Phantasy Dreamz Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 one more question...can stardust stop Imperial Order (triditionally)cause imperial doesnt say 'destroy', it says 'negate'...im just not sure if they updated imperial to 'destroy'.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 1. No. Imperial order only negate spell cards effects. It does not negate activation, nor does it destroy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SephirothKirby Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 What can you chain to Royal Decree?What can you chain to Cold Wave? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 What can you chain to Royal Decree?What can you chain to Cold Wave? Royal Decree only negates effects in the same chain that have lower Chain Link numbers than itself. So if I activate Dust Tornado and you chain Royal Decree to negate it, I am free to chain another Dust Tornado to your Royal Decree, and the second Dust will not be negated (and since Decree will be destroyed, it won't be around to negate the first one, so the first one won't be negated either). You can chain pretty much anything to Cold Wave that you could chain to any other Normal Spell you care to name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SephirothKirby Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Okay, thanks. How about "Question"? How do you rule on a card that involves something out-of-game? Can you use nicknames? What if the person has a Speech Impediment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catterjune Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 Okay' date=' thanks. How about "Question"? How do you rule on a card that involves something out-of-game? Can you use nicknames? What if the person has a Speech Impediment?[/quote'] You mean in terms of a card such as Mind Crush, where an opponent has to declare a card name... I dunno. Though I did use that concept in a fanfic. Girl was running Exodia deck against silent antagonist. Antagonist flips Mind Crush, but is silent. Exodia Girl wins. ... I'm really just rambling here now. But I think you have to declare the full name of the card. You can't say "MST" or "DAD" to hit Mystical Space Typhoon or Dark Armed Dragon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 Okay' date=' thanks. How about "Question"? How do you rule on a card that involves something out-of-game? Can you use nicknames? What if the person has a Speech Impediment?[/quote'] You mean in terms of a card such as Mind Crush, where an opponent has to declare a card name... I dunno. Though I did use that concept in a fanfic. Girl was running Exodia deck against silent antagonist. Antagonist flips Mind Crush, but is silent. Exodia Girl wins. ... I'm really just rambling here now. But I think you have to declare the full name of the card. You can't say "MST" or "DAD" to hit Mystical Space Typhoon or Dark Armed Dragon. Why would a silent person even run Mind Crush? o_O Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 Okay' date=' thanks. How about "Question"? How do you rule on a card that involves something out-of-game? Can you use nicknames? What if the person has a Speech Impediment?[/quote'] You mean in terms of a card such as Mind Crush, where an opponent has to declare a card name... I dunno. Though I did use that concept in a fanfic. Girl was running Exodia deck against silent antagonist. Antagonist flips Mind Crush, but is silent. Exodia Girl wins. ... I'm really just rambling here now. But I think you have to declare the full name of the card. You can't say "MST" or "DAD" to hit Mystical Space Typhoon or Dark Armed Dragon. Why would a silent person even run Mind Crush? o_O Pen and Paper do exist you know >_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilhorus Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 i haz a questionz i synchro summon Colossal Fighter. He is somehow destroyed in battle. His effect activates. he is the only warrior in my grave (X1 Colossal Fighter in grave). Can i special summon him via his own effect?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilhorus Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 kthnx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catterjune Posted January 21, 2009 Report Share Posted January 21, 2009 Okay' date=' thanks. How about "Question"? How do you rule on a card that involves something out-of-game? Can you use nicknames? What if the person has a Speech Impediment?[/quote'] You mean in terms of a card such as Mind Crush, where an opponent has to declare a card name... I dunno. Though I did use that concept in a fanfic. Girl was running Exodia deck against silent antagonist. Antagonist flips Mind Crush, but is silent. Exodia Girl wins. ... I'm really just rambling here now. But I think you have to declare the full name of the card. You can't say "MST" or "DAD" to hit Mystical Space Typhoon or Dark Armed Dragon. Why would a silent person even run Mind Crush? o_O "I activate a spell that allows our monsters to trade places, which would be completely useless in any other situation." - Yami (Abridged Series. Episode 13) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted January 25, 2009 Report Share Posted January 25, 2009 Curtis answered this awhile ago. (I went looking for the article, but couldn't find it) Exaple: Player A plays mind crush, calling "Zaborg" Player B showes Player A his hand, showing that he has it. Player B says "I do not have Zaborg in my hand, though I do have a 'Zabog the Thunder Monarch'" In this case, player A would still be allowed to discard the monarch, because there are no other cards call Zaborg, and is a very common short trem for the full name. I personally saw this happen at a regional, and that was how it was ruled. In your situation, if you called "Dad", then it should go through... however, it should be taken to the judge if the other play is in dissagreement. I would personally look at the deck, and if it seemed like a Dark Armed Dragon deck, then I would say that it was a valid target. Though (just as refrence) let's see this Example: Player A plays mind crush, calling "Monarch" Player B Shows his/her hand, and showes that they have Riza, and Zaborg. However, since they are both "Monarch" cards, play B would NOT discard any cards. If you call a "type" of moster like "Monarch" or "Lightsworn", then it dosn't work unless there is a card called "monarch" or "Lightsworn". In wich case you would discard it. Taken from- http://entertainment.upperdeck.com/community/forums/thread/1189265.aspx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 25, 2009 Report Share Posted January 25, 2009 And by the same token, calling "CED" would do nothing, since there are at least four unrelated cards that go by that acronym. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catterjune Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 Phantom of Chaos + Judgment Dragon RFG JD using PoC's effect. It is now your end phase. Do you mill 4? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tekken Ham Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 Phantom of Chaos + Judgment Dragon RFG JD using PoC's effect. It is now your end phase. Do you mill 4? Since you choose how effects activate in the end phase, you can choose to mill the 4 before PoC loses the effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted January 27, 2009 Report Share Posted January 27, 2009 From what I was told, monsters that include "except" in their name with a Special Summon condition (unless the requirements were properly met during the summon), cannot be returned from the Graveyard directly to the field by Monster Reborn. Is this correct? Ex: Player A: Special Summons The Dark Creator. Special Summon requirements met. Player B: Destroys it via Mirror Force. Player A: Activates Monster Reborn to return The Dark Creator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Fat Guy Posted January 27, 2009 Report Share Posted January 27, 2009 From what I was told' date=' monsters that include "except" in their name with a Special Summon condition (unless the requirements were properly met during the summon), cannot be returned from the Graveyard directly to the field by Monster Reborn. Is this correct? Ex: Player A: Special Summons The Dark Creator. Special Summon requirements met. Player B: Destroys it via Mirror Force. Player A: Activates Monster Reborn to return The Dark Creator.[/quote'] Monsters that say "This card cannot be normal summoned or set. This card can only be special summoned by blablalbalb" Can be reborned by conventional means after being properly special summoned. I believe they're called "Semi-Nomi." Examples are "The Dark Creator" and "Black Luster Soldier - Envoy of the Beginning" Monsters that say "This card cannot be normal summoned or set. This card cannot be special summoned except by blblablablaba cannot be brought back using cards like monster reborn or anything of the sort. These cards are called "Nomi" monsters. Examples include "Dark Armed Dragon" and "Judgment Dragon" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted January 27, 2009 Report Share Posted January 27, 2009 From what I was told' date=' monsters that include "except" in their name with a Special Summon condition (unless the requirements were properly met during the summon), cannot be returned from the Graveyard directly to the field by Monster Reborn. Is this correct? Ex: Player A: Special Summons The Dark Creator. Special Summon requirements met. Player B: Destroys it via Mirror Force. Player A: Activates Monster Reborn to return The Dark Creator.[/quote'] Monsters that say "This card cannot be normal summoned or set. This card can only be special summoned by blablalbalb" Can be reborned by conventional means after being properly special summoned. I believe they're called "Semi-Nomi." Examples are "The Dark Creator" and "Black Luster Soldier - Envoy of the Beginning" Monsters that say "This card cannot be normal summoned or set. This card cannot be special summoned except by blblablablaba cannot be brought back using cards like monster reborn or anything of the sort. These cards are called "Nomi" monsters. Examples include "Dark Armed Dragon" and "Judgment Dragon" Thankies. :D Rep+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valkyrie Lupia Blitzer Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 Can Elemental Hero Neos or Elemental Hero Neos Alius be treated as both the required "Hero" and "Neos" monster for the Fusion Summon of Elemental Hero Divine Neos? When Elemental Hero Prisma's name is treated as another monster, is its name treated as Elemental Hero Prisma and the monster it's name is treated as? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnSlaUghT Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 can i chain cloak and dagger to a summon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 can i chain cloak and dagger to a summon? This card must be face-up and active on the field before the declared monster is Summoned or flipped face-up. If you Chain this card’s activation to the effect of a monster that activates when that monster is Summoned or flipped face-up and declare that monster’s name' date=' it will not be removed from play. [/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnSlaUghT Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 damn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 Can Elemental Hero Neos or Elemental Hero Neos Alius be treated as both the required "Hero" and "Neos" monster for the Fusion Summon of Elemental Hero Divine Neos? They can be treated as either, but not both. So "Elemental Hero Neos" + 4 Neo-Spacians =/= Divine Neos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 can i chain cloak and dagger to a summon? No. You can, however, RESPOND to the summon with Cloak and Dagger. And in that case, the monster won't be removed from play because it had to be face-up already. You could chain it to Monster Reborn and other cards that summon another monster themselves, but you can't chain to someone declaring a Synchro/Fusion Summon so it's not easy to use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.