Jump to content

Infinite ATK! (2 - card OTK!)


Recommended Posts

Here it is...

2x Destiny Hero - Dreadmaster

 

Do you follow? If not:

Dreadmaster says "this cards ATK is equal to the combined ATK of all destiny hero monsters you control (except this card)"

By adding a second one, you create an infinite ATK possibility!

(you'll need a D-Hero on the field, but if you summon dreadmaster properly, you should have no problem getting this)

2x Foolish Burial anyone?

 

Check the deck here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Except this Card" probally means having 2 out doesn't count towards adding to each others ATK or DEF.

 

No' date=' the "except this card" part isn't the problem. The problem is that Dreadmaster measures [b']original[/b] ATK, but only increases his ATK and DEF - his original stats are 0.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. By "Except this card" it means itself.

If it doesn't work however, 2x The Wicked Avatar + Heroes Mask does.

Oh, BTW crab, I was thinking about that, maybe it's just one neverending loop. (still good though since the only way out of the loop is via opp surrendering.)

Oh, you beated me :lol:

Now I see. Would 2x The Wicked Avatar and 1x Hero's Mask work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. By "Except this card" it means itself.

 

Correct.

 

If it doesn't work however' date=' 2x The Wicked Avatar + Heroes Mask does.

[/quote']

 

We don't have any rulings on Hero Mask yet; it's possible that it only adds an additional name, but doesn't remove the old name. If it did work, then it would be illegal anyhow.

 

Oh' date=' BTW crab, I was thinking about that, maybe it's just one neverending loop.

[/quote']

 

No. Dreadmaster doesn't work.

 

(still good though since the only way out of the loop is via opp surrendering.)

 

...or by the opponent getting you disqualified for making an illegal move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The edited version doesn't work either; I already explained why. Try reading my posts next time.

 

And if it did work, it would still be illegal, for the reason given by JoC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...