Dad Posted October 3, 2016 Report Share Posted October 3, 2016 That tends to happen when you put two clowns in different costumes in one arena. They're gonna sling mud pies and the only people who are gonna get hit are US citizens. EDIT: LMAO Clinton asked to use a drone on the Wikileaks guy. Holy sheet, what a dumbass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Jesse Posted October 3, 2016 Report Share Posted October 3, 2016 Maybe, but I somehow doubt the foreign minister was signing papers without first asking Gaddafi. One of the many things Killary killed was Obama's legacy Another Update: FBI made side deals with 2 HRC associates to "destroy" their laptops after inspecting them. More sketchy. Might be wrong on this, but there was a congressional subpoena active at that time period right? When people wonder why the FBI's approval rating with the public tanked from being around the level of Police and Military to around the level of the president, this kinda deal might be http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-02/clinton-campaign-admits-hillary-used-same-tax-avoidance-scheme-trump Clinton Campaign Admits Hillary Used Same Tax Avoidance "Scheme" As Trump "Those in glass houses should not throw rocks" There's a clear difference by virtue of the scale. It's not the same. Hillary stiffed America out of enough money to buy a nice house. Trump stiffed America out of enough money to launch two space shuttles. But it's not even about that. Trump lambasted people for not paying taxes. Multiple times. While not doing so himself. He's a hypocrite, and either a liar and a thief or an awful businessman who doesn't make as much money as he claims. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted October 3, 2016 Report Share Posted October 3, 2016 There's a clear difference by virtue of the scale. It's not the same. Hillary stiffed America out of enough money to buy a nice house. Trump stiffed America out of enough money to launch two space shuttles. But it's not even about that. Trump lambasted people for not paying taxes. Multiple times. While not doing so himself. He's a hypocrite, and either a liar and a thief or an awful businessman who doesn't make as much money as he claims.Or none of the above. I've already explained how you can make money and declare a negative income. And we don't know if Trump paid no taxes. And he's admitted that he was part of the problem... That's one thing, you'll find HRC does that a lot in her returns and good for her there. "Hillary" may have stiffed America of 5billion, Trump may have stiffed himself of 1 billion he made back 4 fold in 2 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted October 3, 2016 Report Share Posted October 3, 2016 Taxes go to the funding of states and the country. It's not that we don't know he didn't pay them. We have proof. He stiffed the country, and strained people like me. It's that simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted October 3, 2016 Report Share Posted October 3, 2016 Taxes go to the funding of states and the country. It's not that we don't know he didn't pay them. We have proof. He stiffed the country, and strained people like me. It's that simple.No you have proof he could have "stiffed" people like you, nothing more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted October 3, 2016 Report Share Posted October 3, 2016 No you have proof he could have "stiffed" people like you, nothing moreOh, it's a could have now? What happened to all that praise for gaming the system and admitting he did it? Are we taking that back, pretending it didn't happen? Which funking one is it? I thought it was all okay because "he talked about it and admitted his mistakes". You better God damn clear it up because you're flip flopping from a page and a half ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted October 4, 2016 Report Share Posted October 4, 2016 Oh, it's a could have now? What happened to all that praise for gaming the system and admitting he did it? Are we taking that back, pretending it didn't happen? Which funking one is it?I thought it was all okay because "he talked about it and admitted his mistakes". You better God damn clear it up because you're flip flopping from a page and a half ago.No, no. All the NYT proved was he could have. Trump admitted he did http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2016/10/04/wikileaks-assange-promises-leaks-election/91524362/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter&hootPostID=6edf5d7d26a537884d97d4784071b25a Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerion Brightflame Posted October 4, 2016 Report Share Posted October 4, 2016 So let's add to the list of Trumps woes. The Attorney General in New York has ordered a cease and desist over the Trump Foundation solicitating without a permit. In doing so he's demanded the past 3 years of audits from the foundation to be provided within 15 days. Either he gives them up and the Foundations job as a slush fund is made public, or they simply don't have the audits and Trump gets slammed. On top of the wikileaks thing which in my mind confirms it doesnt exist. This is like the 5th time he's said he's going to bury her and there's just nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted October 4, 2016 Report Share Posted October 4, 2016 On top of the wikileaks thing which in my mind confirms it doesnt exist. This is like the 5th time he's said he's going to bury her and there's just nothing.https://guccifer2.wordpress.com/2016/10/04/clinton-foundation Ask and he shall appear, this is just guccifer atm, Assange and O'keffe are coming up too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Jesse Posted October 4, 2016 Report Share Posted October 4, 2016 Turns out he didn't and turns out all of that information was available to the public already. https://twitter.com/nickconfessore/status/783397272394600450https://twitter.com/nickconfessore/status/783400062370123777https://twitter.com/nickconfessore/status/783403625154568192 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted October 4, 2016 Report Share Posted October 4, 2016 Turns out he didn't and turns out all of that information was available to the public already. https://twitter.com/nickconfessore/status/783397272394600450https://twitter.com/nickconfessore/status/783400062370123777https://twitter.com/nickconfessore/status/783403625154568192You're both right and wrong. CF has DNC files on server. Why if they're a charity? Some of the information was available from the previous DCCC leaks though, yes. Still funneling TARP money to political campaigns, wonder how many avg Americans knew that was a thing There isn't anything illegal here as far as I can see, just shows the internal rotting of Washington...might be a case with FEC violation and misappropriations though. Bigfish (Assange apparently) is still tomorrow this is cute Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Jesse Posted October 5, 2016 Report Share Posted October 5, 2016 How many straws are even left for you to grasp? A lot, apparently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted October 5, 2016 Report Share Posted October 5, 2016 How many straws are even left for you to grasp? A lot, apparently.As many as I need to stop the wicked witch of the west from stepping foot in the WH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted October 5, 2016 Report Share Posted October 5, 2016 As many as I need to stop the wicked witch of the west from stepping foot in the WHWhy? Because you want the deranged Oompa Loompa with a fake tan to have it instead?Every step of this election has revolved around a recurring narrative: Trump is the one that everyone needs to be defeated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted October 5, 2016 Report Share Posted October 5, 2016 Why? Because you want the deranged Oompa Loompa with a fake tan to have it instead?After seeing Pence today? Sure, there's a good guiding fall back with Trump, I saw no such thing with Kaine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizarus Posted October 5, 2016 Report Share Posted October 5, 2016 Pence tried to defund Planned Parenthood every chance he got, tried to defund HIV treatment and create his gay-straight conversion therapy, and denied the pardon of an innocent man because of "tradition". He may actually be worse than Trump, he just not on Twitter looking for the first person who attacks him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted October 5, 2016 Report Share Posted October 5, 2016 Pence tried to defund Planned Parenthood every chance he gotOh no, he tried to defund system genocide...what is the world coming to I meant he's a more competent politician Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerion Brightflame Posted October 5, 2016 Report Share Posted October 5, 2016 Oh no, he tried to defund system genocide...what is the world coming to I meant he's a more competent politician But abortion is only a fraction of the services planned parenthood provides. You probably increase the number of abortions defunding it because you'd cut down on the number of people who have access to the pill or other contraception. Because a lack of those things won't stop people f***ing. How about all the women's health stuff it helps with as well? He's also more bought than Hillary is - The guy spends time trying to deny cigarettes cause lung cancer. There aren't that many politicians who are that beholden to corporate donors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted October 5, 2016 Report Share Posted October 5, 2016 The guy spends time trying to deny cigarettes cause lung cancer.Do you have a link for this? I would love a good laugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted October 5, 2016 Report Share Posted October 5, 2016 Do you have a link for this? I would love a good laugh. "smoking doesn't kill, 2 out of 3 smokers don't die from it" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted October 5, 2016 Report Share Posted October 5, 2016 "smoking doesn't kill, 2 out of 3 smokers don't die from it"Only now am I mentally relating the legality of tobacco to the legality of suicide. It is hyperbole, but it really comes down to the same moral dilemma. Huh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted October 5, 2016 Report Share Posted October 5, 2016 I get critique over Pence signing the Religious Freedom Restoration Act that overwhelmingly passed the state congress Why does nobody talk about him signing the amendment a week later defending LGBT individuals? http://www.indystar.com/story/news/politics/2015/04/01/indiana-rfra-deal-sets-limited-protections-for-lgbt/70766920/ Hillary's Townhall in Haverford PA Where She Stages Question with Child Actor This is cute...and kinda desperate, but cute Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted October 5, 2016 Report Share Posted October 5, 2016 I get critique over Pence signing the Religious Freedom Restoration Act that overwhelmingly passed the state congress Why does nobody talk about him signing the amendment a week later defending LGBT individuals?2 reasons. 1.) We aren't supporting him, so why bother?2.) It doesn't really negate him signing the aforementioned act which, even if it had received overwhelming support, is still super funked up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted October 5, 2016 Report Share Posted October 5, 2016 2 reasons. 1.) We aren't supporting him, so why bother?2.) It doesn't really negate him signing the aforementioned act which, even if it had received overwhelming support, is still super funked up.It's a bit disingenuous is all I'm saying. If you're willing to give HRC credit for going from quite anti-LGBT to supporting it, which you should on that regard, I'd think you should also bring this up for the sake of objectivity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted October 5, 2016 Report Share Posted October 5, 2016 People don't support a candidate they are opposed to. You don't do it, we don't do it. It just isn't a thing that happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.