Draconus297 Posted November 16, 2018 Author Report Share Posted November 16, 2018 Pepperoni and pineapple. Don't knock the combo till you've tried it. Best sweet and savory that you can get delivered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconus297 Posted December 5, 2018 Author Report Share Posted December 5, 2018 Bump a bump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconus297 Posted December 15, 2018 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2018 Bump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconus297 Posted December 21, 2018 Author Report Share Posted December 21, 2018 Bump bump, ba-bump ba-bump ba-bump.Bump bump, ba-bump, ba-bumpity bump! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted December 21, 2018 Report Share Posted December 21, 2018 Why do I get the feeling your AGM Deck Challenge supports bad decks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconus297 Posted December 21, 2018 Author Report Share Posted December 21, 2018 Honestly, there were two different challenges for November and December, but I lost my list so I didn't remember which was which. As for the Deck Challenges themselves, burn is almost always un-fun to play against, but given that there are so many AGM cards with weak, nigh-pointless burn effects, I figured that Deck construction with burn as a theme could be done without everyone submitting some kind of FTK Deck designed with the AGM banlist in mind (which is probably difficult anyway, given how the approval process works). As for single-card support, that was literally only done so that people would potentially make not only Blue-Eyes and Dark Magician Decks, which function entirely around the concept of "this support is for one card and one card only", but also AGM Decks like BlasterCube and Dragonna-bugeisha, which need one specific, named monster in them just to function. For this challenge, I've also waived the usual "you forgot something really important" clause, to make the challenge more centered around fun design than pure competitive power, or literally every submission for it would be B-E or D-B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.