darkwolf777 Posted March 12, 2013 Report Share Posted March 12, 2013 Solemn is Judgment, Warning is Warning. No one ever thinks of Solemn Wishes, but what Lapras says is correct. When someone says "Solemn", they generally mean "Solemn Judgment". People will say "Warning" if they mean "Solemn Warning". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 13, 2013 Report Share Posted March 13, 2013 No one ever thinks of Solemn Wishes, but what Lapras says is correct. When someone says "Solemn", they generally mean "Solemn Judgment". People will say "Warning" if they mean "Solemn Warning".There's a lot of Solemn cards, but nobody really uses the others. So we all ignore them in favor of laziness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cute Rotten Yoshika Posted March 13, 2013 Report Share Posted March 13, 2013 There's a lot of Solemn cards, but nobody really uses the others. So we all ignore them in favor of laziness. theres 4 but wishes and aesir might as well not exist given how often theyre used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted March 13, 2013 Report Share Posted March 13, 2013 "You can target 1 Defense Position monster you opponent control; change it to face-up Attack Position, and if you do it, negate it’s effect, also that card’s ATK becomes half of it’s original ATK until your opponent’s next End Phase." From my card, I want to write it so only the "also" effect is until the End Phase, but I am not sure if what I'm writing is applies to all of it, or only the last part. I think its the former though, so I don't know how to write it. Can anybody help? Also, there's a once per turn and monster specific clause there somewhere, just not important. Reposting since people ignored. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted March 13, 2013 Report Share Posted March 13, 2013 You can rewrite it as You can target 1 Defense Position monster your opponent controls; change it to face-up Attack Position, and if you do, negate its effects, also until your opponent's next End Phase, its ATK becomes half its original ATK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted March 13, 2013 Report Share Posted March 13, 2013 You can rewrite it asThat would work I suppose, thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted March 14, 2013 Report Share Posted March 14, 2013 Can I use Special Summon Exodius when I have an Extra Deck monster in my Graveyard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted March 14, 2013 Report Share Posted March 14, 2013 Can I use Special Summon Exodius when I have an Extra Deck monster in my Graveyard? I would say yes, because you returned a monster from the Grave to the Deck. Exodius does not specify "Main Deck", and I expect it to work the same as Pot of Avarice (although Avarice is an effect, not a Summon Condition). There doesn't seem to be a ruling right now that says either way, other than you must have at least 1 monster in your Grave to SS it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 14, 2013 Report Share Posted March 14, 2013 I have seen a number of tournament players use it (to make Gustaph Max, but these decks don't usually make it past regionals, but that's beside the point), and there has been no mention of such a ruling where it can't be summoned if you have Extra Deck monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted March 14, 2013 Report Share Posted March 14, 2013 Avarice is an effect and not a cost, to fulfill a cost you need to meet all the conditions, for example you could technically Beckoning Light back a Synchro to the extra, but you can't bounce a Synchro for Birdman. Honestly I think you can still summon it but the Extra Deck cards in the grave would stay there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted March 14, 2013 Report Share Posted March 14, 2013 Is this worded right? I want the cards banished for as long as the card is face-up on the field. >_ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted March 15, 2013 Report Share Posted March 15, 2013 Is this worded right? I want the cards banished for as long as the card is face-up on the field. >_< Don't want to lose another contest due to poor wording."while this card remains face-up on the field" is how I would word it, but that might be an old way of writing it, I don't see any faults with the wording otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyng's Old Account Posted March 15, 2013 Report Share Posted March 15, 2013 Probably a noobish question, but if I'm using them I should be sure on this: I am right in saying that Ignoble Knight of Black Laundsallyn cannot tribute itself for its own effect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted March 15, 2013 Report Share Posted March 15, 2013 Probably a noobish question, but if I'm using them I should be sure on this: I am right in saying that Ignoble Knight of Black Laundsallyn cannot tribute itself for its own effect?No, it can Tribute itself. Only if it said "an other"/this card must be face-up on the field" or something like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee Black Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 This is mainly a Bottomless Trap Hole question. I'm playing Heroes vs a Harpie player. My field is a Prisma and a set Super Poly. Their field is a set BTH and the Hunting Ground field spell. They normal summon Harpie Dancer, trigger Hunting Ground, targeting my set card. I chain Super Poly, and use both monsters for Great Tornado. Afterwards, my opponent uses BTH. My question is can BTH be used at that time? I know Hunting Ground missed, but maybe it resolves without effect? If I'm right along those lines, then I think BTH can't be activated. But if I'm wrong, can I get a quick example of when a card resolving without effect would be significant? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 This is mainly a Bottomless Trap Hole question. I'm playing Heroes vs a Harpie player. My field is a Prisma and a set Super Poly. Their field is a set BTH and the Hunting Ground field spell. They normal summon Harpie Dancer, trigger Hunting Ground, targeting my set card. I chain Super Poly, and use both monsters for Great Tornado. Afterwards, my opponent uses BTH. My question is can BTH be used at that time? I know Hunting Ground missed, but maybe it resolves without effect? If I'm right along those lines, then I think BTH can't be activated. But if I'm wrong, can I get a quick example of when a card resolving without effect would be significant? Thanks Card's don't leave the field mid-chain so the Hunting Ground would still then destroy the Super Poly before it's sent to the grave, so I believe it would miss timing, yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 Say Player A has Fire King Beast Yaksha and Hazy Flame Cerberus and Player B Normal Summons Tour Guide and Special Summons Tour Bus, then, Player A activates his Torrential Tribute, so how would the chains work? (I mean with three monsters on the field that have an effect that triggers upon being destroyed and/or sent to the Graveyard, who resolves first and whatnot.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 Say Player A has Fire King Beast Yaksha and Hazy Flame Cerberus and Player B Normal Summons Tour Guide and Special Summons Tour Bus, then, Player A activates his Torrential Tribute, so how would the chains work? (I mean with three monsters on the field that have an effect that triggers upon being destroyed and/or sent to the Graveyard, who resolves first and whatnot.)Always follow this:Turn Player's Mandatory Effects Non-Turn Player's Mandatory Effects Turn Player's Optional Effects Non-Turn Player's Optional EffectsThis means that it's Tour as Chain Link 1 and then your opponent gets to choose which order they want to activate either Yaksha or Cerberus in as Chain Link 2 and 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 This means that it's Tour as Chain Link 1 and then your opponent gets to choose which order they want to activate either Yaksha or Cerberus in as Chain Link 2 and 3.Almost.CL1: TGUCL2: TorrentialResolveCL2: Everything ont he field diesCL1: Monster is summonedNOW Fire Kings start a chain by the order you gave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 Oh oops, never mind, I didn't notice he also said Tour Guide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brinolovania Posted March 18, 2013 Report Share Posted March 18, 2013 Can Tiger King activate its effect during both turns? I cba to call an admin on this guy, so I'm probably gonna lose, but meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted March 18, 2013 Report Share Posted March 18, 2013 Can Tiger King activate its effect during both turns? I cba to call an admin on this guy, so I'm probably gonna lose, but meh. Once per turn: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card; negate the effects of all face-up Effect Monster currently on the field, except Beast-Warrior-Type, until the end of your opponent's turn This is an Ignition Effect. It can only be activated during your own turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brinolovania Posted March 18, 2013 Report Share Posted March 18, 2013 Once per turn: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card; negate the effects of all face-up Effect Monster currently on the field, except Beast-Warrior-Type, until the end of your opponent's turn This is an Ignition Effect. It can only be activated during your own turn.Thought so...just wanted to be sure I wasn't missing something. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantasy Dreamz Posted March 18, 2013 Report Share Posted March 18, 2013 If I summon TWO monsters at once with >1500 ATK and my opponent Bottomless them, I chained it with Lance Does Bottomless just gets negated entirely since it states that "Destroy that monster(s)"? Or does it still destroy the monster that didn't get Lance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cute Rotten Yoshika Posted March 18, 2013 Report Share Posted March 18, 2013 the monster not targetted by lance will be destroyed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.