Dad Posted June 11, 2016 Report Share Posted June 11, 2016 Trump tanked in recent polls actually. Going after that damn judge really bit him hard 11% drop w/ Independents and a 3% drop with Republicans He's still ahead of Hills with Independents, but polls about 3% behind her overall nationally That's possibly the most shocking and interesting thing in this entire God damned thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted June 11, 2016 Report Share Posted June 11, 2016 That's possibly the most depressing thing in this entire God damned thread.Yeah, there's a reason I've been really critical of him recently. He shot himself in the foot and threw out what made him special. Now we'll just have to see if he can get it back after the Hillary hype is over Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tentacruel Posted June 12, 2016 Report Share Posted June 12, 2016 What a badass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goose Posted June 12, 2016 Report Share Posted June 12, 2016 Man. You niggas stir up more drama than females. "Well technically she wouldn't be ________." "Well technically _____ came first." God damn. I didn't know YCM was first on politics. Scuse my french, but funk if Hilary wins bruh. She polls behind Trump (even though I don't like him). Not to mention more people dislike her than they do Trump. So it's w/e. Not sure if you're a troll or just dumb. Clinton has polled ahead of Trump in all but one legit poll where the MoE made it a tie anyway. Last I checked Trump was also significantly more disliked than Clinton. Y'all need to get your head out of /r/the_donald and back to reality. EDIT: jk it was out of MoE ONCE in a poll by a pollster who are on average 2 percentage points off towards the GOP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vla1ne Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 as for the main topic, on most technicalities, and on any official methods, edith wasn't a president, but on the other hand, she WAS the first woman to field the full power of president, even if only for a short time, and even if it wasn't exactly through legal methods. so while the argument for her being the first president is somewhat weak, the argument that women never have been barred from wielding power and status is very strong. it proves that government has no bars to women wielding that level of power, women simply haven't reached for it, for whatever reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.