_moonlight92 Posted December 17, 2015 Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 what are you even talking about I'm not "about to take [your] head off", I simply explained why you were wrong. Continuing, no one is talking about playability or legality, so I have no idea where you got that. The news of what Crimson Fox does will be learned around the 15th of January. This is when V-Jump leaks happen. They can be as soon as the 13th or as late as the 21st, or so. We'll get the leaks for SHVI around the night of the 5th/the 6th/the 7th of January. This is always when they happen, in regards to set release. I'm merely talking about when we learn what cards do, and nothing is within 2 weeks.okay well im not in school i under what your saying but there no need to be so rude about but who was even talking to you or asked to comment about what i talking about with another user now you have a wonderful day hun. I know, I'm just saying.it's cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted December 17, 2015 Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 I'm sorry, but Black had every right to respond to you as well, there was no need to be rude back. it's coolOk then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted December 17, 2015 Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 okay well im not in school i under what your saying but there no need to be so rude about but who was even talking to you or asked to comment about what i talking about with another user now you have a wonderful day hun. This is a public thread. Don't act like a child and tell people "I wasn't talking to you." I wasn't rude to you in the least. I simply explained how this works. We'll know what the other Moonlights do in 3 weeks or less, and we'll know Crimson Fox in approximately 4. No need to get your panties in a twist because you were uninformed and someone corrected your misconceptions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted December 17, 2015 Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 You're right Black, I don't think he had the moral high ground to speak to you like that in his last post. (Probs worded that wrong, but you should get the idea) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_moonlight92 Posted December 17, 2015 Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 This is a public thread. Don't act like a child and tell people "I wasn't talking to you." I wasn't rude to you in the least. I simply explained how this works. We'll know what the other Moonlights do in 3 weeks or less, and we'll know Crimson Fox in approximately 4. No need to get your panties in a twist because you were uninformed and someone corrected your misconceptions.okay and what does it matter? i was clearly just talking i didn't know that making a mistake was crime and being talked like an idiot was okay. but as i said before i will not go back and forth with you so good day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Faytl~ Posted December 17, 2015 Author Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 Jesus H Christmas, calm down, guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_moonlight92 Posted December 17, 2015 Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 I'm sorry, but Black had every right to respond to you as well, there was no need to be rude back. Ok then.i was not being rude if you read the message you can clearly see the way i was spoken to was not right but whatever it's no biggie it's just a forum and im not going to waste my time typing about something that's irrelevant im happy that were getting crimson fox end of story. I'm sorry, but Black had every right to respond to you as well, there was no need to be rude back. Ok then.i was not being rude if you read the message you can clearly see the way i was spoken to was not right but whatever it's no biggie it's just a forum and im not going to waste my time typing about something that's irrelevant im happy that were getting crimson fox end of story. I'm sorry, but Black had every right to respond to you as well, there was no need to be rude back. Ok then.i was not being rude if you read the message you can clearly see the way i was spoken to was not right but whatever it's no biggie it's just a forum and im not going to waste my time typing about something that's irrelevant im happy that were getting crimson fox end of story. I'm sorry, but Black had every right to respond to you as well, there was no need to be rude back. Ok then.i was not being rude if you read the message you can clearly see the way i was spoken to was not right but whatever it's no biggie it's just a forum and im not going to waste my time typing about something that's irrelevant im happy that were getting crimson fox end of story. Jesus H Christmas, calm down, guys.i'm calm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted December 17, 2015 Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 I was not being rude, if you read the message you can clearly see the way I was spoken to was not right but whatever it's no biggie it's just a forum and I'm not going to waste my time typing about something that's irrelevant, I'm happy that we're getting Crimson Fox, end of story.To be fair, you saying to Black; "but who was even talking to you or asked you to comment" wasn't right either because like he said, it made you look like a child.Anywho, at least you're trying to be the big man and wanting to shelve the argument because it'd end up derailing the thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_moonlight92 Posted December 17, 2015 Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 To be fair, you saying to Black; "but who was even talking to you or asked you to comment" wasn't right either because like he said, it made you look like a child.Anywho, at least you're trying to be the big man and wanting to shelve the argument because it'd end up derailing the thread.right there's no need to i was just having a conversation saying maybe or this has happened in the past and etc hopefully we find out the effect soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted December 17, 2015 Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 Right, there's no need to, I was just having a conversation saying maybe or this has happened in the past and etc. Hopefully we find out the effect soon.Like Black said, the effect will be known in like 4 weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_moonlight92 Posted December 17, 2015 Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 Like Black said, the effect will be known in like 4 weeks.great i can't wait to here the effect in 4 weeks :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted December 17, 2015 Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 So, I know virtually nothing of this archetype, Armz kinda just gave me a rundown of the important stuff. I am kinda getting a GK vibe from them as a whole, trying to pull multiple fusion summons in a row to OTK. Of course, the problem is that these are (from what I can tell) limited to Polymerization, while GK have like 17 ways to fusion summon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted December 17, 2015 Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 So, I know virtually nothing of this archetype, Armz kinda just gave me a rundown of the important stuff. I am kinda getting a GK vibe from them as a whole, trying to pull multiple fusion summons in a row to OTK. Of course, the problem is that these are (from what I can tell) limited to Polymerization, while GK have like 17 ways to fusion summon.one of the pendulums they got (Level 6, scale 1) has a fusion gate effect other pendulum has a OPT revive a Moon-Light fusion, but effs are negated, it can't attack, and it dies in EP buff seems likely for the former Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ENMaker Posted December 17, 2015 Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 GK? What is GK? I had thought it was Gravekeepers but they don't have any fusions or anything like that, was it Gladiator Beasts? Or is there another archetype I'm forgetting. Anyway this being a Limiter Removal floater is cool. Interested to try Moonlights at least a bit, they've a lot required to catch up to Fluffal level though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_moonlight92 Posted December 17, 2015 Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 So, I know virtually nothing of this archetype, Armz kinda just gave me a rundown of the important stuff. I am kinda getting a GK vibe from them as a whole, trying to pull multiple fusion summons in a row to OTK. Of course, the problem is that these are (from what I can tell) limited to Polymerization, while GK have like 17 ways to fusion summon.i hope they get a poly or something i mean it would suck to have to use poly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ENMaker Posted December 17, 2015 Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 i hope they get a poly or something i mean it would suck to have to use poly. Fluffals use Poly and are excellent. You can, if you really want to, run 9 of it, so there's no consistency issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted December 17, 2015 Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 @Enguin: GK = Gem-Knights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_moonlight92 Posted December 17, 2015 Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 Fluffals use Poly and are excellent. You can, if you really want to, run 9 of it, so there's no consistency issue.yeah that's right but when i play fluffal i use dark fusion but i already started pre building the deck already and im using 3 polys and king of the swap as well as fusion recovery maybe to help also so im hoping i can be able fusion at least every turn. Fluffals use Poly and are excellent. You can, if you really want to, run 9 of it, so there's no consistency issue.yeah that's right but when i play fluffal i use dark fusion but i already started pre building the deck already and im using 3 polys and king of the swap as well as fusion recovery maybe to help also so im hoping i can be able fusion at least every turn. Fluffals use Poly and are excellent. You can, if you really want to, run 9 of it, so there's no consistency issue.yeah that's right but when i play fluffal i use dark fusion but i already started pre building the deck already and im using 3 polys and king of the swap as well as fusion recovery maybe to help also so im hoping i can be able fusion at least every turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.