summoning Hiita's Link Monster form, too. That being said, the first effect alone might make this a big enough target to get popped, not to mention the 3rd effect can get this Ghost Ogre'd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Highlander Posted December 13, 2018 Report Share Posted December 13, 2018 The fact that the first effect is generic is quite hilarious, not to mention potent even if you run this in a non-"Charmer"/"Possessed" Deck that runs 2 or more Attributes, like in "Fur Hire", for instance". Second effect is... okay. Protection from Effect Destruction is nice and all, but it'd probably be better for the Charmers/Possessed if it added Battle Destruction, too. Or protection from other removal effects. And lastly, the last effect is nice if you happen to run the Fairy Tails in addition to/instead of the Possessed Charmers (Snow, especially). Oh, and it triggers off of Summoning Hiita's Link Monster form, too. That being said, the first effect alone might make this a big enough target to get popped, not to mention the 3rd effect can get this Ghost Ogre'd.There is a continuous Trap that makes them float, they want to be destroyed to float and then trigger the 3rd effect to draw 1 card after replacing themselves, it protecting their continuous Spell/Trap cards, as well adding targeting protection would be needed.The card sounds too low impact to make them matter, though at the very least it is a start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted December 13, 2018 Report Share Posted December 13, 2018 That last effect should've been soft opt, honestly. The other two effects are fairly ineffectual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CraneMonk Posted December 13, 2018 Report Share Posted December 13, 2018 With this and Link Hiita, will they make Link versions of all the charmers? Or even main deck retains that can be made into a viable deck? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vla1ne Posted December 15, 2018 Report Share Posted December 15, 2018 suspiciously specific ATK value makes sense, but still, with the STK restriction i have to agree on the soft OPT, the ATK gain is going to be a good threat with 2 or 3 of these on board. 600-1200 per attribute is nothing to laugh at. the destruction protection is nice, and didn't have to be there with the other two effects, so i can appreciate it. Is there any chance of element sabers being able to use this to any effect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinkerer Posted December 15, 2018 Report Share Posted December 15, 2018 suspiciously specific ATK value makes sense, but still, with the STK restriction i have to agree on the soft OPT, the ATK gain is going to be a good threat with 2 or 3 of these on board. 600-1200 per attribute is nothing to laugh at. the destruction protection is nice, and didn't have to be there with the other two effects, so i can appreciate it. Is there any chance of element sabers being able to use this to any effect?My thoughts as well on elementsabers, but they seem really slow to field monsters on their own unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vla1ne Posted December 15, 2018 Report Share Posted December 15, 2018 This card has a lot going for it, even with the shortcoming of the 3rd effect, it's a solid card that pays for itself easily. The fairy tail monsters, unpossessed, the new charmer link(s?) ect. They've gotten slow and steady support over the years, with the help of the fairy tail monsters, they're starting to look like an actual threat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconus297 Posted December 15, 2018 Report Share Posted December 15, 2018 suspiciously specific ATK value makes sense, but still, with the STK restriction i have to agree on the soft OPT, the ATK gain is going to be a good threat with 2 or 3 of these on board. 600-1200 per attribute is nothing to laugh at. the destruction protection is nice, and didn't have to be there with the other two effects, so i can appreciate it. Is there any chance of element sabers being able to use this to any effect?That specific ATK value comes from the Familiar-Possessed versions of the girls (plus Dharc), plus the first Link they have shown off in Hiita. Also, Hiita is sporting torn stockings like in her Link artwork, so this is a preview of the changes made to the elemental girls before their actual Links come out. No such preview yet exists for Dharc or Lyna . . . but given that they look somewhere between the teenage Familiar-Possessed and fully-adult Calamity Charmer versions of themselves, everybody is probably somewhere around 20 now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.