Yu-Gi-Oh! Rulings Questions

[evil cucumber]

I summon Azure-Eyes Silver Dragon, thus activating its mandatory effect. On the next turn, I bring out a Black Rose Moonlight Dragon from the Extra Deck by tributing my face-up Blue-Eyes Spirit Dragon on the field. Will Moonlight be destroyed during the End Phase or Azure's effect hasn't ended yet?

[Progenitor]

I summon Azure-Eyes Silver Dragon, thus activating its mandatory effect. On the next turn, I bring out a Black Rose Moonlight Dragon from the Extra Deck by tributing my face-up Blue-Eyes Spirit Dragon on the field. Will Moonlight be destroyed during the End Phase or Azure's effect hasn't ended yet?

Assuming Azure was summoned on your Opponent's Turn, then Moonlight should be protected.  Otherwise, it goes bye bye

[TF2_The_Scout]

Does "end of the turn" come after the End Phase or is it during?

[Progenitor]

Does "end of the turn" come after the End Phase or is it during?

end of the turn is considered "The end of the End Phase" in terms of timing.  Technically they both have the same timing, but effects that specify "end phase" will go before effects that specify "End of Turn"

[IQuitDolphin]

Assuming Azure was summoned on your Opponent's Turn, then Moonlight should be protected.  Otherwise, it goes bye bye

 

To add on to that; Azure-Eyes's trigger effect only applies to the current Dragon-types in your control when it's summoned, so if Moonlight was summoned some time after Azure's trigger effect resolves, then it wouldn't be protected.

[Miror B]

"Effects occur before conditions" is not a rule to follow by?

The idea is there but you're correct, this is not an actual rule.

The rule follows the same idea as things like Veiler vs Lightsworns, where turn player chooses to activate/resolve an effect/condition/lingering effect, then non-turn player chooses, then turn player MUST resolve a mandatory effect/condition/lingering effect.

 

In this case, since the player both activated Tele and controls Tin Can, they may choose which to activate/apply first, meaning they can choose to use Tin Can's effect before it's banished, or may choose to banish Tin Can before it can activate.

[Northern Sage]

Zushin attacks Cat's Ear Tribe, what happens?

[Atypical-Abbie]

Zushin attacks Cat's Ear Tribe, what happens?

Cat Ear is continuous, so Zushin bases it off the ATK it already has. 200, then it recalculates to that new value.

[Ryusei the Morning Star]

Can you activate Pot of Avarice when you have fewer than 2 cards in your deck?

[~Faytl~]

You can activate draw effects regardless of how many cards are in your deck, nothing prevents you from decking yourself. Though in the case of Avarice, you wouldn't deck yourself since 5 monsters would be added to your deck, meaning you would keep at least 3 in there. But if you say, had Pot of Greed and had only 1 card in your deck, you could play it, it would just cause you to automatically lose.

[Miror B]

You can activate draw effects regardless of how many cards are in your deck, nothing prevents you from decking yourself.

Incorrect. You cannot activate an effect you cannot resolve, ignoring if an action would allow you to resolve it (example being tributing an opponent's Vanity's Fiend to summon a Kaiju, you can't do it.)

 

http://www.pojo.biz/board/showthread.php?t=850460

[Azuriena]

Can you activate Pot of Avarice when you have fewer than 2 cards in your deck?

 

No.

 

You can activate draw effects regardless of how many cards are in your deck, nothing prevents you from decking yourself. Though in the case of Avarice, you wouldn't deck yourself since 5 monsters would be added to your deck, meaning you would keep at least 3 in there. But if you say, had Pot of Greed and had only 1 card in your deck, you could play it, it would just cause you to automatically lose.

 

You cannot activate Pot of Greed in that case. Generally, you cannot activate a card effect if you cannot resolve all of its mandatory parts.

 

If you activate Pot of Greed with 2 or more cards in your Deck, but that number becomes 1 or lower by the time it resolves, you will deck out and lose.

[~Faytl~]

I'm sorry, I think I mixed it up with the MtG ruling on effects like that. My apologies.

 

Man, I am batting zero in every post I make in here, might be time to leave this to the professionals.

[Captain Kirk]

If I banish the tokens for Blackwing - Gofu the Hazy Shadow's effect, does it count their levels on the field?

[Atypical-Abbie]

If I banish the tokens for Blackwing - Gofu the Hazy Shadow's effect, does it count their levels on the field?

"You can banish Monster Tokens or an "Embodiment of Apophis" as an activation cost for the effect of "Unibird". In that case, you will still Special Summon a Synchro Monster whose Level is equal to or lower than the combined Levels of "Unibird" and the banished monster."

 

It will.

[Azuriena]

Edit: Got ninja'd, so I'll use this post to ask a question.

 

A Special Summon-only monster on the field that was properly Special Summoned is banished face-down by PSY-Frame Overload, then it is later returned to the Graveyard by PSY-Framelord Omega's effect. Can it be Special Summoned by Monster Reborn?

[Expelsword]

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Number_38%3A_Hope_Harbinger_Dragon_Titanic_Galaxy

 

Can Number 38 be used in the Damage Step to negate a Spell Effect? If not, why not?

I was under the impression that Quick Effects that negated (such as Stardust or its /Assault Mode counterpart, or Infernoid Devyaty) could be used during the Damage Step.

[Slinky]

I'd say yes. I don't see why it wouldn't, unless there be a BKSS running around that I don't know about.

[Azuriena]

If my Guiding Ariadne and my opponent's Odd-Eyes Gravity Dragon are applying their Continuous Effects, do I pay LP to activate Solemn Judgment?
 

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Number_38%3A_Hope_Harbinger_Dragon_Titanic_Galaxy
 
Can Number 38 be used in the Damage Step to negate a Spell Effect? If not, why not?
I was under the impression that Quick Effects that negated (such as Stardust or its /Assault Mode counterpart, or Infernoid Devyaty) could be used during the Damage Step.

Number 38 only negates the effect, not the activation, of a Spell effect. The examples you listed negate the activation of a card effect. See this.

Quick Effects that negate the activation of a card effect can be activated during the Damage Step.

[·Toot]

So question...

 

I take my opponent's Psyframe Omega with a Greydle. What happens if I use Omega's effect? I'm guessing my opponent gets it back right? The Greydle would be destroyed... Right?

 

Or just tell me how it goes down. :P

[IQuitDolphin]

It returns to their control, since the Graydle only takes control of Omega while equipped.

[·Toot]

It returns to their control, since the Graydle only takes control of Omega while equipped.

Figured. Thanks. 

[Northern Sage]

Hypothetical: If Hastorr is equipped to a monster by an effect other than its own, would its Equip Card effects still apply on that monster?

[Atypical-Abbie]

Hypothetical: If Hastorr is equipped to a monster by an effect other than its own, would its Equip Card effects still apply on that monster?

No it wouldn't, the text states that monster and "by this effect", so it's clear to me that it wouldn't affect it if equipped by other ways.

[Dragulas]

If a player destroys an ariadne and goes to extra deck, triggers and chains solemn strike, its effect is negated but since strike says negate and destroy does that would mean ariadne goes to grave or it stays in the extra deck?

 

Saw a replay of this happening so thats why im asking