Guest Star Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 This card should be limited. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 At this point, they could unlimit this card, Black Luster Soldier - Envoy of the Beginning, and Cyber-Stein without causing any change to the meta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 Your missed the era of constantly new appearing card discussions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 Oh, and on a good list it would be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 Obviously, its too easy to bring out and it can easily become better than snipe hunter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 Obviously' date=' its too easy to bring out and it can easily become better than snipe hunter.[/quote'] No, Snipe Hunter will always be better than this thing. That's why Snipe Hunter would be banned too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 Cyber Stein would be the best card in the game if they unbanned it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 Cyber Stein would be the best card in the game if they unbanned it. No. lrn2play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 Cyber Stein would be the best card in the game if they unbanned it. Except it wouldn't be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 haha at above 2 and i agree unlimit it would then become one of the best commons in the game ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 Cyber Stein would be the best card in the game if they unbanned it. Long version: They could unlimit Cyber Stein' date=' Black Luster Soldier - Envoy of the Beginning, Tsukuyomi, Breaker the Magical Warrior, Magician of Faith, and Chaos Sorcerer tomorrow, and the meta wouldn't even notice. [b']Short version:[/b] No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicalGirl Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 If they were to make cards illegal (by tournament rules), they would have to stop selling them in stucture decks. ex: Magician of Faith and Chaos Sourcerer in Spellcaster Judgement simply because these structure decks are approved by the company, so it doesn't make any sense why they banned the cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicalGirl Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 Oh! and hi Crab Helmet :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 If they were to make cards illegal (by tournament rules)' date=' they would have to stop selling them in stucture decks. ex: Magician of Faith and Chaos Sourcerer in Spellcaster Judgement simply because these structure decks are approved by the company, so it doesn't make any sense why they banned the cards.[/quote'] If DAD was in a Structure Deck, would it make sense to keep it legal? (Hint: No.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 If they were to make cards illegal (by tournament rules)' date=' they would have to stop selling them in stucture decks. ex: Magician of Faith and Chaos Sourcerer in Spellcaster Judgement simply because these structure decks are approved by the company, so it doesn't make any sense why they banned the cards.[/quote'] when spellcaster judgement was released those 2 cards were still legal... and a card gets banned when they stacks the meta (or UDE thinks that they do), not when they're not massive... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 In this meta, you can do just about anything short of legalizing the Yata-lock, and no one would care. In last format, I still don't think this would warrant banning. Would it be powerful? Yes. Would there be Sorcerer decks? Yes. Would it dominate? Probably not. Its effect is useful, but only because of its ease of summoning. Otherwise, Caius is better, he can attack on the same turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicalGirl Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 OH! well it's just kind of odd to me. Oh well i guess i'm still learning new things. But's that's a good thing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 If they were to make cards illegal (by tournament rules)' date=' they would have to stop selling them in stucture decks. ex: Magician of Faith and Chaos Sourcerer in Spellcaster Judgement simply because these structure decks are approved by the company, so it doesn't make any sense why they banned the cards.[/quote'] when spellcaster judgement was released those 2 cards were still legal... and a card gets banned when they stacks the meta (or UDE thinks that they do), not when they're not massive... Not true. Chaos Sorceror was not legal. Also, the water (SD4) has Pot of Greed in it, can you even remember when that was legal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 In this meta' date=' you can do just about anything short of legalizing the Yata-lock, and no one would care. In last format, I still don't think this would warrant banning. Would it be powerful? Yes. Would there be Sorcerer decks? Yes. Would it dominate? Probably not. Its effect is useful, but only because of its ease of summoning. Otherwise, Caius is better, he can attack on the same turn.[/quote'] LOL caius... it can only make it 1 time, chaos sorcerer 1 per turn and is special summon... also caius won't make a monarch revival... but on actual meta, chaos sorcerer would become part of the DAD strategy... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 If they were to make cards illegal (by tournament rules)' date=' they would have to stop selling them in stucture decks. ex: Magician of Faith and Chaos Sourcerer in Spellcaster Judgement simply because these structure decks are approved by the company, so it doesn't make any sense why they banned the cards.[/quote'] when spellcaster judgement was released those 2 cards were still legal... and a card gets banned when they stacks the meta (or UDE thinks that they do), not when they're not massive... Not true. Chaos Sorceror was not legal. Also, the water (SD4) has Pot of Greed in it, can you even remember when that was legal? pot of greed was legal about 2 years ago, but it lasted 6 month only... about the date of releasing of the SD4... when SD6 (spellcaster) was released, chaos sorcerer was limited at 2 and magician of faith was limited to 1, but on the next list MoF was semilimited and chaos limited to 1... that was the first approaching of upperdeck to the OCG ban list... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 If they were to make cards illegal (by tournament rules)' date=' they would have to stop selling them in stucture decks. ex: Magician of Faith and Chaos Sourcerer in Spellcaster Judgement simply because these structure decks are approved by the company, so it doesn't make any sense why they banned the cards.[/quote'] when spellcaster judgement was released those 2 cards were still legal... and a card gets banned when they stacks the meta (or UDE thinks that they do), not when they're not massive... Not true. Chaos Sorceror was not legal. Also, the water (SD4) has Pot of Greed in it, can you even remember when that was legal? pot of greed was legal about 2 years ago, but it lasted 6 month only... about the date of releasing of the SD4... when SD6 (spellcaster) was released, chaos sorcerer was limited at 2 and magician of faith was limited to 1, but on the next list MoF was semilimited and chaos limited to 1... that was the first approaching of upperdeck to the OCG ban list... Chaos Sorcerer was never at 2. He was unlimited up until September 2006, at which point he was banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 In this meta' date=' you can do just about anything short of legalizing the Yata-lock, and no one would care. In last format, I still don't think this would warrant banning. Would it be powerful? Yes. Would there be Sorcerer decks? Yes. Would it dominate? Probably not. Its effect is useful, but only because of its ease of summoning. Otherwise, Caius is better, he can attack on the same turn.[/quote'] LOL caius... it can only make it 1 time, chaos sorcerer 1 per turn and is special summon... also caius won't make a monarch revival... but on actual meta, chaos sorcerer would become part of the DAD strategy... Caius's one-time use is irrelevant. The average life-span of a monster is one turn anyway... I'd rather be able to attack. And how would he work in DAD? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 In this meta' date=' you can do just about anything short of legalizing the Yata-lock, and no one would care. In last format, I still don't think this would warrant banning. Would it be powerful? Yes. Would there be Sorcerer decks? Yes. Would it dominate? Probably not. Its effect is useful, but only because of its ease of summoning. Otherwise, Caius is better, he can attack on the same turn.[/quote'] LOL caius... it can only make it 1 time, chaos sorcerer 1 per turn and is special summon... also caius won't make a monarch revival... but on actual meta, chaos sorcerer would become part of the DAD strategy... Caius's one-time use is irrelevant. The average life-span of a monster is one turn anyway... I'd rather be able to attack. And how would he work in DAD? DAD runs lots of LIGHT monsters. Didn't you get the memo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 In this meta' date=' you can do just about anything short of legalizing the Yata-lock, and no one would care. In last format, I still don't think this would warrant banning. Would it be powerful? Yes. Would there be Sorcerer decks? Yes. Would it dominate? Probably not. Its effect is useful, but only because of its ease of summoning. Otherwise, Caius is better, he can attack on the same turn.[/quote'] LOL caius... it can only make it 1 time, chaos sorcerer 1 per turn and is special summon... also caius won't make a monarch revival... but on actual meta, chaos sorcerer would become part of the DAD strategy... Caius's one-time use is irrelevant. The average life-span of a monster is one turn anyway... I'd rather be able to attack. And how would he work in DAD? DAD runs lots of LIGHT monsters. Didn't you get the memo? >Goes and checks a couple deck lists< Whoops, sorry. Brain Fart. EDIT: Actually, I just felt like saying Brain fart, I did just check a couple deck lists, no lights. I'm assuming you're be sarcastic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 In this meta' date=' you can do just about anything short of legalizing the Yata-lock, and no one would care. In last format, I still don't think this would warrant banning. Would it be powerful? Yes. Would there be Sorcerer decks? Yes. Would it dominate? Probably not. Its effect is useful, but only because of its ease of summoning. Otherwise, Caius is better, he can attack on the same turn.[/quote'] LOL caius... it can only make it 1 time, chaos sorcerer 1 per turn and is special summon... also caius won't make a monarch revival... but on actual meta, chaos sorcerer would become part of the DAD strategy... Caius's one-time use is irrelevant. The average life-span of a monster is one turn anyway... I'd rather be able to attack. And how would he work in DAD? DAD runs lots of LIGHT monsters. Didn't you get the memo? >Goes and checks a couple deck lists< Whoops, sorry. Brain Fart. EDIT: Actually, I just felt like saying Brain fart, I did just check a couple deck lists, no lights. I'm assuming you're be sarcastic? Obviously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.