Yu-Gi-Oh! Rulings Questions

[-Griffin]

You can.

[Ragnus]

Here's a new question;

 

Mainly as a Secondary Win condition, Would Exodia work well in a Blackwing deck?

[-Griffin]

No.

[Aximil]

MBaaS can negate Bottomless.

 

Kal'ut cannot get around D-Fissure' date=' going to the Graveyard is part of the cost.

[/quote']

It can't?

:D

If you have 3 Glads which have all attacked, which tags first?

 

The orange one?

 

I think you can choose the order.

 

I believe you start sending them back from the deck starting with the ones closest to the Field Spell zone and working your way towards the Graveyard. That's how it always happens when I play WC09.

[-Griffin]

MBaaS can negate Bottomless.

 

Kal'ut cannot get around D-Fissure' date=' going to the Graveyard is part of the cost.

[/quote']

It can't?

:D

If you have 3 Glads which have all attacked, which tags first?

 

The orange one?

 

I think you can choose the order.

 

I believe you start sending them back from the deck starting with the ones closest to the Field Spell zone and working your way towards the Graveyard. That's how it always happens when I play WC09.

 

Point is invalid.

WCx never lets the player choose the order of effects when they should be able to.

[werewolfjedi]

Here's a new question;

 

Mainly as a Secondary Win condition' date=' Would Exodia work well in a Blackwing deck?

[/quote']

 

no, it's not a good idea.

blackwings don't have the draw power to make it viable.

[Ragnus]

Even if you're constantly shortening your deck from the effects of cards like Blackwing Whirlwind, Shura the Blue Flame, and (Potentially) Fake Feather?

[ihop]

Even if you're constantly shortening your deck from the effects of cards like Blackwing Whirlwind' date=' Shura the Blue Flame, and (Potentially) Fake Feather?

[/quote']

No.

It wastes Deck space, and Blackwings, if played right, should win before you have 3 pieces.

[werewolfjedi]

Even if you're constantly shortening your deck from the effects of cards like Blackwing Whirlwind' date=' Shura the Blue Flame, and (Potentially) Fake Feather?

[/quote']

No.

It wastes Deck space, and Blackwings, if played right, should win before you have 3 pieces.

 

unless you start with 3, which limits your opitions quite a lot.

[burnpsy]

If Mokey Mokey Smackdown is active, can Mokey's power be increased further through other means, or is it just set to 3000 until the end of the turn?

 

Stupid Example: Mokey Mokey + Axe of Despair + Smackdown. Mokey's ATK is either 3000 or 4000, which?

[werewolfjedi]

If Mokey Mokey Smackdown is active' date=' can Mokey's power be increased further through other means, or is it just set to 3000 until the end of the turn?

 

Stupid Example: Mokey Mokey + Axe of Despair + Smackdown. Mokey's ATK is either 3000 or 4000, which?

[/quote']

 

for constant and equips, 3000+ whatever, I think temp boosts fade.

[darkwolf777]

If Mokey Mokey Smackdown is active' date=' can Mokey's power be increased further through other means, or is it just set to 3000 until the end of the turn?

 

Stupid Example: Mokey Mokey + Axe of Despair + Smackdown. Mokey's ATK is either 3000 or 4000, which?

[/quote']

 

Generally when a card its ATK becomes a set value, then it is set to that value and doesn't change by other effects. If it said "its original attack becomes 3000" then continuous effects could be reapplied onto it once its original attack changed.

 

Its my guess that it is set and stays at 3000, regardless of any other effects applied on it before or after this card's effect for the remainder of the turn (Mokey Mokey Smackdown is a continuous effect after all, and Mokey Mokey Smackdown affects even Mokey Mokeys summoned after its effect was triggered). Any other affects later on that would affect the Mokey Mokey (say Rush Recklessly for example) would resolve and raise its attack by 700, but then reset back to 3000 immediately due to Mokey Mokey Smackdown's continuous effect.

 

I'm at work now, so I cannot try it myself in TF4 to see how it handles it, but according to the wording, i'm pretty confident that should be right.

 

Trying it in Tag Force 4, it does gain the ATK boosts of other continuous effects, though imo is contrary to the wording that's on Mokey Mokey Smackdown, considering its a continuous effect, it should be constantly beating down the 3000 flat ATK since its not affecting its original attack but its "ATK", hence overall ATK.

 

In any case, to answer your question correctly, other continuous effects that can affect its ATK will recalculate after the ATK is set to 3000.

 

If you guys understand what I mean, maybe you can agree that its just worded incorrectly or something (when it should say original ATK of all Mokey Mokey), or if there's something i'm not seeing as to why it would work out like that (considering its a continuous effect constantly making their "ATK" 3000, and not original ATK)

[Coffee Black]

Could Black Horn of Heaven stop Gladiator Beasts from returning to the deck to special summon another one?

[-Griffin]

No. It can hit Gyzrus, though, which is fun.

[Ragnus]

Question;

 

Is the new Shonen Jump Obelisk the Tormentor Legal?

 

If yes, does that mean it can be used in official duels?

[burnpsy]

Question;

 

Is the new Shonen Jump Obelisk the Tormentor Legal?

 

If yes' date=' does that mean it can be used in official duels?

[/quote']

 

I'll answer your question with a new question. Aside from the name of the card, does anything suggest otherwise?

[Ragnus]

Question;

 

Is the new Shonen Jump Obelisk the Tormentor Legal?

 

If yes' date=' does that mean it can be used in official duels?

[/quote']

 

I'll answer your question with a new question. Aside from the name of the card, does anything suggest otherwise?

 

I don't know. That's why i'm asking.

[burnpsy]

Question;

 

Is the new Shonen Jump Obelisk the Tormentor Legal?

 

If yes' date=' does that mean it can be used in official duels?

[/quote']

 

I'll answer your question with a new question. Aside from the name of the card, does anything suggest otherwise?

 

I don't know. That's why i'm asking.

 

Think for yourself. If you have the ability to read, you can answer the new question I have just presented.

 

Read the card from top to bottom. If nothing says that you can't, then I don't see why not.

[Ragnus]

Question;

 

Is the new Shonen Jump Obelisk the Tormentor Legal?

 

If yes' date=' does that mean it can be used in official duels?

[/quote']

 

I'll answer your question with a new question. Aside from the name of the card, does anything suggest otherwise?

 

I don't know. That's why i'm asking.

 

Think for yourself. If you have the ability to read, you can answer the new question I have just presented.

 

Read the card from top to bottom. If nothing says that you can't, then I don't see why not.

 

Alright, geez. I just wanted to make sure is all. The last duel I played using this Shonen Jump Obelisk, he told me that it's illegal to use it, even though I described to him that it isn't the same card.

 

It doesn't hurt to be careful, you know.

[burnpsy]

Question;

 

Is the new Shonen Jump Obelisk the Tormentor Legal?

 

If yes' date=' does that mean it can be used in official duels?

[/quote']

 

I'll answer your question with a new question. Aside from the name of the card, does anything suggest otherwise?

 

I don't know. That's why i'm asking.

 

Think for yourself. If you have the ability to read, you can answer the new question I have just presented.

 

Read the card from top to bottom. If nothing says that you can't, then I don't see why not.

 

Alright, geez. I just wanted to make sure is all. The last duel I played using this Shonen Jump Obelisk, he told me that it's illegal to use it, even though I described to him that it isn't the same card.

 

It doesn't hurt to be careful, you know.

 

Who's "he"? "He" must clearly be an idiot.

[Ragnus]

Question;

 

Is the new Shonen Jump Obelisk the Tormentor Legal?

 

If yes' date=' does that mean it can be used in official duels?

[/quote']

 

I'll answer your question with a new question. Aside from the name of the card, does anything suggest otherwise?

 

I don't know. That's why i'm asking.

 

Think for yourself. If you have the ability to read, you can answer the new question I have just presented.

 

Read the card from top to bottom. If nothing says that you can't, then I don't see why not.

 

Alright, geez. I just wanted to make sure is all. The last duel I played using this Shonen Jump Obelisk, he told me that it's illegal to use it, even though I described to him that it isn't the same card.

 

It doesn't hurt to be careful, you know.

 

Who's "he"? "He" must clearly be an idiot.

 

Thanks for the information, though. I'll be sure to print out this information to him the next time I duel him.

[Bringerofcake]

Can you activate Bottomless on a card that cannot be destroyed by card effects? Or is the destruction a primary condition for removing it from play?

[-Griffin]

I believe you cannot activate because part of the effect cannot resolve.

[Bringerofcake]

That's what I thought. Thanks.

[Scatty]

No, you CAN activate bottomless. It's just useless.