Jump to content

Yu-Gi-Oh! Rulings Questions


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 16.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

On Ritual monsters, can the ones that say "This card can only be ritual summoned with *insert ritual spell here*" actually not be summoned by ARA? 'Cause if they cant', that screws over my Fortress Whale.dek :(

Advanced Ritual Art can summon ANY Ritual monster, as long as you have the normal monster requirements in the deck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What all Ritual monsters should read is "Must first be Ritual Summoned. You can Ritual Summon this card with Ritual Spell X." All Rituals can be Summoned via Advanced Ritual Art. Take note that the corresponding Ritual Spells read "You can Ritual Summon Ritual Monster Y with this card".

 

So to summarize: Ritual Monsters must be Ritual Summoned, and you may use a specific Ritual Spell to Summon them. Ritual Spells tell you what they are able to Summon. You cannot use a Ritual Spell like Shinato's Ark to Summon Dark Master - Zorc, because Shinato's Ark only can Ritual Summon Shinato. But you can use a card like Advanced Ritual Art or Contract with the Abyss to Summon Dark Master - Zorc because those Ritual Spells allow you to Ritual Summon any monster, so long as the conditions are fulfilled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this just a game error, or is this a real ruling: I was playing against my friend on YGOPro and attacked his face-down Ghosttrick Kyonshee, his only monster. with Red Dragon Archfiend. It got flipped, then destroyed by Archfiend's effect, but it did not let him get a search (and he had monsters to grab). If this is the case and it's the truth that this happens, I assume it's because RDA kills before it counts monsters for Kyonshee?

 

EDIT: Never mind, I looked it up like I should have, and that's how it works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got a question regarding hyptotetical effect that I intend to use on Xyz monster I am making:

The first effect is "While this card has Xyz Material, your opponent cannot activate card effects in response to the activation of effects of monsters you control." Then it has another effect that detaches a material as cost: "You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card: [insert effect here]".

 

Now, the question is: When that monster detaches its last material to activate its effect, the opponent can now respond with a card effect and chain it to this monster's effect, or the monster's effect has to resolve first for the opponent to be able to respond with card effects normally?

Or in other words: the first effect goes off as soon as the monster detaches its last material as cost, even if the second effect has not resolved yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got a question regarding hyptotetical effect that I intend to use on Xyz monster I am making:

The first effect is "While this card has Xyz Material, your opponent cannot activate card effects in response to the activation of effects of monsters you control." Then it has another effect that detaches a material as cost: "You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card: [insert effect here]".

 

Now, the question is: When that monster detaches its last material to activate its effect, the opponent can now respond with a card effect and chain it to this monster's effect, or the monster's effect has to resolve first for the opponent to be able to respond with card effects normally?

Or in other words: the first effect goes off as soon as the monster detaches its last material as cost, even if the second effect has not resolved yet?

 

If you remove its last material, then the Continuous Effect is not applied.  The opponent can activate an effect in response to this activation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

If I attack Kamui, Hope of Gusto with Quasar, and negate the FLIP effect with Quasar, is Kamui considered to have been destroyed by battle or by a card effect?

 

It should be considered "destroyed by battle". Flip Effects activate after a monster was considered destroyed by battle, but before they leave the Field. A destroyed card can't be destroyed again.

 

There's a slight possibility I'm wrong, but I can't find a ruling stating either way, and am basing it off the rulings regarding that Flips are considered destroyed prior to activation, preventing them from targeting themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mystic tomato to summon Clear Vice Dragon? Since it technically has 0 ATK until the battle phase when it attacks

 

No. Mystic Tomato, and indeed all searchers that are based on ATK or DEF, cannot choose a monster with ? ATK/DEF, no matter what the card's text says in regards to what that value is equal to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...