sora's cards [manga]

[The Highlander]

@Enguin: The card does have potential and we still cannot be sure this will be the entire effect ... anyways almost everyone used to say last strix would be plain awful as well and we did see what happened with the obvious potential of it, it turns EVERY raid raptor xyz above rank 3 into a 2- card play without setup, including ultimate falcon (also he is a "1-card" seven sins).

[Thomas★Zero]

I find it funny how the manga calls it fluffal Bear when we already have this...

 

 

On the other hand as armz noted the first line where it can be used as a Fusion Sub seems about right though it may end up being limited to Frightfur Fusions.

 

Also I would find it hilarious if they offically called this Fluffal Bear #2 if made where it relates back to past monsters which were also numbered because they shared the same name.

[Toffee.]

Also I would find it hilarious if they offically called this Fluffal Bear #2

You know, I'm wondering why the Wiki lists it as 'Fluffal Bear', when it's not even the same sort of name.

 

ファーニマル -> Furnimal/Fluffal

ファーニマル・ベア -> Furnimal Bear -> Fluffal Bear

パッチワーク・ファーニマル -> Patchwork Furnimal -> Fluffal Bear

 

'Course, it's likely just a random guess or whatever, but still.

[Enguin Enguin Enguin Enguin]

It's not a matter of defining bad. A bad card is something that is genuinely just not worth it. Like Digital Bugs, though the wolfbark isn't as bad as the others. Cards that have the potential to be good are, by definition, not bad. They may be poor on release, but the potential to age well separates a card from the chaff, if not its current capability.

 

you cannot cite an unsearchable card as a reason a searchable 1-of is bad. I know how Fluffals are, and I'm not saying this fixes issues. But being a singleton that doesn't hurt you (it's not like you're running it over a King/consistency card), how can you just say "it's bad move on"? That mindset just encourages less innovative thinking down the line.

 

I... what. I never said anything like "it's bad move on". Look,

 

I'm not writing it off. I'm saying it's bad now but acknowledging it could become good. 

Of course it could be good moving forward,

 

I'm not saying it's 100% bad, of course it could end up being very good

 

I mean that's just misrepresenting my position completely. Just as your position has been it could end up very good mine was that it's bad now, but I agree it could end up as a good 1-of. We don't even disagree on this, the only thing is you seem to think that when I say it's bad I say that with the implication it can never become good, which I don't.

[Lizardonx]

Wait dont we already have a fluffal bear?

[玄魔の王]

Wait dont we already have a fluffal bear?

Welcome to translation idiocy. The people who localised the Arc-V manga actually confused Patchwork Fluffal with the real Fluffal Bear. Somehow.

[Draconus297]

Welcome to translation idiocy. The people who localised the Arc-V manga actually confused Patchwork Fluffal with the real Fluffal Bear. Somehow.

Could its name be listed as Fluffal Bear because it was subbing in for Fluffal Bear?

 

I'm honestly thinking this might be a full-on Archetype Versago/Swamp King with some other on-Summon effect (because a few Fluffals have those), and when this thing is printed it'd be stupid good. Imagine a Fluffal Deck with a searchable Swamp King.

[Ryusei the Morning Star]

 

Happy now?

The funk, you mean it can't add exodia pieces? lame