Jump to content

[RESULTS ARE FINAL] 2016 Election for President of the United States | Donald Trump Victory


cr47t

Recommended Posts

so essentially trumps switching the peeson in charge of his campaign? only time will tell how good that goes over, on another note...

 

 

TRUMP WORLD

Field spell

When this card is activated, send all "illegal" monsters on the field back to their original countries. As long as you control a face-up "Donald Trump" monster, neither player can Illegally Special Summon monsters from outside the United States. Mexico must pay 500 life points each turn to build your wall, if they do not, this card is destroyed.

Remember the Cruz wife scandel and how Trump got hammered in Wisconsin. Paul Manafort was the one that engineered the Northern Strategy and secure the nom for Trump. It's a good thing tbqh

 

Make Ivanka VP is all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

So Trump is closing on Penn & Ohio, but he tanked in Florida after the Judge s***

 

Which means 294 to 244 in Hillary's favor

 

If Trump manages to take Virginia too, then it's 281 to 257

 

close but no banana's

There's pretty much no viable path for Trump to the White House that doesn't involve Florida. But judging by the conditions of his campaign's finances, I don't think he has the gas in the tank to carry through. Clinton had $32 of in-pocket money for every dollar of Trump's; and the whole Draper-Sterling revelation is likely going to make it even harder for him to attract GOP donors. I really can't imagine how this will snowball any more, but I know it will. This cycle is such a shitstorm...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's pretty much no viable path for Trump to the White House that doesn't involve Florida. But judging by the conditions of his campaign's finances, I don't think he has the gas in the tank to carry through. Clinton had $32 of in-pocket money for every dollar of Trump's; and the whole Draper-Sterling revelation is likely going to make it even harder for him to attract GOP donors. I really can't imagine how this will snowball any more, but I know it will. This cycle is such a shitstorm...

Trump can self-finance himself and tell the other republicans to go funk themselves

 

You wouldn't need a billion dollars to run a general election campaign just for yourself. He just needs to secure Florida, Penn, and Ohio. Maybe defend Arizona and NC

 

Virginia is a stretch, but might be nice to have

 

 

Speaking of Florida, Rubio is running for re-election so that seat is safe 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/06/23/second_veteran_of_96_convention_joins_trump_team_130988.html

 

Trump Campaign is turning around maybe? His speech yesterday got positive reviews

 

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/284609-poll-sanders-rubio-most-popular-vp-picks

 

Basically Trump is screwed seeing that Rubio is already re-running for senate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In regards to Trump / Opinions ever shifting / What's the true passion?

 

(Translation: Trump seems to go back and forth with what he believes and how people see him, and it's getting even more difficult to determine what he's all about and what the people voting for him are voting for exactly.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In regards to Trump / Opinions ever shifting / What's the true passion?

 

(Translation: Trump seems to go back and forth with what he believes and how people see him, and it's getting even more difficult to determine what he's all about and what the people voting for him are voting for exactly.)

America first is really what it boils down to

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the question is will Sanders people vote Hillary. Which is far less certain. If Brexit and Austria showed us anything, it's that nationalism is being underestimated this year

 

Securing the Rust Belt is easy enough for Trump atm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 So weird because Trump is supporting something that made the world financial markets lose 2 trillion dollars

 
Well for starters, emphasis needs to be placed on world financial markets
 
England isn't nearly as bad off as the ominous 2Tn value suggests. We were all expecting a shockwave if brexit hit, and some people wisely sold their stocks in lue of the small remain bump right before the wales result
 
 

I mean Trump made comments earlier supporting Scotland for it's decision to Leave the EU.

 

There's evidence he didn't think all of the information through when it came to commenting on Brexit

Secondly, Trump's words were praising tourism. If the pound drops relative to the dollar and other currencies, then people are also more likely to visit England, and Scotland at that. 
 
Thirdly, loans and interest rates are an low, now is the time for English people to start investing cause the pound will only appreciate from here. So people trying to get their foot into the market will have it easy now. 
 
There is a LOT to gain out of brexit, but all people see is the buzz word 2TN figure
 
The goal was to free the UK from a lot of the overbearing restrictions imposed by the EU, and in the long run cutting down on those and immigration will allow for the UK growth to increase. Nobody excepted results immediately 
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm aware that the current economic turmoil it caused is temporary. I'm aware the benefits are about lesser restriction (Even though I think most of the likely post EU deals involve us still having to abide by these conditions we just have no say in them anymore). 

 

But right now the issue isn't about growth for most people. The issue is about the fact a) A large portion of voters either voted in protest, or didn't realise what the EU actually did for them because they were ignorant funkers so people are regretting things, and b) There are hundred of millions of pounds (If not Billions) of grants that now need to be debating for replacement for Westminster. None of which is guaranteed. On top of all the other sheet we need renegotiating that affects a lot of people.

 

We are talking research grants that make us a world leader in many fields. We are talking money that was spent on maintaining vital infrastructure like roads, and trains and Wi-Fi in the poorer parts of the nation. Free University tutition in Wales is under threat as a result of this. 

 

There is a lot to gain - But right now people can't care about what they are gaining, they need to minimise what they are losing. Additionally because most people have jack all knowledge of finances, what is likely to happen is we see the 1% get richer and the 99% get poorer, just like in 2008, and that just sucks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm aware that the current economic turmoil it caused is temporary. I'm aware the benefits are about lesser restriction (Even though I think most of the likely post EU deals involve us still having to abide by these conditions we just have no say in them anymore). 

 

But right now the issue isn't about growth for most people. The issue is about the fact a) A large portion of voters either voted in protest, or didn't realise what the EU actually did for them because they were ignorant funkers so people are regretting things, and b) There are hundred of millions of pounds (If not Billions) of grants that now need to be debating for replacement for Westminster. None of which is guaranteed. On top of all the other sheet we need renegotiating that affects a lot of people.

 

We are talking research grants that make us a world leader in many fields. We are talking money that was spent on maintaining vital infrastructure like roads, and trains and Wi-Fi in the poorer parts of the nation. Free University tutition in Wales is under threat as a result of this. 

 

There is a lot to gain - But right now people can't care about what they are gaining, they need to minimise what they are losing. Additionally because most people have jack all knowledge of finances, what is likely to happen is we see the 1% get richer and the 99% get poorer, just like in 2008, and that just sucks. 

Shouldn't we educate our children on this then? People should care. American stocks lost money. I lost money, but I've nearly made it up in by just re-investing and shorting. It's too late for our generation most likely, but this was a pretty ripe opportunity for the 99% to make some gains out of the matter based on the drops. Ignorance isn't a virtue and shouldn't be accepted or tolerated

 

What needs to be done now is for y'all to hold your governments feet to the fire. Instead of focusing on a second ref or other tangent matters, the balls in your court now. Make sure that 350K is accounted for. Maybe not all of it will go to the NHS, but some portion of it can. This is a time for re-invention of England as far as I can see it Tom, and people are just giving the politicians an undeserved break by not reminding them of that.

 

That aside

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/06/25/trump-now-says-muslim-ban-only-applies-to-those-from-terrorism-heavy-countries/

 

More moderation 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ugh, this is not going to look good on him. his stance might be solidifying, but it's doing so in the least favorable way possible. this is a flip-flop if i ever saw one. his original stance was hardline, but he's going the pacifist route with all these changes. yeah, he had to go hard right to get the republican votes, but this is a clear shift in his main stance that is obviously different from hs original proposition. i can understand softening the stance to get votes, but he's stabbing his record in the foot when he jumps his original ship to this degree this far in the race.

 

 he could have just kept calling it mass deportation, if that's what it is, that's what it is, but nope, he drops it in such a way that there is no denying he's hard flopping. not a good look at all for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ugh, this is not going to look good on him. his stance might be solidifying, but it's doing so in the least favorable way possible. this is a flip-flop if i ever saw one. his original stance was hardline, but he's going the pacifist route with all these changes. yeah, he had to go hard right to get the republican votes, but this is a clear shift in his main stance that is obviously different from hs original proposition. i can understand softening the stance to get votes, but he's stabbing his record in the foot when he jumps his original ship to this degree this far in the race.

 

 he could have just kept calling it mass deportation, if that's what it is, that's what it is, but nope, he drops it in such a way that there is no denying he's hard flopping. not a good look at all for him.

It's not a flip flop. He always said he would keep the good ones. That's basically what this is. As long as they don't get citizenship or amnesty I'm cool. Mainly we need to keep it from further happening.

 

Hitler took many years to mass murder 11 million people, how are we supposed to humanely deport 11 million in a year or so? It was never doable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not a flip flop. He always said he would keep the good ones. That's basically what this is. As long as they don't get citizenship or amnesty I'm cool. Mainly we need to keep it from further happening.

 

Hitler took many years to mass murder 11 million people, how are we supposed to humanely deport 11 million in a year or so? It was never doable

true, true, but his stance is still that of mass deportation, true, he might only go after those with negative influences, and yes, he might even assist those already here who are actually putting in positive work, but he needs to call a spade a spade. and that's what i'm getting at, the way he's speaking really has that flip-flop to it. he can keep the compassion, but he also needs to keep the steel that came before it. otherwise he really will be flip flopping on his stance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

true, true, but his stance is still that of mass deportation, true, he might only go after those with negative influences, and yes, he might even assist those already here who are actually putting in positive work, but he needs to call a spade a spade. and that's what i'm getting at, the way he's speaking really has that flip-flop to it. he can keep the compassion, but he also needs to keep the steel that came before it. otherwise he really will be flip flopping on his stance.

Maybe like a compassionate side to those who have worked hard and long in the US for a better life and haven't messed that up

 

But on the other hand, a extremely brutal stance towards those with criminal records and anyone who breaks the border anymore. I think he can get the cubans if he keep showing a bit of compassion and keep the rest as long as he keeps up the wall

 

Maybe throw in a project to find and collapse the tunnels as well as be very strict on Visa overstays

 

Time will tell if between this and Brexit he gets the boost he needs back

 

As for his Muslim policy, I dunno. I'm glad he's staying firm to keeping those from terrorist affiliated countries out, and letting those in from other countries gives him a loop hole around the 1st amendment because it's not a region test as much as a terrorism threat. That was cleverly done, this immigration thing, I think he went a little too left for my likeing, but oh well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

understandable i guess, but i still think hes curving to hard right now. it's easy to see, and it's definitely going to be a turnoff to many current, and potential supporters, especially those who aren't following all to closely.

 

 

the problem is that the way he presented it really does weaken his overall stance, i can see the sentiment remains, but it's being presented completely wrong. he has to keep the steel in his stance visible, while stressing that he is not unwilling to give chance to those who are actively productive. that's why changing what he calls it to such a degree is a bad move. he will lose his presence if he softens his voice, the way things are going, like it or not, the only person stopping trumps' momentum, is trump, and sadly, he's doing it far too well.

 

i'd assume that comes with the ideal already, no point making a wall if there's alternate tunnels.

 

 

brexit was really good for trump, and the call for recount might actually solidify him with those Americans with similar mindsets to the leave campaign, they aren't connected at the hip, but the overall sentiment can only help him so far as anti-establishment goes. and even on the other side, those Americans who were for the remain side, but see the recount call as childish might actually develop some common ground. it's really only gonna help him as long as he himself doesn't try to milk it completely. touch on it, but leave it alone for the most part, let the media do it for him.

 

his muslim policy has the same steel it's always had, so there's that going for him. it was handled far more rigidly than his overall illegal immigration plans, and that's what he needs right now. it's fine to lean a bit, but keep things as rigid as he can, or it'll come back to bite him.

 

eh, either way, time'll tell i guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...