Round 3

[Ryusei the Morning Star]

https://twitter.com/whpresscorps/status/819673314490716160

 

Hillary Clinton Email Criminal Investigation to Reopen

 

http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/2017/01/12/hillary-clinton-email-criminal-investigation-to-reopen.html

 

ROUND 3

[epicmemesbro]

From what I can gather, this ordeal has more to do with either or not the FBI's investigation violated policy by being detrimental to Hillary Clinton's campaign due to it being done during the election rather than the contents of her emails again.

[Halubaris Maphotika]

From what I can gather, this ordeal has more to do with either or not the FBI's investigation violated policy by being detrimental to Hillary Clinton's campaign due to it being done during the election rather than the contents of her emails again.

She'll never be arrested for her crimes. She can sleep tight knowing Benghazi has hundreds of dead, innocent, people and all she has to do is b*tch and moan about Trump.

[Resident Fascist]

She'll never be arrested for her crimes. She can sleep tight knowing Benghazi has hundreds of dead, innocent, people and all she has to do is b*tch and moan about Trump.

 

I'm not overly privy the situation about Benghazi, all I remember it was something to do with the American Embassy, if I'm correct. Also, of course she won't get arrested. America is a banker's state, land of the free, where the law doesn't apply to the rich, the rich get richer, and vulture capitalism leads to atrocious foreign policy that props up a broken power balance.

[Halubaris Maphotika]

I'm not overly privy the situation about Benghazi, all I remember it was something to do with the American Embassy, if I'm correct. Also, of course she won't get arrested. America is a banker's state, land of the free, where the law doesn't apply to the rich, the rich get richer, and vulture capitalism leads to atrocious foreign policy that props up a broken power balance.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-benghazi-hillary-clinton-obama-rhodes-edit-0629-jm-20160628-story.html

 

Here.

[Resident Fascist]

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-benghazi-hillary-clinton-obama-rhodes-edit-0629-jm-20160628-story.html

 

Here.

 

I'm not entirely sure where the hundreds of victims are coming from, unless I'm misreading the situation and the attack on the US compound was followed by US airstrikes, which tends to be America's answer to everything, unfortunately.

[Halubaris Maphotika]

US airstrikes, which tends to be America's answer to everything, unfortunately.

Ain't it a b*tch.

[Resident Fascist]

Ain't it a b*tch.

 

Honestly, I feel a lot of America's problems would solve itself if it stopped reaching into everyone else's business

[Halubaris Maphotika]

Honestly, I feel a lot of America's problems would solve itself if it stopped reaching into everyone else's business

Couldn't

 

Freaking

 

Agree

 

More

[Ryusei the Morning Star]

[Aerion Brightflame]

And what does this letter show?

 

Because if it's meant to be a bombshell I don't see it.

[Ryusei the Morning Star]

And what does this letter show?

 

Because if it's meant to be a bombshell I don't see it.

They're re-opening the case, and now have a favorable DoJ

[Aerion Brightflame]

They're re-opening the case, and now have a favorable DoJ

 

They reopened the case 17 days ago apparently, so that's not the bombshell.

 

And a favourable DoJ might mean a conviction happens, but if enough evidence isn't there, it still won't happen. But it's again something one could guess without that email.

 

So what does that email actually show that's different this time than the last two times she was investigated and the DoJ declined to prosecute? What has that email done to alter the situation we are aware of currently?

[Ryusei the Morning Star]

They reopened the case 17 days ago apparently, so that's not the bombshell.

 

And a favourable DoJ might mean a conviction happens, but if enough evidence isn't there, it still won't happen. But it's again something one could guess without that email.

 

So what does that email actually show that's different this time than the last two times she was investigated and the DoJ declined to prosecute? What has that email done to alter the situation we are aware of currently?

Rep Tulsi Gabbard (D) say she has proof the Obama admin as funneling arms to ISIS

 

*moderate muslim groups that later became ISIS affiliates 

 

I don't want a conviction, I'd actually prefer President Trump pardon her if she is convicted. But she should stand trial if there is something to prosecute. 

[Aerion Brightflame]

Rep Tulsi Gabbard (D) say she has proof the Obama admin as funneling arms to ISIS

 

*moderate muslim groups that later became ISIS affiliates 

 

I don't want a conviction, I'd actually prefer President Trump pardon her if she is convicted. But she should stand trial if there is something to prosecute. 

 

And what relevance does that have to the image? It's a seperate point that's probably fairly valid although I think it's seperate to the actual investigation because the investigation if I remember rightly was pertinant to Hillary's mispractices with the emails rather than the admin funding

 

But I'm still waiting to see what bombshell that image was meant to drop that was apparently so obvious it didn't need any form of explanation to it? Because either it has something, and I'm an idiot for not seeing it, or it's of fairly obstuse importance, in which case you should have explained it in the first place because we don't know all the same things you do.

 

Sorry to be a dick about this point, but this is the second time today I've seen you post something without suitable clarity that's lead to misinterperation, when all you needed to do was spent about 2 minutes putting a couple of sentances explaining what you were saying or trying to demostrate more accurately.

[Ryusei the Morning Star]

And what relevance does that have to the image? It's a seperate point that's probably fairly valid although I think it's seperate to the actual investigation because the investigation if I remember rightly was pertinant to Hillary's mispractices with the emails rather than the admin funding

 

But I'm still waiting to see what bombshell that image was meant to drop that was apparently so obvious it didn't need any form of explanation to it? Because either it has something, and I'm an idiot for not seeing it, or it's of fairly obstuse importance, in which case you should have explained it in the first place because we don't know all the same things you do.

 

Sorry to be a dick about this point, but this is the second time today I've seen you post something without suitable clarity that's lead to misinterperation, when all you needed to do was spent about 2 minutes putting a couple of sentances explaining what you were saying or trying to demostrate more accurately.

2nd time today?

 

I didn't say it was a bombshell. That's bad terminology to use in terms of a prosection case. I'm saying they've officially re-opened the case and are calling for documents now. This means that it's not faint hearted. In conjunction with the Gabbard revelation, pulling HRC's classified emails (not released to the public) from the FBI is significant. In addition Wikileaks has stated that they have more information coming up in 2017. It's not a "bombshell" but it is a movement foward that should still be noted

[Aerion Brightflame]

The Metallic Hydrogen thread, where you chose not to use the word hydrogen, instead quoting a post about a completely different compound and thus leading me to make a completely seperate point to the one you desired.

 

 

I didn't say it was a bombshell. That's bad terminology to use in terms of a prosection case. I'm saying they've officially re-opened the case and are calling for documents now. This means that it's not faint hearted. In conjunction with the Gabbard revelation, pulling HRC's classified emails (not released to the public) from the FBI is significant. In addition Wikileaks has stated that they have more information coming up in 2017. It's not a "bombshell" but it is a movement foward that should still be noted

 

Marvelous; Now next time write that sheet with the image rather than make someone delve for it. Clarity is a wonderful thing.

 

Once again if she's convicted that's a wonderful thing because there's very little doubt that she did a lot of dubious sheet, I just doubt prosecution will happen. Even if it's a republican government, the Clinton's still probably know a lot of sheet about a lot of people which makes it less than favourable to push the issue, and I don't think any new information will rectify the fact that the DoJ will not want to just take a chance with this case, they need a certain conviction.