jhcman21 Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 I like this card ALOT, its kinda like a raiza except a little worse, i think it should be at least semi-limited, anyway discussion I am srry but for some reason my computer would not upload the picture so there is no picture Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 its kinda like a raiza except a little worse No. i think it should be at least semi-limited No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhcman21 Posted April 25, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 well, it bounces monsters to the top of the deck wasting an opponents draw, its not as good as raiza, but it does have a similar effect, just not as good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 By that logic, Jar of Greed should be semi-limited, since it has a similar effect to Pot of Greed, just not as good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhcman21 Posted April 25, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 well lets just forget about the whole semi limited thing, ya i was wrong on that, the reason i posted this card was to talk about his effect, i am just sayin that his effect is good, but kinda similar to raiza Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 By that logic, Tribute to the Doomed is kinda similar to Dark Armed Dragon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhcman21 Posted April 25, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 You know what, lets just forget how its effect is similair to raizas, lets just talk about the effect itself, it bounces a monster to the top of the owners deck, if it is attacked while in defence mode, i think this effect works very well at times Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 Ok, go here take the pic's url and post it like this . The card is bad because spinning some monsters might bit you in the @$$. If it does anything it will force your opponent to waste a monster destruction card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 Decent last format. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 Decent last format. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 well spinning is still a good effectunless its dadunless its dad they have used its effect and cvleared your back for then they attack this facedown and didnthave anything in their handto send darks to the grave then yhea this would work well lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 spinning is good, sometimes it's useless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 It is also bad because you cannot choose what to spin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 decent in monarch's format... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.