Ryusei the Morning Star Posted July 13, 2018 Report Share Posted July 13, 2018 Deviritual BookstonLevel 5 DARK Spellcaster Effect Monster-You can only use one of this card name's (1) and (2) effects per turn, and only once that turn.(1) You can reveal 1 Ritual Spell in your hand; Special Summon both this card from your hand and 1 "Deviritual" monster from your Deck, except "Deviritual Bookston".(2) If this card is Special Summoned from the Deck: You can target 1 Ritual Spell in your GY; add it to your hand.(3) You cannot Special Summon monsters from the Extra Deck. Deviritual PensilbelLevel 3 LIGHT Psychic Effect Monster-You can only use one of this card name's (1) and (2) effects per turn, and only once that turn.(1) You can reveal 1 Ritual Monster in your hand; Special Summon both this card from your hand and 1 "Deviritual" monster from your Deck, except "Deviritual Pensilbel".(2) If this card is Special Summoned from the Deck: You can target 1 Ritual Monster in your GY; add it to your hand.(3) You cannot Special Summon monsters from the Extra Deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dova Posted July 13, 2018 Report Share Posted July 13, 2018 well i guess thats one way of expanding it I was looking for a way of recycling my Ritual Spells in Shinobirds, but my Demise, Gishki and BLS don't really need it. More versatility in Nekroz, mayhaps, although they're very stringent when it comes to levelling. At least you have the illusion of choice now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ENMaker Posted July 13, 2018 Report Share Posted July 13, 2018 I was just thinking we could really do with worse versions of both existing Deviritual monsters that offer no practical advantage and whose situational superiority is so limited that the absence of any bonus incentive to use them is baffling. I must be blessed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black D'Sceptyr Posted July 13, 2018 Report Share Posted July 13, 2018 I was just thinking we could really do with worse versions of both existing Deviritual monsters that offer no practical advantage and whose situational superiority is so limited that the absence of any bonus incentive to use them is baffling. I must be blessed. Free +2ing on the field For Your Rituals & GY Retrieval Is Bad Now, you heard it here first Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ENMaker Posted July 13, 2018 Report Share Posted July 13, 2018 Free +2ing on the field For Your Rituals & GY Retrieval Is Bad Now, you heard it here first It's indisputably worse than searching. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black D'Sceptyr Posted July 13, 2018 Report Share Posted July 13, 2018 It's indisputably worse than searching. "Worse than Searching" does not a bad card make, I thought we learned this from Invocation, and considering any of the Devirituals can Summon themselves from the hand and any other from the Deck, it's irrelevant. This offers Rituals a good follow-up play. Besides, Devirituals offer cheap Level fixing-just run 4 of the Deck searchers and 1 each of the GY searches and you've got proper material for any Ritual Levels 7-11. That's....actually really good and necessary for Rituals nowadays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ENMaker Posted July 13, 2018 Report Share Posted July 13, 2018 "Worse than Searching" does not a bad card make, I thought we learned this from Invocation, and considering any of the Devirituals can Summon themselves from the hand and any other from the Deck, it's irrelevant. This offers Rituals a good follow-up play. Besides, Devirituals offer cheap Level fixing-just run 4 of the Deck searchers and 1 each of the GY searches and you've got proper material for any Ritual Levels 7-11. That's....actually really good and necessary for Rituals nowadays. I didn't say they were bad, but they are worse, and you'd want to see the searchers in the majority of situations more than you'd want to see these. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted July 13, 2018 Report Share Posted July 13, 2018 They're not great. A +1 to material isn't good, in-and-of itself, because most Ritual Decks either have a way to circumvent the cost... or they suck. This supports bad ritual decks in a way they want, but it's not exactly outstanding when it doesn't lead into better. Now, the OG Devirituals are kinda nutso. These aren't terrible. But the issue comes in when you realize how little the cards actually do in, say, Nekroz or Gishki, which are the standards to be held to. If even the better duo isn't OMG BROKEN, these aren't even close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plasma Prince Posted July 13, 2018 Report Share Posted July 13, 2018 Was honestly wishing for a set of Devirituals that act as entire Tributes or something. The first two were great, but I find these a bit lackluster. Not terrible though. Side Note: Still waiting on that Nephthys Ritual archetype atm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuriena Posted July 13, 2018 Report Share Posted July 13, 2018 I like Pensilbel. It lets me add back Brio (which I can discard easily!), and it lets me add Ritual Monsters even with Talismandra. I do like its Level too. Plus those faces. Maybe I'll try an Impcantation build again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Highlander Posted July 13, 2018 Report Share Posted July 13, 2018 If you still have the prior one's in your deck these would always lead into them and do kind of the same these would do in your hand.If you are out of the original one's you can pull from the deck these are immediately prepared.How is this bad ? You never get the effects of the one from your hand anyways.Now the original one's are more consistent and you sometimes get a free additional option.I personally like them and do not see how the critique applies if the originals are considered good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.