Jump to content

God Splice's Sig Archive...^_^


The Ruby

Recommended Posts

It's fairly good. :)

But I doubt for Sanji or Draco's likings.. I doubt even kizzi's...

Most possible issues..

Border is too plain and/or big.

The bg isn't very visible but still seems too plain.

The render seems badly cut.

The text touches the render.

etc. etc. XD

 

It's fairly good in my opinion. >=d

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's fairly good in my opinion. >=d

 

How many random smilies/frownies do you use?!?

 

On topic: I like it. The background and the render seem to fit but the text seems out of place and bland. (yes I meant to say "bland")*

 

*quote of Fencepost of Gimpdome.com Gimpalk.com' date=' and deviantart.com.

And probaly a bunch of other places I missed.[/size']

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

It's fairly good. :)

But I doubt for Sanji or Draco's likings.. I doubt even kizzi's...

Most possible issues..

Border is too plain and/or big.

The bg isn't very visible but still seems too plain.

The render seems badly cut.

The text touches the render.

etc. etc. XD

 

It's fairly good in my opinion. >=d

 

neither to my liking.

 

but i have seen people using photoshop CS3 for 3 weeks and do worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comments...

 

can someone explain what happened to my render on dark ruby...:?

 

We wouldn't know that ruby!

^_^ If we saw your .xcf file or if you told us what you've done on the signature, we might have a clue though. ;)

 

=p

Mmm...

My advice would be to use my tut more and less of Tkill's GIMP tut. =P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comments...

 

can someone explain what happened to my render on dark ruby...:?

 

We wouldn't know that ruby!

^_^ If we saw your .xcf file or if you told us what you've done on the signature' date=' we might have a clue though. ;)

 

=p

Mmm...

My advice would be to use my tut more and less of Tkill's GIMP tut. =P

[/quote']

 

I have been using your tut...>_>...XD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't tend to subscribe to the "It must be done this way" logic that appears to be currently dominating the internet these days. To me, unless it's just shoddy workmanship(which none of these are) I tend to applaud those who aren't drinking the Kool-aid. Ok, that's as close to a disclaimer from me as you'll get...onto the work. ;)

 

The First:

The only negative thing I can say about this one is that, if it were mine, I would redo the text to something a little more exciting. I'm not outright suggesting that you change the font so much as I am saying that some combination of layering effects, shading, and such to make it pop more would probably improve the overall look of the piece. This comment applies to all of yoru sigs you're showcasing in this thread

The Second:

I see nothing there for some reason.

The Third:

The feather in the background needs a little more of the lighter color on the left side about halfway up.

The Fourth:

I don't see a render in this sig at all. If you're talking about the foreground image, I think it looks fine. Just looks like it's either set to "Soft Light" or the opacity has been lowered.

The Fifth:

This is the one that I like the least. The whole thing looks blurry to me. Perhaps it's suppposed to be that way. If that's the case then just consider this a difference in taste.

 

Well, that's all I have for this time around. I look forward to seeing additional works from you. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...