Flame Dragon Posted December 13, 2015 Report Share Posted December 13, 2015 or maybe I should use this art Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted December 13, 2015 Report Share Posted December 13, 2015 Well ok. I want both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted December 13, 2015 Report Share Posted December 13, 2015 So, either five filters, or even more interestingly, no enemy tangolands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted December 13, 2015 Report Share Posted December 13, 2015 no enemy charmlands.I'm not ok with this. I'm not really ok with the other, either, but especially this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted December 13, 2015 Report Share Posted December 13, 2015 I'm not ok with this. I'm not really ok with the other, either, but especially this one. pfft charmlands was never even a thing I think that the payoff is that allies get the tangos, and enemy colours get the manlands. While Wizards have said that they want all the colours to get a dual across a block, I think they're very willing to split that into two cycles for variation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bury the year Posted December 13, 2015 Report Share Posted December 13, 2015 Does Forbidden Orchard even see eternal play? My only thought is if Oath is still a thing, but outside of that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted December 13, 2015 Report Share Posted December 13, 2015 Does Forbidden Orchard even see eternal play? My only thought is if Oath is still a thing, but outside of that...Just Vintage Oath. Legacy tries, and Modern hasn't even grasped it. But Vintage is the only one to pull it off successfully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted December 13, 2015 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2015 So, either five filters, or even more interestingly, no enemy tangolands. No, we can still have banjolands. 26-35 are the filters 36-40 are random lands 41-45 are the banjolands The numbering would still allow for this atm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poc Posted December 13, 2015 Report Share Posted December 13, 2015 So were getting 10 filters and a bunch of broken legacy level lands? Neat. My guesses so far is Wasteland, City of Traitors and Cavern of Souls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted December 13, 2015 Report Share Posted December 13, 2015 No, we can still have banjolands. 26-35 are the filters 36-40 are random lands 41-45 are the banjolands The numbering would still allow for this atm. You're right, ignore me! So were getting 10 filters and a bunch of broken legacy level lands? Neat. My guesses so far is Wasteland, City of Traitors and Cavern of Souls I'm expecting the other two, but City of Traitors is on the Reserved List. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted December 13, 2015 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2015 Pretty sure Wasteland is like 100% to make it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodrigo Posted December 13, 2015 Report Share Posted December 13, 2015 Now I really hope I pull a Wasteland in my fatpack. I've always wanted to own one but I could never justify buying it since Strip Mine is strictly better in EDH, though having both would obviously be even better in a Crucible of Worlds deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gokai-Red Posted December 13, 2015 Report Share Posted December 13, 2015 I kinda believe that there is not enemy battlelandz, mainly coz we will have 2 WR, UR, GB lands in the same set...that is not likely to happen WHICH IS INCREDIBLY SAD I wanted a WR battleland >>>>>>>>>>> than a Manland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.