Ryusei the Morning Star Posted February 8, 2016 Report Share Posted February 8, 2016 Hey man, I am in a loving, committed relationship.I was more so commenting on myself and a few others on this thread. After that nightmare breakup sheet show I just exited, I really shouldn't give anyone advice on relationships. You on the other hands, pretty much nailed it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted February 8, 2016 Report Share Posted February 8, 2016 Deadpool you realize a lot of us here have fairly terrible love lives right? You're pretty much asking the worse group of people for advise. The heart wants what it wants, follow that dudeHow can my love life be terrible? I date a lot of people. If you call one night stands dates, and I don't see them after that night. My love life is great. TBH, I still do dating better than most people here anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted February 8, 2016 Report Share Posted February 8, 2016 If you call one night stands datesI call that pussy hunting, not dating Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted February 8, 2016 Report Share Posted February 8, 2016 I call that pussy hunting, not datingthen i just have good aim, but i am not pussy exclusive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
epicmemesbro Posted February 9, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 I know that this isn't the best site for getting this type of advice (considering the theme of it) but I lacked any options. Its starting to become a point to where I dream about her the same day I see her...I wonder if I do have a thing for my cousins.... When I was a kid I had a crush on another cousins and people found out that someone in my family did but didn't know it was me. I got over that though a looooong time ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 Ugh, sounds tantalizing. Would there be any way to distance yourself from her in lieu of a brazen confession of forbidden love? Sounds like a chance to catch your breath might be welcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~~ Posted February 10, 2016 Report Share Posted February 10, 2016 One true love does and has existed for certain peopleIt may exist superficially, but there is always more than 1 person out there in the world for those of us that are romantically inclined. If there were only 1 person in the whole world who could be someone's lover, then they would most likely never meet them. Statistics! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted February 10, 2016 Report Share Posted February 10, 2016 It may exist superficially, but there is always more than 1 person out there in the world for those of us that are romantically inclined. If there were only 1 person in the whole world who could be someone's lover, then they would most likely never meet them. Statistics! Since one true love is derived from the perspective of fate, any two people who aren't fated to meet would be disqualified from being fated as lovers from the outset. Gnostics do not concern themselves with probabilities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordCowCowCowCowCowCowCowCow Posted February 10, 2016 Report Share Posted February 10, 2016 Since one true love is derived from the perspective of fate, any two people who aren't fated to meet would be disqualified from being fated as lovers from the outset. Gnostics do not concern themselves with probabilities. Wouldn't this mean many many people don't have a one true love, then? Isn't that a terribly depressing idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
epicmemesbro Posted February 11, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2016 Just because Valentines day is coming up doesn't mean I will muster up the courage to confess my feelings to her. I wouldn't say she is my one true love. Arguably that spot may be reserved to someone I loved in high school. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted February 11, 2016 Report Share Posted February 11, 2016 Wouldn't this mean many many people don't have a one true love, then? Isn't that a terribly depressing idea? Nah. It just means the pairings are concentrated amongst people who've crossed paths, there can still be just as many pairings as if they were randomly assigned between people across the world who "would most likely never meet", the difference is the pairings would have meaning because the one true lovers can actually fall in one true love with one another. If there were only 1 person in the whole world who could be someone's lover, then they would most likely never meet them. *This* is a terribly depressing idea. Luckily, it's fallacious, because if the "only 1 person in the whole world who could be someone's lover" in question never meets the "someone" in question, then that "only 1 person in the whole world who could be someone's lover" actually couldn't love that "someone" in question in the first place and they're not the one to begin with. If the aforementioned "someone" does have a one true love, their one true love will be drawn from the pool of people they cross paths with. A one true love you never meet is a one non-existent love, thus defeating the purpose. Hope that clarifies this, it's basically just a logical prerequisite thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King K. Azo Posted February 11, 2016 Report Share Posted February 11, 2016 I'll just put it this way. 'Following your heart' isn't always the right answer, as emotions are an ever-changing thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
epicmemesbro Posted February 11, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2016 I never really had the same feelings I had for the woman I liked. I had a few crushes but I got over them and they weren't nearly as intense. And they had none of my "preferred qualities". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~~ Posted February 12, 2016 Report Share Posted February 12, 2016 Nah. It just means the pairings are concentrated amongst people who've crossed paths, there can still be just as many pairings as if they were randomly assigned between people across the world who "would most likely never meet", the difference is the pairings would have meaning because the one true lovers can actually fall in one true love with one another. *This* is a terribly depressing idea. Luckily, it's fallacious, because if the "only 1 person in the whole world who could be someone's lover" in question never meets the "someone" in question, then that "only 1 person in the whole world who could be someone's lover" actually couldn't love that "someone" in question in the first place and they're not the one to begin with. If the aforementioned "someone" does have a one true love, their one true love will be drawn from the pool of people they cross paths with. A one true love you never meet is a one non-existent love, thus defeating the purpose. Hope that clarifies this, it's basically just a logical prerequisite thing. Yes, it is fallacious, but not for the reason you stated. I was talking about potential love; about similar personalities; about having a high "match %" with them. These things exist with or without love ever actually happening. it is fallacious though, because it is simply not true that any person has one person out there that they could - potentially - fall in love with. Arguments from fate are unfalsifiable: "it happened, therefore it was always going to happen" cannot be tested, and it therefore loses meaning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementuo Posted February 12, 2016 Report Share Posted February 12, 2016 all you scrubs going on and on about "one true loves" and "finding your soulmate" and sheet while i'm just here being polyamorus tbh if you wanna talk strictly romantic relationships/marriage, i say who the funk cares if it's your cousin as long as it's genuine if you wanna talk potential childbirth then that's something that requires a little more looking at due to the whole gene pool issue but as a general guideline i'd stay away just in caseno reason to put effort into making a life just for that life to suffer more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted February 12, 2016 Report Share Posted February 12, 2016 Arguments from fate are unfalsifiable: "it happened, therefore it was always going to happen" cannot be tested, and it therefore loses meaning. Fate doesn't argue, fate dictates. it is fallacious though, because it is simply not true that any person has one person out there that they could - potentially - fall in love with. Here you violate your own epistemological criterion. Not that I mind (please do!), though I still happen to think you're wrong because there are countless examples of couples who've lived and died with their romantic interests vested exclusively in one another, and the reason for that is because of how ingrained belief in the symbolic importance of monogamy was. I was talking about potential love; about similar personalities; Others hold that "opposites attract". about having a high "match %" with them. What is this, eHarmony? These things exist with or without love ever actually happening. Another breach in your reverence towards falsifiable knowledge. Very good, keep 'em coming. all you scrubs going on and on about "one true loves" and "finding your soulmate" and s*** while i'm just here being polyamorus Your disposition towards polyamory does not a universal norm of it make. I too am polyamorous and so celebrated it that my name here was actually "~ P O L Y A M O R Y ~" at one point. That polyamory wasn't meant for everyone is, to me, a part of what makes it as gloriously self-affirming as it is. Just as others experience the same affirmation through loving and being loved by one person exclusively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementuo Posted February 12, 2016 Report Share Posted February 12, 2016 hey man i'm not saying it's for everyone i'm just saiyan it's a possibility Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tourmaline Posted February 12, 2016 Report Share Posted February 12, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~~ Posted February 14, 2016 Report Share Posted February 14, 2016 No, it is lovers that do these things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
epicmemesbro Posted February 14, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 14, 2016 Errr since its valentine's day today, I would go to her house just to see her, but I'm still a bit sick. But she might deem it suspicious to why I went there when I'm sick. Perhaps her voice can soothe my pains... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~~ Posted February 14, 2016 Report Share Posted February 14, 2016 Perhaps her voice can soothe my pains...This is cheesier than my Uncle Bob's penis that he hasn't washed for 30 years. I suggest you don't go, Deadpool. Don't spread diseases because they are bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tourmaline Posted February 14, 2016 Report Share Posted February 14, 2016 No, it is lovers that do these things.You have 0 knowledge of what love is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordCowCowCowCowCowCowCowCow Posted February 14, 2016 Report Share Posted February 14, 2016 You have 0 knowledge of what love is.And you have 0 knowledge of what he was saying.If I'm correct in how I interpreted it.Which would be "Love is pure but people are not" kinda idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tourmaline Posted February 14, 2016 Report Share Posted February 14, 2016 And you have 0 knowledge of what he was saying.If I'm correct in how I interpreted it.Which would be "Love is pure but people are not" kinda idea.If I had no knowledge then I wouldn't say what I said. You do have a tendency to wildly and zealously defend mindlessly enough that you would speak before any thought, so you ought to think about what is behind my words (I might have not spoken to you about this though, but you should note some repeated complaints about this). Romance is a western bastion of love and not a fair representation of love as it really is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordCowCowCowCowCowCowCowCow Posted February 14, 2016 Report Share Posted February 14, 2016 If I had no knowledge then I wouldn't say what I said. You do have a tendency to wildly and zealously defend mindlessly enough that you would speak before any thought, so you ought to think about what is behind my words (I might have not spoken to you about this though, but you should note some repeated complaints about this). Romance is a western bastion of love and not a fair representation of love as it really is.I'm concerned if you believe that to be zealous. It's kinda funny, but you say I ought to think about what is behind your words, and yet, you jumped on them about not knowing what love is, when he didn't even bring up love directly. Sounds a bit like jumping the gun, but that's fine, everyone makes mistakes.Like I could be mistaken with how I interpreted it, no reason to continue without their input. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.