Jump to content

Gateway Of The Six


Recommended Posts

Gateway Of The Six

Continuous Spell Card

Each time a "Six Samurai" monster(s) is Normal or Special Summoned, place 2 Bushido Counters on this card. You can remove Bushido Counters from your side of the field to activate these effects.
● 2 Counters: Target 1 face-up "Six Samurai" or "Shien" Effect Monster; that target gains 500 ATK until the End Phase.
● 4 Counters: Add 1 "Six Samurai" monster from your Deck or Graveyard to your hand.
● 6 Counters: Target 1 "Shien" Effect Monster in your Graveyard; Special Summon that target.
 
lA11e1M.png
 
Well, i was not quite that involved with Yugioh when this card apparently broke the format as people say. Many people who i discussed about said that "this bullshit card should never come back". Well, i just wanted to know was this card really that much broken compared to today's standard ? and also could this card come back as is or with an errata in current state of the casual or meta game ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

>People say OCG banlist is better than TCG's

>Gateway is Semi-limited in OCG

 

I wouldn't mind getting this card back, since I play Six Sams and I wouldn't mind with a new errata. Placing 1 Bushido Counters instead of 2 or making this Once per turn might bring this back.

This card is perfectly safe at 2 without any of those things. Tcg is just a JABRONI regarding bans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>People say OCG banlist is better than TCG's>Gateway is Semi-limited in OCGI wouldn't mind getting this card back, since I play Six Sams and I wouldn't mind with a new errata. Placing 1 Bushido Counters instead of 2 or making this Once per turn might bring this back.

It's hard to say better or worse. It's different. You'd be very hard to say

"Better" universally. They both have their flaws and merits

 

 

It's fine at 2 in OCG. Three is too damn consistent. 1 is just sacky and unreliable. TCG post Pepe could expect with it IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Muh meta relevancy!"

 

And what after mages and pals, monarchs and etc get hit and sams become meta because of this card being at 2? What then?

 

It should still stay banned.

Fascinating theory Ringo. Why are Sam's not the top deck of tier 2 then?

 

Oh no. We must ban Cloudians, because if everything get bit then they'll be meta

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Muh meta relevancy!"

 

And what after mages and pals, monarchs and etc get hit and sams become meta because of this card being at 2? What then?

 

It should still stay banned.

That is the most dumb argument i have ever seen and i have seen people argue and defend terrorists. Why not ban batteryman and deskbots then ? oh lets also ban mermails. Every deck can be meta given the right chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep it banned

Idc about its relevancy to the meta. Card makes effortless dragon ruler tier plays.

Can you...like you know...show proof? Cause Neutered Heroes and Nekroz are higher in tier 2 than it....and half of you were crying about how those decks got slaughtered or is this just bullshit logic salt?

 

Good Lord, even with one Gateway Legendary Six are dumb, you want to give them two?

pulling that out of your add mate? Cause evidence speaks to the contrary
Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol half of the people b****ing about sams and this card are those who just cant see a deck get relevancy. Where was yr b****ing sense when ariadne and the counter trap, pepe and the recent quantums arrived ?

Pepe is a deck stronger than March rulers. Don't use that as a standard.

 

Nekroz with 1 Djinn 1 Brio 1 Cycle 1 Unicore 1 Shuritt 1 Prep is beating Sams

 

That's a better comparison. Or perhaps Heroes with 1 Straoz and 1 Mist are beating 2 gateway sams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pepe is a deck stronger than March rulers. Don't use that as a standard.

 

Nekroz with 1 Djinn 1 Brio 1 Cycle 1 Unicore 1 Shuritt 1 Prep is beating Sams

 

That's a better comparison. Or perhaps Heroes with 1 Straoz and 1 Mist are beating 2 gateway sams

I mean, lol people are complaining tcg side sams broken if they get gateway at 2 ? LOL guys are you ok ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean people were complaining about Trishula and Goyo a year ago two. It's easy to complain about a card when it's banned less so if it gets unbanned and causes no problems

 

 

I mean six sams would still get wrecked by the majority of tier decks out there even if this card was never banned and was on 1 or 2.

Why are you two fingering each other instead of adding to the discussion?

 

Card is scary and powerful. Coming straight back to 2 would be a bad idea. Brining it to 1 for a test drive for a format would not be the worst idea, though I'd vote against it if I could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gateway is effectively half of Spellbook of Judgement that's unsearchable and more vulnerable if we consider Kizan to be the "Spellbooks"

 

Why are you two fingering each other instead of adding to the discussion?

 

Card is scary and powerful. Coming straight back to 2 would be a bad idea. Brining it to 1 for a test drive for a format would not be the worst idea, though I'd vote against it if I could.

I'm not. I'm just trying to rationalize a known phenomenon of overhyping cards

 

No need for your vote haha Tewart is the only one with a ballot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are you two fingering each other instead of adding to the discussion?

 

Card is scary and powerful. Coming straight back to 2 would be a bad idea. Brining it to 1 for a test drive for a format would not be the worst idea, though I'd vote against it if I could.

lol, so people can vote of stratos back but gateway is "scary and powerful". okay, lol this is funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...