darkwolf777 Posted May 20, 2013 Report Share Posted May 20, 2013 Hmm, as a follow up to the ticket question would Warning be able to stop it in that case? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted May 20, 2013 Report Share Posted May 20, 2013 No.So that means that "if it's not for sure" that you "would" Special Summon, you can't negate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted May 20, 2013 Report Share Posted May 20, 2013 So that means that "if it's not for sure" that you "would" Special Summon, you can't negate? Solemn Warning cannot negate the activation of an effect, but the activation of a card which Special Summons. Even if it could, no effect of the activated effect of Madolche Ticket Special Summons. The effect that is being activated "Adding 1 Madolche from your deck to your hand", which has nothing to do with Special Summoning. You do need to be able to add a card to your hand in order to Special Summon a Madolche instead. If your opponent controls Thunder King Rai-Oh when this effect is triggered, it will still activate because it is mandatory, but you will not be able to Special Summon "instead" because you aren't able to do the initial effect in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted May 20, 2013 Report Share Posted May 20, 2013 Is returning a banished card considered sending it to the Graveyard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted May 20, 2013 Report Share Posted May 20, 2013 No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantasy Dreamz Posted May 21, 2013 Report Share Posted May 21, 2013 I can banish spell/trap cards for Barkion's effect, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted May 21, 2013 Report Share Posted May 21, 2013 I can banish spell/trap cards for Barkion's effect, right?Why wouldn't you be able to? It doesn't say monsters, it says cards. A card is a Monster, Spell or Trap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.codex Posted May 21, 2013 Report Share Posted May 21, 2013 Suppose you have an effect that says: "When a monster is Normal Summoned/Set: You can return this card from the Graveyard to your hand." If I had multiple of that card, could I return all 3? Also, if yes, does this apply to all situations? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hyperion Posted May 21, 2013 Report Share Posted May 21, 2013 My opponent activates Fire Fist Bear's effect and targets a monster on the field, and I chain Safe Zone to the targeted monster. Obviously it is already targeted, but will Safe Zone still prevent the destruction of that monster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted May 21, 2013 Report Share Posted May 21, 2013 My opponent activates Fire Fist Bear's effect and targets a monster on the field, and I chain Safe Zone to the targeted monster. Obviously it is already targeted, but will Safe Zone still prevent the destruction of that monster? This one is again sosomething you can read on the cd. Is says it cannot be destoyed by effects, and that doesnt just change because it has already been targeted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted May 21, 2013 Report Share Posted May 21, 2013 Suppose you have an effect that says: "When a monster is Normal Summoned/Set: You can return this card from the Graveyard to your hand." If I had multiple of that card, could I return all 3? Also, if yes, does this apply to all situations?SEGOC says yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted May 21, 2013 Report Share Posted May 21, 2013 So, I discard Tempest and Gusto Griffen to add mini Tempest to my hand. Shouldn't Griffen trigger? It doesn't on Devpro, so I'm not sure if it's a glitch, or what is is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swag swag swag swag swag s Posted May 21, 2013 Report Share Posted May 21, 2013 So, I discard Tempest and Gusto Griffen to add mini Tempest to my hand. Shouldn't Griffen trigger? It doesn't on Devpro, so I'm not sure if it's a glitch, or what is is. That's a glitch, Griffin can't miss timing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted May 21, 2013 Report Share Posted May 21, 2013 I made a mistake. I had forgotten that I used Duality. I was talking to my opponent, and I totaly forgot I had used it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted May 21, 2013 Report Share Posted May 21, 2013 Okay another question about Madolches. If there is a face-up Light & Darkness Dragon on the field & a Madolche monster is destroyed (from anywhere in my possession) will 1 neg. from LaDD stop the madolche's effect or will LaDD be put into a loop until it can no longer negate it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted May 21, 2013 Report Share Posted May 21, 2013 Okay another question about Madolches. If there is a face-up Light & Darkness Dragon on the field & a Madolche monster is destroyed (from anywhere in my possession) will 1 neg. from LaDD stop the madolche's effect or will LaDD be put into a loop until it can no longer negate it? How many times was "When this card you control is destroyed by your opponent's card (either by battle or by card effect) and sent to your Graveyard" triggered? Only once. If LaDD negates it, it will not activate again. LaDD loops involve cards whose triggers are being tripped over and over, which only occur when the trigger itself is a period of time rather than a particular moment, such as "During the End Phase", "At the End of the Battle Phase (which is during the End Step), etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted May 21, 2013 Report Share Posted May 21, 2013 If a monster with a once per turn effect is flipped face-down after using it's effect then, if it's later face-up it can activate it's effect again. Does that apply if their once per turn effect is flipping itself face-down? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted May 21, 2013 Report Share Posted May 21, 2013 If a monster with a once per turn effect is flipped face-down after using it's effect then, if it's later face-up it can activate it's effect again. Does that apply if their once per turn effect is flipping itself face-down? A "Once per turn" effect like this follows the same rules as any other "Once per turn" effect. The fact that its a "flip itself face-down" effect does not change that. If it is flipped face-down and is later flipped back up, then it can use its "Once per turn" effect again. Do note that by "Once per turn", we are referring to effect which START their effects by saying "Once per turn", not ones that end their effects with "Once per turn". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.codex Posted May 23, 2013 Report Share Posted May 23, 2013 If the Summon of Commander of the Archfiends is negated, can I summon another one and can I attack? Im asking this because it doesnt activate, so I dont know what happens if it is negated.If you control an "Archfiend" monster, you can Special Summon this card (from your hand), but if you do, this card cannot attack this turn, and you can only Special Summon "Commander of the Archfiends" this way once per turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted May 23, 2013 Report Share Posted May 23, 2013 If the Summon of Commander of the Archfiends is negated, can I summon another one and can I attack? Im asking this because it doesnt activate, so I dont know what happens if it is negated.If you control an "Archfiend" monster, you can Special Summon this card (from your hand), but if you do, this card cannot attack this turn, and you can only Special Summon "Commander of the Archfiends" this way once per turn. You cannot Special Summon another one during the same turn with its condition because the inherent Special Summon was still attempted, whether it was negated or not. The part about "attacking" only affects Commander of the Archfiends itself, not any other monsters. Inherent Special Summons do not start chains and therefore their process begins immediately as you attempt it. A card that negates the inherent summon does not negate the entire process up to the point where the monster was negated (such as when an Inherent summon asks for Tributes and such, its still a process of that Inherent Summon). Even though this card doesn't have any such processes, the inherent summon is still considered attempted by the game, so another attempt cannot be made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synchronized Posted May 24, 2013 Report Share Posted May 24, 2013 If a monster is Special Summoned by "Galaxy Zero", when "Galaxy Zero" leaves the field if the monster is still on it, does it still have its effect(s) negated? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judαs Posted May 24, 2013 Report Share Posted May 24, 2013 If Effect Veiler is activated in response to the summon of Evilswarm Castor targeting it, does the extra Summon effect still "linger" around? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysty Posted May 24, 2013 Report Share Posted May 24, 2013 If a monster is Special Summoned by "Galaxy Zero", when "Galaxy Zero" leaves the field if the monster is still on it, does it still have its effect(s) negated? Nope. Once the equip card leaves the field, the "can't attack or activate its effects" clause stops applying to the monster. If Effect Veiler is activated in response to the summon of Evilswarm Castor targeting it, does the extra Summon effect still "linger" around? There was a thread about this. Since a player had priority before Castor on the field was negated, the summon condition applies and there's nothing anyone can do about it. The only way Castor gets negated is if he is negated as soon as he hits the field (i.e., by a Continuous effect, e.g. Skill Drain). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted May 24, 2013 Report Share Posted May 24, 2013 More of a terminological question, but how would you write that you do not reveal the top cards, but you still get to look at them without your opponent seeing them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted May 24, 2013 Report Share Posted May 24, 2013 More of a terminological question, but how would you write that you do not reveal the top cards, but you still get to look at them without your opponent seeing them? "Look at the top X cards of your Deck" I believe Big Eye has that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.