Draconus297 Posted December 12, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 12, 2017 Yes. Updated queue:Performapal (2/3 - Kyumi, Champion)Gem-Knight, caveat TBD (3/3 - Eshai, Sakura, Dova)Melodious (2/3 - Draconus, Dova)Odd-Eyes (1/3 - Kyumi)Naturia (1/3 - Sakura) So, I ask you: Seraphinite, or BriFu? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChampionZero Posted December 12, 2017 Report Share Posted December 12, 2017 Personally, I think we should allow Seraphinite. I see far less issue with her than I do with Brilliant Fusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xlArisenRoselx Posted December 12, 2017 Report Share Posted December 12, 2017 I allow Seraphinite too. As for the queue, Melodius and Naturia have my vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinkerer Posted December 12, 2017 Report Share Posted December 12, 2017 Gem-Knights itself really need BriFu while Seraphinite doesn't much help its home deck as a whole. I think BriFu should be in and Seraph should go. I don't think GKs as a whole should be punished because a Fusion that they barely use is abused by other decks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xlArisenRoselx Posted December 12, 2017 Report Share Posted December 12, 2017 Actually, I just did a double check, and Tink has a point here. BriFu is definitely needed in Gem-Knights, but seraphinite is not. Therefore, I changed my mind. BriFu is allowed in my vote, Seraphinite banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted December 12, 2017 Report Share Posted December 12, 2017 Keep BriFu; only abusable because Seraphinite combos in EMEm/PePe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dova Posted December 12, 2017 Report Share Posted December 12, 2017 Draconus has a point in regards to BriFu still being potentially abusable in other decks, but I'm fine with it in that context, as they don't have a DARK Fusion and we're removing the LIGHT Fusion, and I would be interesting to see what other potential combos people could come up with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChampionZero Posted December 12, 2017 Report Share Posted December 12, 2017 Hey, I trust your expertise over my own, and I just kinda glanced at each card, so I'm not doing a detailed analysis of GK here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconus297 Posted December 13, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 So, even though I'm only required to make 4 cards for my Secret Santa recipient, I'm making a full (if stripped down by my standards) archetype, so my mini one-card presents for everyone else will probably be a little late. I would also like to take this opportunity to mention that, yes, I am still making one card each for all active members of the AGM, as I do every year, but just in case I forget to mention this in the thread itself (as I am wont to do): Thank you all. I might not express it much, but I do appreciate activity in the group, everyone's drive to improve, and the sheer enthusiasm I see from each of you. This year in particular has been a difficult one on my end (anyone who remembers what happened this past March knows exactly why), and having something more lighthearted to discuss is probably the only thing keeping me sane. I know that there are ~18 days left in 2017, but I am already looking forward to 2018 due to being tired of this damned year. That part said, Melodious and Gem-Knights have been added (without Seraphinite), and I have gone through most of the recent leaks and added anything and everything that the AGM could use/wanted. I'm also working on a support wave in my support thread, so far composed of 1 Ice Barrier card, 2 Melodious cards, 1 Carnimal card, and 1 Supreme King card. The problem is that I only work in multiples of 3, so I'm one card short . . . and wondering what needs help that I can make help for. Any of you seeing holes that need patching? One more thing- for any Konami card added to the AGM, its default place on the banlist is an average between its OCG and TCG placement (so, for example, Construct is banned in the TCG, but at 2 in the OCG if I remember correctly, so it's at 1 here), for Deck Challenge purposes until we have a sim up to work with. Also, Library of Sanctuary and Fireburst Cemetery are Limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xlArisenRoselx Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 Do we have Lightsworns in here? Just wondering as I have taken so much of a liking to them recently. If not, I would like to vouch for them. I also want you all to take a look at these guys, as I built them to assist Lightsworns, and tell me if they could also be added to our cardpool. Here is a link: https://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/topic/369099-lightsworn-support-without-being-lightsworns/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 Do we have Lightsworns in here? Just wondering as I have taken so much of a liking to them recently. If not, I would like to vouch for them. I also want you all to take a look at these guys, as I built them to assist Lightsworns, and tell me if they could also be added to our cardpool. Here is a link: https://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/topic/369099-lightsworn-support-without-being-lightsworns/ No, but I'd advise against it due to member opinions on LS as a whole, especially now with Twilightsworns (and salt over Judgment Dragon as-is). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconus297 Posted December 13, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 Honestly, LS probably wouldn't be so hated if it weren't for Raiden, Xyz Minerva, and JD. Those three tend to attract the most salt, for various reasons . . . but removing them would gut the Deck of just about all its better plays, and they're heavily luck based no matter which way you slice it. So, yeah, it's a no from me, too. Doesn't help that I know a guy who has played LS and variants practically forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xlArisenRoselx Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 Idc about Punishment or Judgement Dragon. We could bar it if we have to. I just want the Original Lightsworns and the Twilightsworns in. Obviously we have to bar Krios, but that is given. Also, what about the other ones? The ones I linked to? They are designed in a way that they'll help LS, but can function fine on their own too. Mind checking the out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Nyx Avatar Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 For me, I don't really care for Lightsworns. If they were added in: Whatever. But as an archetype, I never took interest in them. As for Gem-Kinghts: I don't mind their addition, regardless if a select few cards are ommited or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChampionZero Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 In regards to Lightsworn. If you're wondering what the hell that is, it's the Dead Sea, the saltiest body of water in the world, right after my jabroni ass after fighting a Lightsworn Deck. I rest my case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 Honestly, I don't care about Lightsworns in general, save for that one time the YGOPro AI triple JD'd me (and yeah, RL made it that much easier to do it with the structure deck). If some people want them in, fine, but looking at it, looks like it is a no. As for Kyumi's LS-"LITE", we'll have to look. ====To put it more clearly, I don't really have an opinion of them (existing LS). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconus297 Posted December 14, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2017 I mean, we already have a pseudo LS in Lightkin, so the issue there is redundancy. HOWEVER, since Kyumi did suggest them . . . it's queue time. Performapal (2/3 - Kyumi, Champion)Naturia (2/3 - Sakura, Kyumi)Odd-Eyes (1/3 - Kyumi)Lightsworn, bar Curious for obvious reasons (1/3 - Kyumi) I actually like F.A. (in fact, it's the only archetype created since Arc-V ended that I've enjoyed), but I'm hesitant to suggest them because something stupid might happen. So, if they don't get any support in FLOD, I'll assume KoA forgot their existence and put them on the queue. Funny thing is, I even have a support lineup ready for the moment they're added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Nyx Avatar Posted December 14, 2017 Report Share Posted December 14, 2017 I thought I gave Naturia a thumbs up or approval. But I guess not. In any case, I'd be happy to have Naturia added in! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconus297 Posted December 14, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2017 I was erring on the side of caution, not sure exactly how Rank-Conversion-Magic: Heroic Force would handle the head rush of being able to drop Exterio by trading in any Rank 8 or 9 Xyz, and any EARTH Synchro engines might go a little nuts with Beast and Barkion . . . but I suppose that they won't do that much harm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xlArisenRoselx Posted December 18, 2017 Report Share Posted December 18, 2017 What Numerix do we not have yet? Or are they all filled in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChampionZero Posted December 18, 2017 Report Share Posted December 18, 2017 We're only missing some Delta Numerix, it seems. I'll try and dig up my prototypes over the break. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xlArisenRoselx Posted December 18, 2017 Report Share Posted December 18, 2017 U sure? I coulda sworn we needed some more.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChampionZero Posted December 18, 2017 Report Share Posted December 18, 2017 Unless there's some whole number between 1 and 100 I don't know about, I don't think we do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xlArisenRoselx Posted December 18, 2017 Report Share Posted December 18, 2017 Would we like to make some more, y'know, past 100? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconus297 Posted December 18, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 18, 2017 There were talks about making more past 100, but those wouldn't get the Imperial support (cards that only work for "Numerix-10" monsters), so nobody wanted to make them.But yeah, I kinda want to fill in the Delta-Numerix for existing Numerix before starting on more. If you want to make more, please be sure to include a Delta or two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.