Jump to content

Stephen Hawking black hole theory confirmed?


cr47t

Recommended Posts

Well 

 

Particle + Anti-Particle = Photons (E=MC^2)

 

Photons can subsequently break down (E/C^2=M)

 

So the blackhole can slowly lose mass as energy is slowly lost

 

Or one of the photons created could escape while the other gets dragged in

 

But idk if you would say black holes aren't black because of that

 

The fascinating use of Blackholes is weaponizing MBH. Seeing that they do a near 100% MC^2 transformation. It's basically the next generation of "clean" nukes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well 

 

Particle + Anti-Particle = Photons (E=MC^2)

 

Photons can subsequently break down (E/C^2=M)

 

So the blackhole can slowly lose mass as energy is slowly lost

 

Or one of the photons created could escape while the other gets dragged in

 

But idk if you would say black holes aren't black because of that

 

The fascinating use of Blackholes is weaponizing MBH. Seeing that they do a near 100% MC^2 transformation. It's basically the next generation of "clean" nukes

Black holes as a weapon... oh boy, I seriously hope that doesn't happen; it can have the potential to kill the earth and I doubt even the people who would be weaponizing it would want that to happen (for the most part.)

 

Also I don't understand what MBH is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Black holes as a weapon... oh boy, I seriously hope that doesn't happen; it can have the potential to kill the earth and I doubt even the people who would be weaponizing it would want that to happen (for the most part.)

 

Also I don't understand what MBH is.

Micro Black Holes

 

Regular Blackholes take Billions of years to convert their mass to energy, MBH do it in fractions of a second

 

It's a clean nuke realistically speaking. It woundn't destroy the earth at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...