[MtG] Judge Promo Azusa found in a Walmart 3-pack blister

[Rodrigo]

 

hnnnnnnnnnnnnng

[(GigaDrillBreaker)]

how does that even happen

[Trebuchet MS]

1. What's going on
2. How did that happen
3. I want one

    

[Kazooie]

I know nothing about general Magic, but I did play a bit of EDH. This is the first Commander I used. I want that art so much. ;-;

[Delibirb]

That is nutty.

[bury the year]

Well, that puts to rest the idea of Azusa being in EMA. But wow, that art looks incredible foiled. I'd definitely want one were I to play her in EDH.

[Delibirb]

Well, that puts to rest the idea of Azusa being in EMA. But wow, that art looks incredible foiled. I'd definitely want one were I to play her in EDH.

Technically thats not entirely true.

 

This isnt just the Judge Promo art of an Azusa reprint; its the ACTUAL Judge Promo card. Look at the collector number.

 

Target somehow got a copy(s) and put it in their little booster thingy.

 

That said, she probably wont be in EMA anyway, but this isnt the reason.

[bury the year]

Technically thats not entirely true.

 

This isnt just the Judge Promo art of an Azusa reprint; its the ACTUAL Judge Promo card. Look at the collector number.

 

Target somehow got a copy(s) and put it in their little booster thingy.

 

That said, she probably wont be in EMA anyway, but this isnt the reason.

 

You're acting like I can't read. Yes, I know this is the judge promo. But Azusa also doesn't see play in any deck outside of the now-neutered Titan archetype in Modern and the Commander format, so it's highly unlikely she will be considered as an inclusion in EMA.

[Delibirb]

You're acting like I can't read. Yes, I know this is the judge promo. But Azusa also doesn't see play in any deck outside of the now-neutered Titan archetype in Modern and the Commander format, so it's highly unlikely she will be considered as an inclusion in EMA.

You're acting like you can't read. I said myself it won't be in ema as well but this isn't the reason. But your original post seemed to imply you thought THIS was the reason she wouldn't be despite you now clearly know is not the case.

[.Rai]

You're acting like you can't read. I said myself it won't be in ema as well but this isn't the reason. But your original post seemed to imply you thought THIS was the reason she wouldn't be despite you now clearly know is not the case.

I don't even know how your reply was related to Rinne's first post.

 

It's incredibly unlikely for something to be printed in two supplemental products so close together, and it appearing as a judge promo pretty much takes it out of the running for EMA. Which is absolutely correct, and what Rinne was implying.