Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted February 29, 2016 Report Share Posted February 29, 2016 As much as we'd like to get the hell out of the Middle East, can't really because of our allies in that area (which is basically Israel and think Turkey). Obama wanted to get our men out of there by 2011 or something (correct me if I'm wrong), but circumstances otherwise made him backtrack. ----Going back to election stuff, I don't care for Cruz at all (especially if he indeed decides to institute religious beliefs into our system if elected, despite the "separation of church and state" thing). Then again, he (along with Trump and Rubio) are playing dirty at this point, and really, I do not want our next president to be someone who engages in this kind of crap. I don't exactly have a political party preference, but here's my results on stuff: 88% on Clinton. 85% on Sanders and 61% with Kasich [spoiler=stuff] So yeah, mostly Democrat, I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted February 29, 2016 Report Share Posted February 29, 2016 As I stated at the press conference on Friday "regarding David Duke- I disavow" This was Tweeted 12 hours ago, and publicly spoken before that on friday, yet Liberal media still printing articles about Trump not disavowing the KKK.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
epicmemesbro Posted February 29, 2016 Report Share Posted February 29, 2016 Shame Rand is out, we would've done whatever he could to get out us out of the middle east. Russia is more involved there than we are anyway; let them handle it. Trump straight up told O' Reily that he wanted to go in just to get American oil companies in there. Cruz would probably send in an entire theatre of operations to the middle east and wreak havoc on all factions, even allies, something that Trump and Rubio hesitated to answer when asked if they would send in ground forces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted February 29, 2016 Report Share Posted February 29, 2016 Shame Rand is out, we would've done whatever he could to get out us out of the middle east. Russia is more involved there than we are anyway; let them handle it. Trump straight up told O' Reily that he wanted to go in just to get American oil companies in there. Cruz would probably send in an entire theatre of operations to the middle east and wreak havoc on all factions, even allies, something that Trump and Rubio hesitated to answer when asked if they would send in ground forces.Sending in ground forces is stupid, you need to do gas attacks on Raqqa and Mosul and let the Russians clean matters up after. Cruz and Rubio won't have a good relationship with Russia, Trump and maybe Sanders will. This needs addressing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mutant Monster RAEG-HAPYP Posted March 1, 2016 Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 Sending in ground forces is stupid, you need to do gas attacks on Raqqa and Mosul and let the Russians clean matters up after. Cruz and Rubio won't have a good relationship with Russia, Trump and maybe Sanders will. This needs addressingClimate change? It really does, but realistically, it probably won't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted March 1, 2016 Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 Climate change? It really does, but realistically, it probably won't. Unfortunately true. Mention climate change and you're instantly an enemy of the state. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted March 1, 2016 Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 http://www.bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/2016/02/amid_trump_surge_nearly_20000_mass_voters_quit_democratic_party MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 Clinton Won Virgina and Georgia, Sanders won Vermont...not too surprising. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 Clinton Won Virgina and Georgia, Sanders won Vermont...not too surprising. >0% reporting Come back to me when its 30% reporting please. I don't like it when people call things at 0%. It's okay to make predictions, though not a definite he/she won at 0%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 >0% reporting Come back to me when its 30% reporting please. I don't like it when people call things at 0%. It's okay to make predictions, though not a definite he/she won at 0%.I mean they usually have scanned a majority of the votes at this point, they just haven't reported the exact numbers yet. But I promise those wins/losses won't change regardless of what % reporting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 I mean they usually have scanned a majority of the votes at this point, they just haven't reported the exact numbers yet. But I promise those wins/losses won't change regardless of what % reporting Nothing is certain, which is why I suggest waiting to call something until you have enough data to make a call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 Well Trump won basically everything so far, the only state that it isn't called so far is Virginia, and 60% reporting, he's 7% up. Scoop em up Rubio :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerion Brightflame Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 So footage and such is coming out of multiple co-ordinated attempts by Hillary officials to block voting from happening for hours at a time. And by officials, I mean Bill Clinton himself, campaigning within 150 feet of multiple voting booths, campainging for Hillary with a megaphone, for hours, at multiple different stations across the day. And because you know, he's an ex president, when he makes a public appearance a lot of stuff gets shut down a long way around him.The mayor of New Bedford (Where this occured iirc), was entirely fine with this and made no attempt to stop it. Which is all eating into the limited amount of time a lot of voters have to vote. Which is awful for democracy, and much worse for Sanders than Clinton (Obviously). Said uploader was also told she couldn't wear a Sanders shirt at this event, because it was apparently a 'Hillary Campaign event', despite the fact again it's within 150 feet of a voting booth, and thus illegal. Forced to remove a shirt for Sanders whilst Bill Clinton was signing support Hillary boards within the vicinity. Admittedly the punishment for breaking it is a 20 dollar fine, which I'm sure the Clinton's will struggle to pay for. It's just complete and utter bollocks that they did this, and that they will get away with it. Completely and utterly bollocks; because you know this is probably happening at other places around the country for similar reasons to achieve a similar effect. EDIT; It could technically be worse than it appears, because there's an argument to be made that if Bill Clinton's security detail stopped anyone fro voting, it's arguably government employee's suppressing voters, which is not something that should happen in this part of the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6TErhnAXDg WTF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
epicmemesbro Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 I think Voter ID should be the norm. Its like needing a license to drive. You need to prove that it's you to engage in this official activity.Those who are against it are encouraging voter fraud. Mind blown, but now that I think of it more, I'm not that surprised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 Funny, cause Voter fraud just won your boy Texas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 While the South isn't looking good for Sanders, he did prevent a sweep by winning Oklahoma. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 Looks like pretty boy Rubio might win one, shame :/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKmKVBiGLlk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tentacruel Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 So footage and such is coming out of multiple co-ordinated attempts by Hillary officials to block voting from happening for hours at a time. And by officials, I mean Bill Clinton himself, campaigning within 150 feet of multiple voting booths, campainging for Hillary with a megaphone, for hours, at multiple different stations across the day. And because you know, he's an ex president, when he makes a public appearance a lot of stuff gets shut down a long way around him.The mayor of New Bedford (Where this occured iirc), was entirely fine with this and made no attempt to stop it. Which is all eating into the limited amount of time a lot of voters have to vote. Which is awful for democracy, and much worse for Sanders than Clinton (Obviously). Said uploader was also told she couldn't wear a Sanders shirt at this event, because it was apparently a 'Hillary Campaign event', despite the fact again it's within 150 feet of a voting booth, and thus illegal. Forced to remove a shirt for Sanders whilst Bill Clinton was signing support Hillary boards within the vicinity. Admittedly the punishment for breaking it is a 20 dollar fine, which I'm sure the Clinton's will struggle to pay for. It's just complete and utter bollocks that they did this, and that they will get away with it. Completely and utterly bollocks; because you know this is probably happening at other places around the country for similar reasons to achieve a similar effect. EDIT; It could technically be worse than it appears, because there's an argument to be made that if Bill Clinton's security detail stopped anyone fro voting, it's arguably government employee's suppressing voters, which is not something that should happen in this part of the world. The funk is this sheet. funking cretins are outright evil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 The funk is this sheet. funking cretins are outright evil. Did you miss how the ballots were rigged to change from Trump to Rubio in Texas, even the Judge accepted it. They needed a Cruz victory and they gave it to him Would literally vote for Bernie over Reptilian Cruz or Rubot though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
epicmemesbro Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 Funny, cause Voter fraud just won your boy TexasHe did it to show us how anyone can vote without proper identification. Clever Cruz.Also, dude, where is your chill? He was tied with Bernie.Although I didn't play devils advocate per say, I did vote for stuff I would want in my position, even if its against what I'd prefer... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 Cruz is a cold hearted jabroni, Donald softened his stance on immigration. Not letting the families with children back in is reptilian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 Sanders leads in Colorado and Minnesota and wins in Vermont and Oklahoma atm. Massachusetts is still too close to call with both Sanders and Clinton having had a mess at one time or another, though Clinton's lead is shrinking there. Sanders could walk away with 5/11 Super Tuesday states. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 Sanders won Colorado, Rubio wins his first state in Minnesota Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizarus Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 I dont see Sanders getting 5 states at all. He made things interesting, but Clinton pretty much has the nom at this point unless she screws up badly. Rubio is done, he's not even close to winning a single state. The GOP establishment will now have to settle with Trump or maybe Cruz, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.