Jump to content

[MTG] Pot of Greed


~~~~

Recommended Posts

Why? Wouldn't want any Silas Renn interactions would we? lel

 

Mostly I was just thinking Sorcery=Normal Spell. The only reason I made this card and the Black Lotus comparison was that last night I was reading discussion for the card on the gatherer and saw this.

 

 

I'll be honest: 
If you rated it lower than 5, you are just trolling. 
Seriously, this is amazing tempo advantage, and there is zero drawback.

Posted By: infernox10 (04/03/2011 21:24:29)
 
 
 

 

And well me being me this point about "zero drawback" really pissed me off since, yes the card is amazing and powerful and defo a staple in all but a very small amount of decks, it's still a minus 1 in card advantage. The minus 1 is worth it, sure, but it's still a downside. There's also the fact that it's not a very good mid-late game topdeck, although I recognise that the formats where its legal tend not to have mid or late games afaik.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I feel like this card should be (1), but have "you may untap one of your lands" in addition to drawing cards instead of being (0). It also adds some silliness to it which is a plus, no?

But in that case you'd need to have at least 1 land, and that requires some setup. this card does not. What if your opponent has:

 

Mystical space typhoon (0)

sorcery

Select one card, that is not a creature card; send it to the graveyard. You can activate this card during either player's turn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

But in that case you'd need to have at least 1 land, and that requires some setup. this card does not. What if your opponent has:

 

Mystical space typhoon (0)

sorcery

Select one card, that is not a creature card; send it to the graveyard. You can activate this card during either player's turn.

Touché.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...