Jump to content

The Liberal Fantasy of Cultural Appropriation


Halubaris Maphotika

Recommended Posts

Just saying, the republican party was the liberal party at that time, and many ideologies have since swapped, so I'm not sure how relevant said point is. Republicans then really are only the same as now in name.

No, they didnt swap sides, democrats just got a new way to keep blacks/minorities under their control: They give them welfare based on skin color or lower grades to enter college which is only slightly above poverty, tell them constantly that they'll never escape because of whites or because of systematic racism or whatever and basically make them dependant on democratic votes and convince themselves nothing else will help them.

 

Lyndon B. Johnson who started heavy welfare for blacks was quoted as saying "I'll have those n***ers voting democratic for the next 200 years" among other things.

[spoiler=A Quote]

quote-i-ll-tell-you-what-s-at-the-bottom

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also: Long not-at-all-detailed post but:

 

Nazi is a shortening of NSDAP which stands for Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, which means National Socialist German Worker's Party. 

 

Common misconception. 

notsosocialist.png

 

tl;dr "National Socialist" had a nice ring to it.

 

Hitler was hardly an egalitarian leftist as his beliefs stemmed from the superiority of the Aryan race and the inferiority of Jews to the point of deserving death and enslavement.

 

 

(I mean, ronald reagan was all for reduced taxes, social spending, and less welfare

 

Yet he raised taxes anyway so he could build more prisons and jail more blacks while indeed cutting welfare. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cringe whenever liberals claim that Hitler was far right. This simply isn't true. He wanted a classless system and wanted to abolish private ownership of business. Sure people say "oh but nationalism is right wing", but when you have nationalism you'll have democracy aka mob rule: a system where the majority have control, which Is what he promoted. Long story short he was a far right democratic socialist.... Also one can draw parallels to what is happening now and what happened then. The 1% at the time where Jews were the majority put the blame on them. Now the 1% are the wealthy and liberals blame them for all our problems. They may not be as extreme but its still shocking...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This simply isn't true. He wanted a classless system and wanted to abolish private ownership of business.

 

"Private initiative of German business will experience its greatest moment…the further development of humanity through the promotion of private initiative, in which alone I see the precondition for all real progress." - Adolf Hitler 1939

 

 

Long story short he was a far right democratic socialist....

 

One-party rule =/= democratic.

Far-right =/= socialist. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...