Jump to content

Arcana Extra Joker


Recommended Posts

ExtraJoker.png?resize=206%2C300&ssl=1

PP20-JP001 アルカナエクストラジョーカー Arcana Extra Joker
Link 3 LIGHT Warrior Link Effect Monster
2800 ATK
Link Arrows: Top-Center, Bottom-Left, Bottom-Right
Link Materials: 3 Warrior monsters with different names
(1) Once per turn, when a Spell Card, Trap Card, or monster effect is activated that targets this card and/or a monster(s) this card points to: You can discard 1 card of the same type (Monster, Spell, or Trap); negate that activation.
(2) When this Link Summoned card is destroyed by battle and sent to the Graveyard: You can choose 2 Level 4 Warrior Normal Monsters from your Deck, and if you do, Special Summon 1 of them, and if you do that, add the other to your hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, requiring a specific card for a specific targeting for a 3-mat monster that can't be laddered, and mainly supports a slow Deck. Heck, the last effect is even by battle only, so that sucks when you CAN'T use the effect. Mistakes were made in this design decision for sure, I suppose that 2800 is good ATK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh damn, I first overlooked the negation effect as a Knight Joker/Merkabah effect, but then I read the comments, looked it again and noticed the rest of the effect. The card is not as good as I initially thought xD

It would have been funnier if it floated into the Fusion Knight, but nope, although Special Summoning 1 Warrior and grabbing another is quite cool and a relatively unique effect. Still, floating upon battle destruction is underwhelming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> "choose 2 Level 4 Warrior Normal Monsters"

> King's Knight is an Effect Monster

Well the wikia says different:

"When this Link Summoned card is destroyed by battle and sent to the GY: You can Special Summon 1 Level 4 Warrior Normal Monster from your Deck, and if you do, add 1 Level 4 Warrior monster from your Deck to your hand."

Idk which is the correct one, but the wikia one makes more sense in case of Queen + King combo.

 

Anyway about the card:

> Battle-float in this day and age? Owait more "and sent to the GY", rip.

> Negate (activation) only and not banish/at least destroy? C'mon koomy, it doesnt even kill anything by itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the wikia says different:

"When this Link Summoned card is destroyed by battle and sent to the GY: You can Special Summon 1 Level 4 Warrior Normal Monster from your Deck, and if you do, add 1 Level 4 Warrior monster from your Deck to your hand."

Idk which is the correct one, but the wikia one makes more sense in case of Queen + King combo.

 

Well, that had better be the correct effect, then, 'cuz I'd be very disappointed otherwise.

 

'Course, this would also mean that Noble Knights could potentially use this, but then there's a number of reasons why they shouldn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the wikia says different:

"When this Link Summoned card is destroyed by battle and sent to the GY: You can Special Summon 1 Level 4 Warrior Normal Monster from your Deck, and if you do, add 1 Level 4 Warrior monster from your Deck to your hand."

Idk which is the correct one, but the wikia one makes more sense in case of Queen + King combo.

 

Anyway about the card:

> Battle-float in this day and age? Owait more "and sent to the GY", rip.

> Negate (activation) only and not banish/at least destroy? C'mon koomy, it doesnt even kill anything by itself.

Well, that had better be the correct effect, then, 'cuz I'd be very disappointed otherwise.

 

'Course, this would also mean that Noble Knights could potentially use this, but then there's a number of reasons why they shouldn't.

I would hope so. At first glance, I was excited for this card. They're making a Link monster for Arcana Knight Joker's monsters? Then I read the effect.

 

I really want that to be it. It would make more sense, and reward you for using three different materials, whereas the 2 Level 4 Normals don't make this card all that worthwhile in the longrun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...