Ryusei the Morning Star Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 I don't know what people expected. When you negate monsters, they generally die.You also cannot negate a cost You also cannot destroy something that is banished or in the grave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Jesse Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 Wasn't Quasar supposed to be an upgrade to this in-series? lol It looks so much better too. Quasar looks like a giant glowing bug. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted December 18, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 Wasn't Quasar supposed to be an upgrade to this in-series? lol It looks so much better too. Quasar looks like a giant glowing bug.Nah, Quasar is the AU version. And this WOULD get wrecked by Time Lords Quasar is better for winning the game tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Jesse Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 Nah, Quasar is the AU version. And this WOULD get wrecked by Time Lords Quasar is better for winning the game thoI know it's AU, but I'm pretty sure Quasar also used a 'stronger' method of Synchro Summoning than this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~~ Posted December 18, 2016 Report Share Posted December 18, 2016 I know it's AU, but I'm pretty sure Quasar also used a 'stronger' method of Synchro Summoning than this one.Quaser should be stronger than this. That's why Quaser gets 3 attacks and this doesn't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted December 19, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 19, 2016 I know it's AU, but I'm pretty sure Quasar also used a 'stronger' method of Synchro Summoning than this one.Oh, yeah, some BS semantics that turns you gold Forgot that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted December 19, 2016 Report Share Posted December 19, 2016 This is delta accel synchro, like halberd cannon. Quasar was limit over accel synchro, which is why it used like a funking million materials against Z-One Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted December 19, 2016 Report Share Posted December 19, 2016 Oh, yeah, some BS semantics that turns you gold Forgot thatBlazar was Sync Tuner+2 Sync Non-Tuner Quasar was summoned Sync Tuner+4 Sync Non-Tuner but in reality (like our world), Blazars are "stronger" than Quasars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abuthilac Posted December 19, 2016 Report Share Posted December 19, 2016 I've been test the new cosmic blazar, so when I chain his effect to solemn strike, its effect negated, but since solemn strike cannot destroy it (because it have been banished). But during the end phase, cosmic return to the field. It is correct? Or i miss something.Because the written effect was ( during the end phase, if this card was activated and was not negated, return it to the field) Note: playing on ygopro pc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SANDAA BORUTO Posted December 19, 2016 Report Share Posted December 19, 2016 All we had of this card in 5Ds was a name. Konami prints it anyway. Level 12, 4000/4000. Can't say I was expecting anything else in terms of stats. If you can summon Quasar, you can summon this. It's arguably as strong as Quasar. Quasar can negate effects once per turn and attack twice, being your typical OTK machine. Blazar is more of a control card, trading the second attack for the ability to negate literally ANYTHING once per turn (attacks, effects, summons). I really like this thing. Great job, Konami. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Highlander Posted December 19, 2016 Report Share Posted December 19, 2016 All we had of this card in 5Ds was a name. Konami prints it anyway. Level 12, 4000/4000. Can't say I was expecting anything else in terms of stats. If you can summon Quasar, you can summon this. It's arguably as strong as Quasar. Quasar can negate effects once per turn and attack twice, being your typical OTK machine. Blazar is more of a control card, trading the second attack for the ability to negate literally ANYTHING once per turn (attacks, effects, summons). I really like this thing. Great job, Konami.Add that this card (unlike quasar) does not stay as a 4k body without protection, which is both useful and terrible.Which basicly means this card is less offensive and protecting the player less, however is not a sitting duck after using its effect ... oh yea and does not float ... if quasar's floating effect ever mattered outside the anime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted February 13, 2017 Report Share Posted February 13, 2017 Q: When I activate one of the effects of Cosmic Blazar Dragon by banishing it from the field, my opponent chains Solemn Strike to negate the activation. In this case, what happens to that banished Cosmic Blazar Dragon?A: Banishing Cosmic Blazar Dragon until the End Phase is the cost to activate its effects. In this scenario, even if the activation of the effect is negated by Solemn Strike, Cosmic Blazar Dragon returns to the field during the End Phase.Source: http://www.db.yugioh-card.com/yugiohdb/faq_search.action?ope=5&fid=20639&keyword=&tag=-1@Galaxy Destroyer Senator Quasar Enguin, new stuff for your spammy Quasar.dek My biggest question:> Say if i negate opp Summon or S/T using Blazar, then banish itself as a cost, then opp chain Solemn Strike, is Blazar coming back during ep? NOTE: Why i ask this because Strike negates an effect instead of a cost, differ from the Psy-Framelord Omega banish which is part of the effect rather than a cost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~~ Posted February 13, 2017 Report Share Posted February 13, 2017 Q: When I activate one of the effects of Cosmic Blazar Dragon by banishing it from the field, my opponent chains Solemn Strike to negate the activation. In this case, what happens to that banished Cosmic Blazar Dragon?A: Banishing Cosmic Blazar Dragon until the End Phase is the cost to activate its effects. In this scenario, even if the activation of the effect is negated by Solemn Strike, Cosmic Blazar Dragon returns to the field during the End Phase.Source: http://www.db.yugioh-card.com/yugiohdb/faq_search.action?ope=5&fid=20639&keyword=&tag=-1 the source doesn't lead anywhere Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted February 13, 2017 Report Share Posted February 13, 2017 the source doesn't lead anywherehttps://ygorganization.com/thesecouldhavebeennumber5/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted February 13, 2017 Report Share Posted February 13, 2017 That sounds about right, ruling wise. Its cost is to banish until the End Phase. If banishing was part of the effect, like it is with SSD, then negating the activation would stop it from returning. It's a very unusual cost, but that seems like it was the point, based on the other ruling questions asked/answered. It was DESIGNED to do this. That's what distinguishes it from Quasar and such. Quasar may be a win condition, but Blazar does something fairly unique, and that's why it's worth considering as an option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted February 13, 2017 Report Share Posted February 13, 2017 That's kind of silly, but at least it gives Blazar somethingHalberd Cannon was basically useless as soon as Quasar was printed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted February 13, 2017 Report Share Posted February 13, 2017 That sounds about right, ruling wise. Its cost is to banish until the End Phase. If banishing was part of the effect, like it is with SSD, then negating the activation would stop it from returning. It's a very unusual cost, but that seems like it was the point, based on the other ruling questions asked/answered. It was DESIGNED to do this. That's what distinguishes it from Quasar and such. Quasar may be a win condition, but Blazar does something fairly unique, and that's why it's worth considering as an option.Stardust should be able to dodge strike too by this logic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted February 13, 2017 Report Share Posted February 13, 2017 Stardust should be able to dodge strike too by this logic Different phrasing. Stardust has a separate Trigger during the End Phase to SS it if you used the effect that turn. This has coming back as part of the cost. "Banish until the End Phase" is the cost. Shooting Star does the same thing. You banish as part of the effect (not cost). Then it has a separate Trigger to come back during the End Phase if the effect was used that turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted February 13, 2017 Report Share Posted February 13, 2017 Stardust should be able to dodge strike too by this logic Stardust specifies that it must not be negated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted February 13, 2017 Report Share Posted February 13, 2017 Stardust specifies that it must not be negated.They errata'd to make it that way. Evil is right on the return vs SS deal though. Blazar returns in the cost, the original stardust did no. 1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner monstersYou can Tribute this card to negate the activation of a Spell Card, Trap Card, or Effect Monster's effect that destroys a card(s) on the field, and destroy that card. If you negate an effect this way, you can Special Summon this card from your Graveyard during the End Phase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notcleverusername Posted February 14, 2017 Report Share Posted February 14, 2017 They errata'd to make it that way. Evil is right on the return vs SS deal though. Blazar returns in the cost, the original stardust did no.As far as it goes, the errata was done to make the text line up with how it was supposed to function, rather than actually changing the function. Anyways everything has already been covered with one exceptionI legitimately think it's fair to say that even considering multiple attacks, this card is absolutely better than Quasar.Not that it really should matter because, as per usual, if you have achieved the materials needed to summon this you have achieved the materials to probably loop half your deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.