EndUser Posted October 14, 2015 Report Share Posted October 14, 2015 Excuse me if I'm not so active in here because of... any reason :/ but I'd like to start it from somewhere.So yeah. I'm EndUser. Sign me up pls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arimetal Posted October 15, 2015 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2015 Accepted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EndUser Posted October 15, 2015 Report Share Posted October 15, 2015 So, I was thinking: If Reincarnation is a thing, can it be related to the animals who are unexplainably different from their group, like when e.g. a lion befriends with a deer or a female cat allows doggies to suck from her? I mean, would a previously born animal or person instinctively behave better/differently afterwards?(If you didn't notice, humans are included to the case of being reborn as animals and not only as humans) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catman25 Posted October 17, 2015 Report Share Posted October 17, 2015 I think a lot of it has to do with the environment one grows up in, that impression. You've probably heard of like ducks or chicks that see humans or other species as their mothers in the absence of their birth mothers. Regardless of if reincarnation exists, I'm not sure if that can be cited as an explanation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EndUser Posted October 17, 2015 Report Share Posted October 17, 2015 I think I wasn't clear enough... Here, a video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwckFvvRXZI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catman25 Posted October 17, 2015 Report Share Posted October 17, 2015 Nah you were pretty clear, I'm just saying a lot of these animals probably grew up in artificial environments like captivity, where that sort of natural predatory behavior never exactly developed so they have no problems being friendly with other animals. The cat/dog example kind of follows the duck example I mentioned, in the absence of a maternal figure that'll often happen. Simply conjecture, but still, reincarnation seems like a stretch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GarlandChaos Posted October 17, 2015 Report Share Posted October 17, 2015 Well, the way I see reincarnation, is that after you die, there's a chance that you may be reincarnated into the creature that represents you the best. For example: A head-strong born leader may be reincarnated as a lion; a shy and quiet individual may be reincarnated as a snail or turtle; a ferocious and hot-blooded person may be reincarnated as a gorilla, or anything else that would better represent the characteristics given. So, thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sethera Posted October 17, 2015 Report Share Posted October 17, 2015 I'm not too sure on the idea of reincarnation. It could be a thing, and if that's so, then cool. If not, that's cool too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arimetal Posted October 24, 2015 Author Report Share Posted October 24, 2015 Bump so this club doesn't die from inactivity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EndUser Posted October 24, 2015 Report Share Posted October 24, 2015 I guess people prefer to sleep instead of think. Which is weird, because you can't sleep with absolutely nothing in your mind. An impression, a feeling, something! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EndUser Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 K... I think someone needs to wake you up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arimetal Posted November 2, 2015 Author Report Share Posted November 2, 2015 BUMP jabroni QUICK! SOMEONE SAY SOMETHING TO START AN INTELLIGENT CONVERSATION! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted November 2, 2015 Report Share Posted November 2, 2015 Do you think protesting that disrupts public order is right? For example, protesters that block a road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catman25 Posted November 2, 2015 Report Share Posted November 2, 2015 I don't thinking it can ever be "right", but it can certainly be effective. Iirc the Occupy movements or some related thing made getting to work in NYC a nightmare. For a protest, interfering with the public will garner you more attention, which seems to be the aim. But I think the magnitude of the protest, the polarity of the issue, and the amount of support kinda of factor into it. Bad example, but it's the only one I can think of: if y'all remember, there's an episode of Ned's Declassified School Survival Guide, where they get the entire student body to protest and not go to class. It was over something trivial, but the had the majority on their side. The VP threatened to expel anyone who didn't go to class, but due to the sheer number of possible expulsions, it wasn't a situation the school wanted to be in, so he gave in to the protest. So I guess I'm saying it's wrong, but that's why it's so effective Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arimetal Posted November 2, 2015 Author Report Share Posted November 2, 2015 I don't think so. I honestly think they should be arrested. They can have their campaigns, they can hang fliers, but I need to get to school/work. So they don't need to disrupt me or anyone elses day in such a way. There are better ways to do it, blocking my car, makes me want to not listen to what you have to say, what.so.ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EndUser Posted November 2, 2015 Report Share Posted November 2, 2015 I don't think so. I honestly think they should be arrested. They can have their campaigns, they can hang fliers, but I need to get to school/work. So they don't need to disrupt me or anyone elses day in such a way. There are better ways to do it, blocking my car, makes me want to not listen to what you have to say, what.so.ever. This pretty much. However, we (each one of us) tend to know things from the Media, our work or people and surroundings close to us. Not that we only learn from them, but the infuence is stronger from them. Protesting so openly gives us the idea of a group or very unsatisfied people from something, hence learning that something is not right. It may interest us, it may not. This is all to it; everything else is just a nuisance to everybody else except the in-problem people."Ok, I realise that something's wrong. It interests me/I wanna join/I don't see what's the problem/you don't let me work!" etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arimetal Posted November 4, 2015 Author Report Share Posted November 4, 2015 So, new subject. Where is the line on incest? E.g. 3rd cousins/Step-Siblings/Twins/etc. And what causes it? Like, other than lust for the other person, why are people drawn towards family members? How does the "It isn't just lust" argument rub off for you? If you have any interesting input, feel free to add. (I'm asking cuz there was a case recently in my home town where apparently a boy impregnated his cousin) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thar Posted November 4, 2015 Report Share Posted November 4, 2015 Where is the line on incest?4th cousins. And what causes it? Like, other than lust for the other person, why are people drawn towards family members?Cause they're either extremely attractive or extremely close, usually the latter because it has to be mutual to actually happen, otherwise you're just creepy.How does the "It isn't just lust" argument rub off for you?Lust is only a sexual desire, so any personal connections that aren't related to sex is out of the question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catman25 Posted November 4, 2015 Report Share Posted November 4, 2015 We just covered inbreeding in Genetics class, with each distant generation, inbreeding coefficient decreases by a factor of two; basically, offspring are at risk for more stuff, it's just a matter of what percentage you think is low enough to take that risk, and in regards to that, I can't offer an opinion Honestly, I don't see anything wrong with the concept of having those types of feelings for someone closely related to you, it's just when you get down to the genetics, you can potentially put other people at risk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordCowCowCowCowCowCowCowCow Posted November 4, 2015 Report Share Posted November 4, 2015 You can't choose who you love, but you can choose not to act on it. Imo it's not inherently wrong but it's also risky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arimetal Posted November 13, 2015 Author Report Share Posted November 13, 2015 I'm a terrible at this Club thing Discuss the Cup thing and why Starbucks hates Jesus (or not) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catman25 Posted November 19, 2015 Report Share Posted November 19, 2015 I don't actually know any of the details, sounds like people are just too oversensitive. There were no complaints about the original cups and how Starbucks loved Jesus back then were there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted November 19, 2015 Report Share Posted November 19, 2015 Actually, the complaints are for the lack of Christmas on the cups. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catman25 Posted November 19, 2015 Report Share Posted November 19, 2015 Yeah that's what I'm saying. Were there complaints when they first put the Christmas stuff on the cups (like last year)? Probably not. Whether that says something about the type of people on each side, I'm not explicitly saying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.